Malazan Empire: Mafia 27: The Escape of the Benses (Game Thread) - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 59 Pages +
  • « First
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Mafia 27: The Escape of the Benses (Game Thread)

#241 Guest_D'riss_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 08:18 AM

Barghast;374670 said:

How is pointing out a probable pair of roled innocents a nice find?

Why would we be hanging Omtose first? If Omtose confirms that he and Mockra are partners and their role then the person we will be hanging will probably be Ruse, or perhaps you for pointing out what a great find it is.


The pointing out is no nice find. Nor did I say that. Stop making a bogus argument on what you preceive as the general gist of my argument.

Finding extra information is a nice find, and I'll stand by it.
But that's all, for I disagree with what happened next (revealing it). What Ruse should have done is keep it secret (as I said), analyze it, and try to determine what the relation/ role is. If he became convinced they were Finders, our most powerful tool, well, Ruse (assuming he's an inno) could then follow their lead and support them, or divert attention away from them when they came under fire. Wouldn't be the first time an inno who has decrypted a Finder code acted as their symp (or rather, helpful innocent bystander, to steer away from scummy role names).

Quote

If Omtose has no clue about Mockra then we lynch Mockra for coding some elses name in when they're not paired and then see what the CF tells us from that.

Sure. And if he is guilty, Omtose will (90% chance) also say he hasn't got a clue why his name was coded, just to avoid becoming a target. When they are partnered, they may do the exact same thing to distance.

Quote

I'd say its pretty far fetched that Team Evil would waste their time with a code or pretending to be a roled pair when it can be so easily refuted. I could be wrong, but its rather unlikely.

I agree with the first part, especially how team evil knows each other from the outset, however, all we have is a one-way-connection. Since there's no real clue in the game's description which inno roles are paired and which aren't, I'd say the scum might try it or keep it open as an escapehatch.

Also because BB will survive his first lynch/vig-kill, a fake reveal followed by a counter would give him a great deal of information at a relatively low price - far lower than in a normal game.
0

#242 Guest_Telas_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 08:18 AM

Here, just reading up.
0

#243 Guest_D'riss_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 08:33 AM

@ Barghast: as for hanging Omtose first... I find Ruse's reasoning relatively reasonable in his case/ codebreak as to why BB would be the one whose name was coded.

More, if we hang UB, then we get an inno result and a lot of WIFOM for day 2 whether or not UB is dead. We'll know for certain if we catch BB - who will then soulshift.

Best if none of our finders have revealed up to that moment, or he will soulshift into one, then NK the other, ask for a heal from the healers for the remainder of the game 'while he searches', and so protect himself against the vigs while he picks off all the others one by one.
0

#244 Guest_Mockra_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 08:37 AM

vote ruse
for exposing lovers to his master.

yea i fucked up...omtose told me not to put in a code but i had already done it, and it was a shit easy code aswell (i was SERIOUSLY hungover gimme a break). I didnt expect there to be a rabbid post searching person looking for codes.

My only conclusion is that either BB or UB would be looking for codes since he knows that there are lovers.
UB would have to signal his master to kill one of us somehow, so i suggest we lynch ruse for outing lovers.

My bad for the codes..sorry omtose

Why would any symp EVER code his masters name in his posts.
Its something only innos do. And no inno would ever out someone if he spots a code.
Onloy innos code. A symp MIGHT code but he would only reveal after the person he coded dies. So if ruse was inno he sould have waited till mockra died at least.

we are a pair of lovers, i am not going to tell you our powers as we can still potentially block a night kill. If the killers are brave enough.

I also urge the healer to heal one of us tonight wich will increase our chances of blocking a night kill by allot more.

Once again my humblest apologies to omtose for my fuck up.
0

#245 Guest_Path-Shaper_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 08:42 AM

It is day 1, 6 hours and 15 minutes left

15 players alive, 8 to lynch and to go to night

1 vote Shadow (Omtose)
3 votes Omtose (Shadow, Galain, Ruse)
3 votes Fener (Gamelon, Kaschan, D'riss)
1 vote Ruse (Mockra)

7 have not voted (Barghast, Fener, Hoods Path, Liosan, Serc, Telas, Tennes)
0

#246 Guest_Mockra_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 08:45 AM

Shadow, galain and Ruse.

