The MAFIA MOD thread
#1381
Posted 08 March 2012 - 12:36 PM
oh, I'll be wanting a co-mod, I'm GMT - 8, but my online times are like early morning and then all evening. I can get online at work but via a phone
2012
"Imperial Gothos, Imperial"
"Imperial Gothos, Imperial"
#1382
Posted 08 March 2012 - 12:50 PM
#1383
Posted 08 March 2012 - 01:18 PM
sounds good, i'll pm you with a google doc or something in a day or two when i get the main ideas fleshed out a bit more you can see what you think of the setup.
2012
"Imperial Gothos, Imperial"
"Imperial Gothos, Imperial"
#1384
Posted 08 March 2012 - 10:01 PM
I've put down more details about B:AA I will warn people here, in the signup thread and the game theread, there will be
SPOILERS FOR THE GAME. THE BATMAN: ARKHAM CITY GAME. MANY, MANY, SPOILERS, INCLUDING A LOT OF THE STUFF THAT HAPPENED IN THE GAME SPOILERS.
ahem. so yeah.
once the Newb game wraps up, I suggest Shin opens signups, since his Sengoku game is next, I believe?
SPOILERS FOR THE GAME. THE BATMAN: ARKHAM CITY GAME. MANY, MANY, SPOILERS, INCLUDING A LOT OF THE STUFF THAT HAPPENED IN THE GAME SPOILERS.
ahem. so yeah.
once the Newb game wraps up, I suggest Shin opens signups, since his Sengoku game is next, I believe?
This post has been edited by Mentalist: 08 March 2012 - 10:02 PM
#1385
Posted 09 March 2012 - 12:11 AM
So right now we're looking at...
Shin's first. Tapper said he wanted his to be pretty soon, and it is a mini, so it should probably go after Shin's. Then Ment's and D'reks, unless D'rek wants to push hers farther back. We also have mine and Dinivan's Zombies game, which is practically done already. We wanted to run it late march/early april for a few reasons, but that doesn't seem possible looking at the volume and size of games in front of us.
Shin's first. Tapper said he wanted his to be pretty soon, and it is a mini, so it should probably go after Shin's. Then Ment's and D'reks, unless D'rek wants to push hers farther back. We also have mine and Dinivan's Zombies game, which is practically done already. We wanted to run it late march/early april for a few reasons, but that doesn't seem possible looking at the volume and size of games in front of us.
#1386
Posted 09 March 2012 - 12:56 AM
JLV, on 09 March 2012 - 12:11 AM, said:
So right now we're looking at...
Shin's first. Tapper said he wanted his to be pretty soon, and it is a mini, so it should probably go after Shin's. Then Ment's and D'reks, unless D'rek wants to push hers farther back. We also have mine and Dinivan's Zombies game, which is practically done already. We wanted to run it late march/early april for a few reasons, but that doesn't seem possible looking at the volume and size of games in front of us.
Shin's first. Tapper said he wanted his to be pretty soon, and it is a mini, so it should probably go after Shin's. Then Ment's and D'reks, unless D'rek wants to push hers farther back. We also have mine and Dinivan's Zombies game, which is practically done already. We wanted to run it late march/early april for a few reasons, but that doesn't seem possible looking at the volume and size of games in front of us.
Ehm, the number of players is 14, but the pace is probably not going to be that of a mini (aka less than a week). I expect 10 (normal) days or so. Just to warn y'all.
Everyone is entitled to his own wrong opinion. - Lizrad
#1387
Posted 09 March 2012 - 05:41 AM
Hey, in my case I'm totally flexible at the moment. If others need to run theirs first for RL schedule reasons, by all means you can bump me down one or two spots.
You’ve never heard of the Silanda? … It’s the ship that made the Warren of Telas run in less than 12 parsecs.
#1388
Posted 09 March 2012 - 06:38 AM
hrm
my only consideration is, my finals start on the week of April 9th. so, from about the 6th, I intend to drop off the face of the earth. Once I get home, my future (and thus, my net access time) is uncertain.
I'd prefer to run B:AA in late march/early April.
my only consideration is, my finals start on the week of April 9th. so, from about the 6th, I intend to drop off the face of the earth. Once I get home, my future (and thus, my net access time) is uncertain.
I'd prefer to run B:AA in late march/early April.
#1389
Posted 09 March 2012 - 11:04 PM
I'm far down the list. Up to you guys to figure out who is next.
#1390
Posted 10 March 2012 - 12:01 AM
with the Newb game completed, I suggest Shinshin opens sgnups when he reads this.
#1391
Posted 12 March 2012 - 08:25 AM
For the record, I'd love to sign up or run a game, but my connection has been purest bollocks for about four months, and my ISP pretends they can't do anything about it.
So, maybe some day in the better future.
So, maybe some day in the better future.
I finally have an avatar ... and it's better than yours.
#1392
Posted 12 March 2012 - 08:28 AM
Kurt Montandon, on 12 March 2012 - 08:25 AM, said:
For the record, I'd love to sign up or run a game, but my connection has been purest bollocks for about four months, and my ISP pretends they can't do anything about it.
So, maybe some day in the better future.
So, maybe some day in the better future.
New sign ups are up, even if you will be a filthy low poster
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
#1393
Posted 15 March 2012 - 09:16 PM
I just want to say that I need to find a way to play again at some point. I've had so many balance help requests in the last month+ and I have been really impressed by the sheer number of ideas you guys have for games. Would be nice to play (or, if I even wish to revisit that torture chamber, mod) a game again.
#1394
#1395
Posted 16 March 2012 - 02:54 PM
I'd like to try running a TMDI 1 mini. Going to make it as basic as I possibly can. Let's say either 12 or 16 players.
ST
ST
Don't look now, but I think there's something weird attached to the bottom of my posts.
#1396
Posted 16 March 2012 - 05:33 PM
Zombies is ready to go, btw, so you can move that whenever you have a chance. I'm excited, the wait to run this baby is looking long though.
#1397
Posted 17 March 2012 - 01:35 PM
I still think we are almost at critical mass such that two games could go simultaneously on a regular basis.
"You don't clean u other peoples messes.... You roll in them like a dog on leftover smoked whitefish torn out f the trash by raccoons after Sunday brunch on a hot day."
~Abyss
~Abyss
#1398
Posted 18 March 2012 - 11:20 PM
Gust Hubb, on 17 March 2012 - 01:35 PM, said:
I still think we are almost at critical mass such that two games could go simultaneously on a regular basis.
I kind of hate that idea but I guess if we have too many people then we may have to.
Eh. Shrug.
We sail in and out of Time, then back again. There is only one ship, the captain says. All the ships we hail between the galaxies or suns are this ship.
#1399
Posted 18 March 2012 - 11:24 PM
Most people are just making bigger games. I know mine can take 20, preferably 24, and can go up to 27.
#1400
Posted 18 March 2012 - 11:29 PM
JLV, on 18 March 2012 - 11:24 PM, said:
Most people are just making bigger games. I know mine can take 20, preferably 24, and can go up to 27.
Now this is something I can get behind. Big games get crazy but two games at once...depresses me for some reason. Even when I'm not playing. The noob/vet game being an exception.
We sail in and out of Time, then back again. There is only one ship, the captain says. All the ships we hail between the galaxies or suns are this ship.