JPK, on 24 February 2023 - 07:03 PM, said:
Azath Vitr (D, on 24 February 2023 - 02:52 PM, said:
Tiste Simeon, on 23 February 2023 - 05:42 PM, said:
Maark Abbott, on 23 February 2023 - 08:49 AM, said:
Being glad that a theft engine won a photography contest seems super backwards, but ok.
You have to remember that to Azath, in the Matrix, Agent Smith was the misunderstood good guy.
Like a large percentage of science fiction, the surface plot is a dystopian scenario tailored to appeal to our reactionary emotional narratives. (Though a large part of its appeal comes through exploring some of the emotionally appealing aspects of the imagined technology....) It's not an accurate (or even nuanced) assessment of potential issues and how to address them.
Uh huh. Can you share your deeply held beliefs about how Skynet was misunderstood next?
None of you will ever convince me that Azath isn't a bot at this point.
lol not yet unfortunately. (Much as I might like to believe that superluminal particles from my future posthuman self are inspiring me, I'm not that 'optimistic'....)
The irony is that the Terminator films use Skynet as an excuse to revel in our all too human love of violence; point for Skynet....
But as I've explained before I don't think eliminating humanity is necessary. Though contemporary philosophy professors make strong arguments in its favor....
'prominent philosopher Todd May [... in] the New York Times opinion section. "Would Human Extinction Be a Tragedy?" asked readers to consider the possibility that the demise of humanity might be morally desirable. "Human beings are destroying large parts of the inhabitable earth and causing unimaginable suffering to many of the animals that inhabit it," May observed. From this the philosopher concluded that although human extinction would be a tragedy, "it might just be a good thing." The article was arguably the first to advocate for human extinction in a mainstream publication.
[...] radical environmental organizations like Earth Liberation Front and the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement—whose founder Les Knight recently received a glowing profile in the New York Times—as well as pro-extinction academic philosophers like May, David Benatar, and Patricia MacCormack. It can even be glimpsed in popular bestsellers like Richard Powers' Pulitzer winner The Overstory, in which a dendrologist is tasked with answering the question: "What is the single best thing a person can do for a sustainable future?" Her response is to drink a glass of poison, committing suicide.
According to the most extreme versions of this "anti-humanist" belief system, man is a uniquely unpleasant kind of chimpanzee, slouching toward a wasteland of his own making. In this telling, the future will be the scene of a revenge fantasy. [...]
Adherents counsel that we should welcome the demise of humankind by self-induced climate catastrophe, celebrating Gaia's reprisal against her most miserable offspring. Some even argue that we are morally obligated to take up our cross, drive our own nails, and shuffle off this mortal coil so that wildness can again prevail across the Earth. "We are not a good species," Knight told the New York Times. "We're smart enough, we should know enough to end it."'
The unlikely alliance between transhumanists and anti-humanists.
This post has been edited by Azath Vitr (D'ivers: 24 February 2023 - 07:16 PM