[...] findings from studies that cannot be verified when the experiments are repeated have a bigger influence over time. The unreliable research tends to be cited as if the results were true long after the publication failed to replicate.
"We also know that experts can predict well which papers will be replicated" [...]
[...] papers that successfully replicate are cited 153 times less than those that failed.
[...] In psychology, only 39 percent of the 100 experiments successfully replicated. In economics, 61 percent of the 18 studies replicated as did 62 percent of the 21 studies published in Nature/Science.
[...] The largest gap was in papers published in Nature/Science: non-replicable papers were cited 300 times more than replicable ones.
[...]
"Remarkably, only 12 percent of post-replication citations of non-replicable findings acknowledge the replication failure"'
https://phys.org/new...true-cited.html
This post has been edited by Azath Vitr (D'ivers: 21 May 2021 - 07:03 PM