the worst fantasy books ever!
#1
Posted 01 October 2008 - 09:29 PM
okay it willl be easy to rubbish jordan, eddings, kevin anderson, david macfarland etc. what i'm after is the have nothing else to read, can't finish a book halfway through tory. who's for sean russel anyone?
sitting down here in the campfire light, waiting on the ghost of tom joad.
#2
Posted 01 October 2008 - 09:41 PM
You forgot to add Goodkind to the rubbishing list
.

Cougar said:
Grief, FFS will you do something with your sig, it's bloody awful
worry said:
Grief is right (until we abolish capitalism).
#3
Posted 01 October 2008 - 11:54 PM
David Drake (Lord of the Isles guy) can chew my balls
#4
Posted 02 October 2008 - 01:12 AM
The Book of Five (Irrelevant) Dragons by Erik Van Lustbader is shockingly bad. The only positive thing I can say about it is that when I forced myself to finish the first of the series (and it was force, back in the day when I still read everything that I started, before Eddings' Crystal Gorge broke my brain) I was so in need of purging the bad that I went straight out and picked up the first book at the library which caught my eye. Which happened to be Gardens of the Moon. Which helped.
I can't carry it for you, but I can carry you.
#5
Posted 02 October 2008 - 10:21 AM
The Redemption of Althalus - D&L Eddings
A Secret History of Moscow - Ekaterina Sedia
Thomas Covenant series - S. Donaldson
American Gods - Neil Gaiman
Perdido Street Station - C. Mieville (for the worst ending ever)
A Secret History of Moscow - Ekaterina Sedia
Thomas Covenant series - S. Donaldson
American Gods - Neil Gaiman
Perdido Street Station - C. Mieville (for the worst ending ever)
Only Two Things Are Infinite, The Universe and Human Stupidity, and I'm Not Sure About The Former.
Albert Einstein
Albert Einstein
#6
Posted 02 October 2008 - 10:50 AM
Astra, on Oct 2 2008, 11:21 AM, said:
Perdido Street Station - C. Mieville (for the worst ending ever)
Really, you didn't like the ending? Whyever not? I thought it was perfect.
As for Donaldson & Gaiman above, well, my opinion on these works of genius is a matter of record

It is perfectly monstrous the way people go about nowadays saying things against one, behind one's back, that are absolutely and entirely true.
-- Oscar Wilde
-- Oscar Wilde
#7
Posted 02 October 2008 - 01:48 PM
Gaiman & donaldson came up in purgatory when someone put them under what not to read. I loved Gaiman, though is other stuff is weaker apparently. Couldnt get past the Second Chronicles book. I can see why they're good, but I HATE the main character.
Hmm, Dont have anything to put here, dont read a book unless I'm pretty sure it's gonna be good...
Hmm, Dont have anything to put here, dont read a book unless I'm pretty sure it's gonna be good...
[url="http://www.alt146.zzl.org"]MafiaManager[/url]: My Mafia Modding tool - Now at v0.3b
With great power comes a great integral of energy over time.
With great power comes a great integral of energy over time.
#8
Posted 02 October 2008 - 02:23 PM
The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant were great, I loved the main character. He was unique, confused and never boring; it was painfully realistic to some extent.
Jitsukerr: you seem to be a person of taste.
Jitsukerr: you seem to be a person of taste.
This post has been edited by Dancer: 02 October 2008 - 02:24 PM
#9
Posted 02 October 2008 - 02:31 PM
He was also whiny, selfish and never actually does anything cool. They're good books, I just didnt enjoy them. Kinda like Mozart is good music, but I dont listen to it

[url="http://www.alt146.zzl.org"]MafiaManager[/url]: My Mafia Modding tool - Now at v0.3b
With great power comes a great integral of energy over time.
With great power comes a great integral of energy over time.
#10
Posted 02 October 2008 - 03:42 PM
so all in all a realistic character then, wouldn't you agree? If it wasn't for selfish whiny and people I'd be out of a job, so its a good thing the world is chock full of them IMO
. As for uncool, I'd argue that he travelled the oceans in a stone ship with Giants! Killed off the banefire. almost met death at the hands of his daughter. rode a ranyhynn. fought lord foul. pissed in lake glimmermere, everyone pisses in the pool! The list is pretty long, I'm sure I don't need to continue.