Id bet a case of beer that one of these is scum.
Driss aswell, for LOVING how ruse outed the lovers.
0

#247 Guest_Hoods Path_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 08:48 AM

If you ARE the finder, and revealing Omtose as your partner, then what we shouldn't do is lynch one of you as the BB would kill of the other one. This assuming your "reveal" is accurate. But what if you're pulling our legs? Anybody thinking that Mockra ISN'T the finder? Not that the "true" finders, if any are going to reveal themselves. Not that I'm saying I'm a finder. Quoting The Shawshank Redemption:
Everybody in here's innocent.
0

#248 Guest_Mockra_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 08:53 AM

ok...well let me tell you we are NOT the finders.

So thats why i am not too worried about revealing.
But i didnt reveal, Ruse OUTED us.

Sorry...but who the hell looks for codes when you are innocent?
Only time i have ever looked for codes is when i was scum and was trying to find lovers.
0

#249 Guest_Telas_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 09:00 AM

Barghast;374661 said:

I was just going to post and say that I think Omtose and Shadow are two innocents with wires crossed. There isn't anything particular damning in either of their cases as I think both would agree.

However Ruse... WTF? Are you trying to pull a Khell?

You've basically forced them to come out now. Its really unlikely an evil guy is going to have codes and come out like that. If they claim Finder and there are Finders already out there they will counter claim and will be caught out. Sure we will have to lynch one of each, but it will be obvious and we have enough numbers to lose 3 or 4 innocents and still be in a heathly position if we get an evil from it.

We might have to lynch you now Ruse for being potentially Uncle Ben and sending a message to Big Ben saying you found paired innocents and thusly a powerful role and thought it was worth the sacrifice. It being so early on though you might just get away with it.


Still I guess lets hear from Omtose and Mockra and see what they have to say.


Who's not these days, eh? ;)


I can't see why either UB or BB would want to code their partner's name - as has been pointed out it can't be a signal because they already know of each other.

However, it seems to me that Ruse is more an inno who got a bit eager to point something at Omtose because Omtose had targeted him - than an actual evil.


Could Fener elaborate on his explanation, please. He saw the same quote in the previous Benses game and decided to copy it, is that it? If so, it does seem like a bit of a tragic coincidence right now.

Back to Ruse/Mockra/Omtose. Having just read up on the thread, I can't say I've been too happy with Omtose's tactics, but it still struck me as a particularly aggressive inno. It seems to me that the evils would keep their heads down more than that. There's no real surprise with Mockra agreeing with Omtose - he's backing up his partner. Galain was the one who was suspicious to me at first, because of the amount of gloating he seemed to do over Kaschan's condition, but no one's going to go with that right now, so I'll drop it.

I'm sorry, Ruse, I just don't see what reason Mockra would have to code Omtose's name if they were both evil. I think a fake reveal at some point down the road is too complicated a notion.
0

#250 Guest_Barghast_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 09:02 AM

Mockra;374684 said:

Shadow, galain and Ruse.

Id bet a case of beer that one of these is scum.
Driss aswell, for LOVING how ruse outed the lovers.



I'd add Gamelon to that list as well. Not sure about Galain though. D'riss seems a likely scummy sort.

I think Mockra though, you are going to have to reveal your role. Everyone with a role is still alive so we can confirm if you are telling the truth or not. There is no doubt you and Omtose are going to be targeted so hiding what role is pretty pointless.

Anyway I think I have to vote Ruse as well but could change to D'riss.

Vote Ruse
0

#251 Guest_D'riss_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 09:05 AM

Mockra;374684 said:

Shadow, galain and Ruse.

Id bet a case of beer that one of these is scum.
Driss aswell, for LOVING how ruse outed the lovers.

Sigh. Think of me what you will, but I pointed out already to Barghast that I thought it was a good find by Ruse by himself - but thought the entire follow-up unwise.
0

#252 Guest_Barghast_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 09:07 AM

Actually Mockra I'll take that back after some more thinking. I am happy enough that you and Omtose are innocent, and I'd rather keep BB and UB guessing.

