Good news about time (and basic research into quantum computing---hope for the future):
'Scientists have seen "time crystals" interacting for the first ever time.
[...]
The breakthrough could lead to a host of new technological advances, from quantum computers to powerful GPS systems. [...]
Time crystals are so powerful because they remain together or "coherent" despite different conditions. Keeping coherence is the main difficulty that is stopping humanity from building powerful quantum computers, whose proponents argue could overcome a variety of technological problems.
[...]
"Controlling the interaction of two time crystals is a major achievement. Before this, nobody had observed two time crystals in the same system, let alone seen them interact," [...]
"Controlled interactions are the number one item on the wish list of anyone looking to harness a time crystal for practical applications, such as quantum information processing."
Standard crystals like metals or rocks are made up of atoms, arranged in a regularly repeating pattern through space. Time crystals are different: they appear to be in constant, repeating motion through time, even without anything changing them from the outside.
[...] a rare isotype of helium. They cooled it down to almost absolute zero and then created the time crystals, allowing them to touch
'
https://www.independ...k-a9674401.html
'Theories of time and time-travel have highlighted an apparent stumbling block: time travel requires changing the past, even simply by adding in the time traveller. The problem, according to chaos theory, is that the smallest of changes can cause radical consequences in the future. In this conception of time travel, it wouldn't be advisable to recover your unsaved document since this act would have huge knock-on effects on everything else.
New research in quantum physics from Los Alamos National Laboratory has shown that the so-called butterfly effect can be overcome in the quantum realm in order to "unscramble" lost information by essentially reversing time.
[...] the fact that the butterfly effect does not occur in quantum realms is not a surprising result, but demonstrating information unscrambling is both novel and important.
[...] This scenario is still hypothetical, but explores the mathematics of the actual quantum processor used by Google to demonstrate quantum supremacy in 2019.
[...] "Another potential application is to use this effect to protect information. A random evolution on a quantum circuit can make the qubit robust to perturbations. One may further exploit the discovered effect to design protocols in quantum cryptography."
[...] "Classical chaotic evolution magnifies any state damage exponentially quickly, which is known as the butterfly effect," explain Yan and Sinitsyn. "The quantum evolution, however, is
linear. This explains why, in our case, the uncontrolled damage to the state is not magnified by the subsequent complex evolution. Moreover, the fact that Bob's measurement does not damage the useful information follows from the property of entanglement correlations in the scrambled state."
Hypothetical though this scenario may be, the result already has a practical use: verifying whether a quantum system has achieved quantum supremacy. Quantum processors can simulate time-reversal in a way that classical computers cannot'
https://www.vice.com...e-quantum-world
'Major quantum computational breakthrough is shaking up physics and maths
MIP* = RE is not a typo. It is a groundbreaking discovery and the catchy title of a recent paper in the field of quantum complexity theory. Complexity theory is a zoo of "complexity classes" – collections of computational problems – of which MIP* and RE are but two.
[...] That may seem like an insignificant detail in an abstract theory without any real-world application. But physicists and mathematicians are flocking to visit the zoo, even though they probably don't understand it all. Because it turns out the discovery has astonishing consequences for their own disciplines.
[...] RE stands for problems that can be solved by a computer. It is the zoo.
[...] In complexity theory, the interrogator is the person, with limited computational power, trying to solve the problem. The prover is the new computer, which is assumed to have immense computational power. An interactive proof system is a protocol that the interrogator can use in order to determine, at least with high probability, whether the prover should be believed. By analogy, these are crimes that the police may not be able to solve, but at least innocents can convince the police of their innocence. This is the class IP.
If multiple provers can be interrogated, and the provers are not allowed to coordinate their answers (as is typically the case when the police interrogates multiple suspects), then we get to the class MIP. [...] Entanglement – a quantum feature in which qubits are spookishly entangled, even if separated – makes quantum communication fundamentally different to ordinary communication. Allowing the provers of MIP to share an entangled qubit leads to the class MIP*.
It seems obvious that communication between the provers can only serve to help the provers coordinate lies rather than assist the interrogator in discovering truth. For that reason, nobody expected that allowing more communication would make computational problems more reliable and solvable. Surprisingly, we now know that MIP* = RE. This means that quantum communication behaves wildly differently to normal communication.
[...] Grossly simplified, this asked whether infinite matrices can be approximated by finite matrices. This new paper has now proved this isn't possible – an important finding for pure mathematicians.
[...] Tsirelson's Problem. This was about two different mathematical formalisms of a single situation in quantum mechanics – to date an incredibly successful theory that explains the subatomic world. Being two different descriptions of the same phenomenon it was to be expected that the two formalisms were mathematically equivalent.
But the new paper now shows that they aren't. Exactly how they can both still yield the same results and both describe the same physical reality is unknown, but it is why physicists are also suddenly taking an interest.
'
https://theconversat...nd-maths-136634
This post has been edited by Azath Vitr (D'ivers: 18 August 2020 - 02:59 AM