[Emurlahn]

I'd like a better explanation for Tennes than pure meta.

[Kaschan]

1 vote for Barghast (Gamelon)
2 vote for Tellan (Mockra, Korvalain)
1 vote for Mockra (Ruse)
1 vote for Hood's Path (Kaschan)
1 vote for Omtose (Emurlahn)
1 vote for Tennes (Barghast)

that's the latest, I believe
I'm not at all onvinced about Tennes. at least he contributes.
At this point, if we go for low/no-content, Hood's path is in the lead by a VERY wide margin

EDIT: Actually, Scratch that. Mockra's been equally quiet.

meh, Either one's good for me. But HP voted, so my vote stays where it is.

This post has been edited by Kaschan: 08 October 2008 - 08:45 PM

[Path-Shaper]

it is day 2 You have 23hours lleft.

There are 18 players remaining: Mockra, Omtose, Ruse, Serc, Korvalain, Fener, Galain, Gamelon, Hood's Path, Kaschan, Liosan, Shadow, Barghast, D'riss, Emurlahn,Tellan,Tennes, Thyrllan

10 votes are needed for a lynch
9 votes are needed to go to night

1 vote for Barghast (Gamelon)
2 vote for Tellan (Mockra, Korvalain)
1 vote for Mockra (Ruse)
1 vote for Hood's Path (Kaschan)
1 vote for Omtose (Emurlahn)
1 vote for Tennes (Barghast)
12 players have not voted: Omtose, Serc, Fener, Galain, Hood's Path, Liosan, Shadow, D'riss, Tellan,Tennes, Thyrllan

[Tellan]

So mockra and Korv seem to have a connection. Noone else seems to have followed their lead though. Is it possible the triad hit a grunt night one? If so, they're playing poorly.

Also, good point regarding the sudden change in Emur's playstyle. After I bring up that the first couple of fly-by votes on Telas looked suspicious and he starts quoting, making cases and making accusations.

[Omtose]

Emurlahn, on Oct 8 2008, 04:41 PM, said:

I'd like a better explanation for Tennes than pure meta.

What is the Meta case on him? did miss a deleted post or something?

And are you going to respond to my last post?

[Tellan]

The meta case is that Tennes got a replacement and Serc didnt. I put it out cos I thought it was wierd, I honestly didnt think people would go with it. It seems PS's post telling us not to read anything into that has just made it worse

[Kaschan]

Reverse psychology at its finest...
ok, so how many people think we should remove one of the people that contributes the least?

[Omtose]

Tellan, on Oct 8 2008, 04:51 PM, said:

The meta case is that Tennes got a replacement and Serc didnt. I put it out cos I thought it was wierd, I honestly didnt think people would go with it. It seems PS's post telling us not to read anything into that has just made it worse

AHH. I see. That could come in to play. Bummer they should have made some sort of effort on Serc then(I.E. them just playing him for a while)

[Omtose]

Kaschan, on Oct 8 2008, 04:53 PM, said:

Reverse psychology at its finest...
ok, so how many people think we should remove one of the people that contributes the least?

Too many times lately the lurker has been scum, so I'm for it.

[Emurlahn]

Omtose, on Oct 8 2008, 09:32 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on Oct 8 2008, 04:26 PM, said:

Well, forgive me for not trusting someone who refuses to post opinions etc. It's REALLY hard to decide who to vote for, as you say, but playing like that does not help, and makes me think you're trying to be inconspcious. I find it very hard to place you, as well as the lower posters, which makes me suspect you are not in a clan, and you are trying to be inconspicious. You see my problem?

Thats just it! I am trying to be inconspicuous. I don't want to draw any heat to my family, that includes me.

But I do have to retort. You hadn't said fuck all up till 4 and a half hours ago. You posted, but as you say no content.
Pot calling the kettle black maybe?

Why the aggressive change in style?

I'm not deliberately trying to be agressive. I just want to try to place people. You were being inconspicious. Not lurking, just posting a little. This made me suspicious. As you say, I wasnt a massive content poster yesterday, and I wanted to do more today. Also, my time was more limited today.

Your retort is just OMGUS. I accuse you of something, so you accuse me back.

I am just trying to see who is most suspicious.
You are, for me.
Although as I say, lowposters are bad aswell, but I cant place them as being deliberately inconspicious, which it seems to me, you are.

Edit: I try to respone when I have time. And I really dont like your response of "Yes im going to be unplaceable. Yes i'm not going to be placeable. Deal with it"
I obviously dont expect you to tell me your family etc.

I'm fine with getting a low poster. They are probably more inconspicious than you(omtose), and inconspicioussness seems to be the thing that FM/Triad is most likely to do.