souls are for wimps
#11
Posted 02 October 2008 - 03:49 PM

[url="http://www.alt146.zzl.org"]MafiaManager[/url]: My Mafia Modding tool - Now at v0.3b
With great power comes a great integral of energy over time.
With great power comes a great integral of energy over time.
#12
Posted 02 October 2008 - 04:08 PM
i think donaldson is second only to erikson. the latest covenant book is nigh on perfect. is foul an aspect of covenant?
richard rahl , zed, those women in red and the mother confessor are all cunts.
i read the first four because it was like lokking at a car crash. terrible.
G.K Wren sword of the lamb. what the fuck was that about?
camber the heretic?
and the award for spinning frank herbert in his grave goes to kevin anderson for the prequels. limp and stodgy pieces of turgid shite.
richard rahl , zed, those women in red and the mother confessor are all cunts.
i read the first four because it was like lokking at a car crash. terrible.
G.K Wren sword of the lamb. what the fuck was that about?
camber the heretic?
and the award for spinning frank herbert in his grave goes to kevin anderson for the prequels. limp and stodgy pieces of turgid shite.
sitting down here in the campfire light, waiting on the ghost of tom joad.
#13
Posted 02 October 2008 - 04:12 PM
frookenhauer, on Oct 2 2008, 04:42 PM, said:
so all in all a realistic character then, wouldn't you agree? If it wasn't for selfish whiny and people I'd be out of a job, so its a good thing the world is chock full of them IMO
Yeah, but realism doesn't always make for good reading, no?
My main problem when trying to read it though was that I just didn't like the writing style. A lot of the ideas were class, but I just couldn't get into it.
I can't carry it for you, but I can carry you.
#14
Posted 02 October 2008 - 04:42 PM
I had real difficulty with the chronicles of thomas covenant too, I loved mordants need and the gap series, but the thomas covenant series while very well written failed to entertain me, which is the key qualification in my book, I forced myself through the first trilogy hoping it would improve before I gave up.
#15
Posted 02 October 2008 - 09:25 PM
not well written? thats something i really disagree with. covenant is the truest of all heroes, greatly flawed but willing to face it. the relationship with foam follower was beautiful, simple and poignant. i'll never forget the grief fire ritual with the ghosts of sea reach. donaldson's world building was spare which made its desolation all the more palpable. he functions on a far more archetypal level than erikson. his work is not the symphony of a cast of thousands that erikson plays so beautifully, rather a more intense psycholgical parable about the duality within ourselves. the last book was a tour de force of high fantasy,the way we were forced to watch spellbound as lynden journeyed with roger and the croyel.
sitting down here in the campfire light, waiting on the ghost of tom joad.
#16
Posted 02 October 2008 - 11:58 PM
Crossroads of Twilight is the most obvious choice to me.
#17
Posted 03 October 2008 - 12:14 AM
lord of tragedy, on Oct 2 2008, 10:25 PM, said:
not well written? thats something i really disagree with. covenant is the truest of all heroes, greatly flawed but willing to face it. the relationship with foam follower was beautiful, simple and poignant. i'll never forget the grief fire ritual with the ghosts of sea reach. donaldson's world building was spare which made its desolation all the more palpable. he functions on a far more archetypal level than erikson. his work is not the symphony of a cast of thousands that erikson plays so beautifully, rather a more intense psycholgical parable about the duality within ourselves. the last book was a tour de force of high fantasy,the way we were forced to watch spellbound as lynden journeyed with roger and the croyel.
Good characters and setting aren't the only makings of a good book though. I found, in the first one, that his sense of pacing was a bit meh, and the prose was just really dull.
I can't carry it for you, but I can carry you.
#18
Posted 03 October 2008 - 01:48 AM
Donaldson is the man. I may have mentioned that i feel this way at some point in the past. I get why some people don't like him though, but the things he is slammed for don't bother me like they do some people.
Error: Signature not valid
#19
Posted 03 October 2008 - 03:59 AM
terry brooks
i read a shannara novel years ago and it was fucking horrible!
well i say 'read' but it was the only book ive ever bailed on half way thru!
Donaldson doesnt deserve to be in this list at all
i read a shannara novel years ago and it was fucking horrible!
well i say 'read' but it was the only book ive ever bailed on half way thru!
Donaldson doesnt deserve to be in this list at all
This post has been edited by mocker: 03 October 2008 - 04:01 AM
#20
Posted 03 October 2008 - 08:09 AM
Sara Dougless's Axis trilogy is pretty bad, also i couldn't finsh David Zindell's The Lightstone.
In a world gone mad, we will not spank the monkey, but the monkey will spank us.