Not sure if it will matter much mind you though.
0

#253 Guest_Mockra_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 09:08 AM

Barghast;374691 said:

I think Mockra though, you are going to have to reveal your role.


I dont see any reason why we should.
If we can prove that we can communicate off thread it should be enough.

Revealing exactly what our role can do is just helping the scumm if you ask me?

In fact why do you insist?
0

#254 Guest_Mockra_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 09:12 AM

Barghast;374695 said:

Actually Mockra I'll take that back after some more thinking. I am happy enough that you and Omtose are innocent, and I'd rather keep BB and UB guessing.

Not sure if it will matter much mind you though.


aah mkay
0

#255 Guest_Barghast_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 09:14 AM

Mockra;374696 said:

I dont see any reason why we should.
If we can prove that we can communicate off thread it should be enough.

Revealing exactly what our role can do is just helping the scumm if you ask me?

In fact why do you insist?


I read Hoods Path post about not trusting the reveal and went with that. Then I read the roles post and saw that UB and BB can't communicate between each other and changed my mind. Its my next post down you'll see it soon ;)
0

#256 Guest_Tennes_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 09:22 AM

Mockra;374696 said:

I dont see any reason why we should.
If we can prove that we can communicate off thread it should be enough.

Revealing exactly what our role can do is just helping the scumm if you ask me?

In fact why do you insist?


dont reveal your role, proving you can comm off thread is more than enough prove as a symp shouldnt be able to speak to his master. As to why a killer might code a name randomly, if mockra was BB and killed omtose tonight he could reveal later int he game as a paired player if under pressure. Dubious tactic, but a straightforward code in your first post is suicide territory when there are obviously players lookign out for that sort of thing.

As to the fener argument, i find it slightly ridiculous that people are voting for him, seriously we have all been roled before, how often do we just send a name to path shaper with our action beside it. Explanations are in the build up maybe, but the game hadnt even started yet.

It is also very doubtful that ja would simply forward the message on. Like any mod the fun is in the execution and embellishing or revelling in an action taking place is the whole point of modding.

As for my bet on who is evil, i am inclined to believe ruse, omtose and mockra are innos who are just very unlucky. Fener could well be UB or BB, but the reason cited is too ridiculous for me to warranta vote on it.

Personally i find shadow the most suspicious

Shadow;374616 said:

Ahem.

So let me get this straight, because I find you suspicious, and use your own words against you, I get labeled as straw manning, a term that has never before been used in mafia history, yet labeled nonetheless. And you say that I am suspicious for that? Give me a break, this has to be the worst reasoning I have ever heard. But enough with the pissing contest, you and I clearly don't see eye to eye, so I am content with leaving you with this, I am watching you my friend, and waiting for one slip to nail you on. That doesn't mean that I have to be close-minded about the rest of the game.

Fener, you are at L-4 with 13.5 hours left(or so), I choose to leave my vote where it is, if it comes down to it, I will hammer you though, so hopefully you make a good defense. Might I sugest voting against Omtose and saying that he is Big Ben, a more important bad guy than Uncle Ben?;) Anyway, I'll be back in 10 to 12 hours, to see what happened and perhaps recast my vote.



mostly because of this. He is pointing out a dire situation that a player is in, offering them a helpful hint in trying to extracate them self from it, but claiming he will hamemr them. That sounds like something a symp would do, especially when their master is a soul shifter. He could even be BB and fener is actually UB, i am not sure, but with omtose being PI, shadow by disassociation looks more guilty in my mind and this post stood out to me as particularly scummy.
0

#257 Guest_Mockra_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 09:22 AM

So what do you guys make of the fact that ruse was looking for codes?
0

#258 Guest_Tennes_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 09:23 AM

vote shadow

Knew i forgot something.
0

#259 Guest_Telas_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 09:25 AM

Mockra;374703 said:

So what do you guys make of the fact that ruse was looking for codes?


I think it was a player who had Omtose on the brain after that player's attacks on him. I agree with Tennes that this seems to be between three unlucky innos.
0

#260 Guest_Galain_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 09:26 AM

remove voteif that code was scum, it is well played. I don't buy it as scum though.
0

Share this topic:


  • 59 Pages +
  • « First
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users