This post has been edited by Emurlahn: 08 October 2008 - 09:00 PM

[Ruse]

To run down the current votelist:
Wouldn't mind offing either Mockra or Korvalain and see when/if the other guy jumps on the bandwagon. Tellan would be me compromising, he is a blip on the radar, so to speak, HP I can't even recall, bit of the same for Omtose apart from the fact that he is on this page. Barghast? Aside from the notion that he might be the FM, I haven't seen him do a lot. I think he said he comes from a different board, so I can't read him all that well. Gamelon aggressive? I'll have to reread to be sure of my own opinion, but you always need a player like that (which was why I wanted to keep DiBs around ).

Aside from all that, even with most people among the list, there are not a whole lot of people that I think I can lynch confidently in the knowledge that they're not in my faction. Tennes has not my preference, especially not since a new player is only just imported.

So, my vote remains on Mockra, unless we get a) a nice reveal, a train on Korvalain, c) no lynch unless I change vote. None of those seem very likely to happen, though.

[Kaschan]

also, Omtose, I realy don't see why you feel like you have to be quiet to be inconspicuous.
I mean, you're essentially a symp for your don (unless you are one), so your job's mostly to keep HIM alive. So as long as you don't show it to the world that he's your don, and there's o traceable connection, why NOT be loud? I mean, if other people decide youre a don and waste their donkills on you, wouldn't that be better that if they went to your don?

[Tellan]

I dont think I've ever seen voting off the lowest poster work out before. That said, mockra has four posts, of which two contains votes. That's pretty fishy in my book. Quotes coming shortly.

[Omtose]

Emurlahn, on Oct 8 2008, 04:57 PM, said:

Omtose, on Oct 8 2008, 09:32 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on Oct 8 2008, 04:26 PM, said:

Well, forgive me for not trusting someone who refuses to post opinions etc. It's REALLY hard to decide who to vote for, as you say, but playing like that does not help, and makes me think you're trying to be inconspcious. I find it very hard to place you, as well as the lower posters, which makes me suspect you are not in a clan, and you are trying to be inconspicious. You see my problem?

Thats just it! I am trying to be inconspicuous. I don't want to draw any heat to my family, that includes me.

But I do have to retort. You hadn't said fuck all up till 4 and a half hours ago. You posted, but as you say no content.
Pot calling the kettle black maybe?

Why the aggressive change in style?

I'm not deliberately trying to be agressive. I just want to try to place people. You were being inconspicious. Not lurking, just posting a little. This made me suspicious. As you say, I wasnt a massive content poster yesterday, and I wanted to do more today. Also, my time was more limited today.

Your retort is just OMGUS. I accuse you of something, so you accuse me back.

I am just trying to see who is most suspicious.
You are, for me.
Although as I say, lowposters are bad aswell, but I cant place them as being deliberately inconspicious, which it seems to me, you are.

No this is OMGUS
vote emurlahn


What I did was point out that you were doing the same thing.

[Kaschan]

that's REAL helpful, Omtose
I'm tempted to switch my vote now
seriously, grow up, omgus votes are generally day 1 business, I was hoping we were past that.

[Emurlahn]

You're right. That is OMGUS.
I was being inconcpicious, because I had little to talk about, after making my opinion known early.

I also had:

Large time restrictions. I was able to be on A LOT more today than yesterday. I had: Bed, school, basketball match(in another city, hours away) back, a few hours on(if my parents let me), bed again. See my problem? Edit: yesterday that is.
Now, I am not trying to be inconcpicious. I just dont mention what family I am, or obviously symp someone.

What irks me about you is that you dont really voice any opinions. Which, by the way, I do. Ask me my opinion, and i'll tell you it. Rather than just saying "Im not saying anything that may reveal anything about my alignment". If you start contributing, then i'll stop complaining. Unless(obviously) you just start repeating other people to try and be more inconspicious by being less inconspicious.

If you get me.

As an aside, tommorow time wise isnt great for me either.

This post has been edited by Emurlahn: 08 October 2008 - 09:07 PM

[Omtose]

Kaschan, on Oct 8 2008, 04:59 PM, said:

also, Omtose, I realy don't see why you feel like you have to be quiet to be inconspicuous.
I mean, you're essentially a symp for your don (unless you are one), so your job's mostly to keep HIM alive. So as long as you don't show it to the world that he's your don, and there's o traceable connection, why NOT be loud? I mean, if other people decide youre a don and waste their donkills on you, wouldn't that be better that if they went to your don?

Quote

why NOT be loud? I mean, if other people decide youre a don and waste their donkills on you, wouldn't that be better that if they went to your don?

That works for being quit also.DUH. as is my don is not being threatened at the moment, so I feel no need to try to save a man from drowning on dry land.

spelling edit

This post has been edited by Omtose: 08 October 2008 - 09:07 PM

[Tellan]

Uhm, how does the new multiquote work? I've clicked the quote button on all of Mockra's posts, what do I click next?