The Book I bought today is...
#1841
Posted 04 July 2011 - 11:06 AM
I got the SF Masterworks hardback editions of The Man In The High Castle by Philip K. Dick and Childhood's End by Arthur C. Clarke.
#1842
Posted 04 July 2011 - 11:22 AM
@ serenity - I liked Childhood's End, but I must say it didn't wow me as much as either "The City and the Stars" (for it's technological prescience) or "Rendezvous with Rama" for a good sci-fi mysterious adventure. Still, he had some great ideas in his books.
I recently got The Wise Man's Fear, by Patrick Rothfuss, and think i may start it tonight.
I recently got The Wise Man's Fear, by Patrick Rothfuss, and think i may start it tonight.
It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt - Mark Twain
Never argue with an idiot!
They'll drag you down to their level, and then beat you with experience!- Anonymous
#1843
Posted 04 July 2011 - 11:46 AM
Binder of Demons, on 04 July 2011 - 11:22 AM, said:
@ serenity - I liked Childhood's End, but I must say it didn't wow me as much as either "The City and the Stars" (for it's technological prescience) or "Rendezvous with Rama" for a good sci-fi mysterious adventure. Still, he had some great ideas in his books.
Yeah, I've read Rendezvous With Rama - must now get The City and the Stars as well, thanks for the tip.
#1844
Posted 04 July 2011 - 12:17 PM
@ Serenity - There are a couple of versions of the same story that makes up the majority of "The City and the Stars". City and the Stars was a substantial rewrite of Clarke's first novel/novella, "Against the Fall of Night". To be honest, it's so long since i read them, that I couldn't tell you the difference between the two. I have one further caveat regarding recommending any Arthur C Clarke, and that is that his writing style is perfunctory at best (and this is from someone who has every one of his published novels). He really is an ideas person, and that's why I loved them as a kid. nice simple writing style, and some great speculative ideas, far ahead of his time.
"Rendezvous With Rama" is probably his only novel that I would feel comfortable recommending to someone more used to modern sci-fi.
But if you enjoy "Childhood's End", then definitely check out either "Against the Fall of Night" of "City and the Stars".
"Rendezvous With Rama" is probably his only novel that I would feel comfortable recommending to someone more used to modern sci-fi.
But if you enjoy "Childhood's End", then definitely check out either "Against the Fall of Night" of "City and the Stars".
It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt - Mark Twain
Never argue with an idiot!
They'll drag you down to their level, and then beat you with experience!- Anonymous
#1845
Posted 04 July 2011 - 12:34 PM
Binder of Demons, on 04 July 2011 - 12:17 PM, said:
@ Serenity - There are a couple of versions of the same story that makes up the majority of "The City and the Stars". City and the Stars was a substantial rewrite of Clarke's first novel/novella, "Against the Fall of Night". To be honest, it's so long since i read them, that I couldn't tell you the difference between the two. I have one further caveat regarding recommending any Arthur C Clarke, and that is that his writing style is perfunctory at best (and this is from someone who has every one of his published novels). He really is an ideas person, and that's why I loved them as a kid. nice simple writing style, and some great speculative ideas, far ahead of his time.
"Rendezvous With Rama" is probably his only novel that I would feel comfortable recommending to someone more used to modern sci-fi.
But if you enjoy "Childhood's End", then definitely check out either "Against the Fall of Night" of "City and the Stars".
"Rendezvous With Rama" is probably his only novel that I would feel comfortable recommending to someone more used to modern sci-fi.
But if you enjoy "Childhood's End", then definitely check out either "Against the Fall of Night" of "City and the Stars".
Thanks for this, BoD. Just on the basis of Rendezvous With Rama I can totally see what you're saying about his writing style. I'll give them a go, though - I do like older sf (still quoting Bester's The Stars My Destination as a favourite), so hopefully I'll enjoy them.
#1846
Posted 04 July 2011 - 01:12 PM
@ Serenity - You're welcome. That Sci-Fi Masterworks series has some great novels, but it can be a bit of a lucky dip.
I would count Bester's "The Stars My Destination" as one of my favourite novels ever, but that has a very modern writing style in comparison to most other books on the list. If you liked that, then check out his other book on the list, "The Demolished Man" which deals with telepathy and has been ripped off by too many books, movies and tv shows to count.
A friend of Bester is also on the list, Roger Zelazny, with "Lord of Light". Lord of Light divides opinion on this forum, but I think it is awesome. For someone used to reading Erikson, the complexity of the story and the jumping backwards and forwards in time shouldn't be an issue.
Dune is the other classic on that list which has a modern writing style and holds up amazingly well.
A very odd couple of books on the masterworks list are "Last and First Man" and "Starmaker" by Olaf Stapledon. Last and First Man is only ok to be honest, but does show great imagination and scope. However in "Starmaker" he's harnessed that imagination and tells a far more coherent story, which also has a very poetic feel.
I would count Bester's "The Stars My Destination" as one of my favourite novels ever, but that has a very modern writing style in comparison to most other books on the list. If you liked that, then check out his other book on the list, "The Demolished Man" which deals with telepathy and has been ripped off by too many books, movies and tv shows to count.
A friend of Bester is also on the list, Roger Zelazny, with "Lord of Light". Lord of Light divides opinion on this forum, but I think it is awesome. For someone used to reading Erikson, the complexity of the story and the jumping backwards and forwards in time shouldn't be an issue.
Dune is the other classic on that list which has a modern writing style and holds up amazingly well.
A very odd couple of books on the masterworks list are "Last and First Man" and "Starmaker" by Olaf Stapledon. Last and First Man is only ok to be honest, but does show great imagination and scope. However in "Starmaker" he's harnessed that imagination and tells a far more coherent story, which also has a very poetic feel.
It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt - Mark Twain
Never argue with an idiot!
They'll drag you down to their level, and then beat you with experience!- Anonymous
#1847
Posted 04 July 2011 - 01:30 PM
Binder of Demons, on 04 July 2011 - 01:12 PM, said:
@ Serenity - You're welcome. That Sci-Fi Masterworks series has some great novels, but it can be a bit of a lucky dip.
I would count Bester's "The Stars My Destination" as one of my favourite novels ever, but that has a very modern writing style in comparison to most other books on the list. If you liked that, then check out his other book on the list, "The Demolished Man" which deals with telepathy and has been ripped off by too many books, movies and tv shows to count.
A friend of Bester is also on the list, Roger Zelazny, with "Lord of Light". Lord of Light divides opinion on this forum, but I think it is awesome. For someone used to reading Erikson, the complexity of the story and the jumping backwards and forwards in time shouldn't be an issue.
Dune is the other classic on that list which has a modern writing style and holds up amazingly well.
I would count Bester's "The Stars My Destination" as one of my favourite novels ever, but that has a very modern writing style in comparison to most other books on the list. If you liked that, then check out his other book on the list, "The Demolished Man" which deals with telepathy and has been ripped off by too many books, movies and tv shows to count.
A friend of Bester is also on the list, Roger Zelazny, with "Lord of Light". Lord of Light divides opinion on this forum, but I think it is awesome. For someone used to reading Erikson, the complexity of the story and the jumping backwards and forwards in time shouldn't be an issue.
Dune is the other classic on that list which has a modern writing style and holds up amazingly well.
Funnily enough, I re-read Dune last year having first read it about 30 years ago, and again I totally agree, it's still a fantastic read. I also read The Demolished Man last year and enjoyed it a lot, although not as much as Gully Foyle's adventures - possibly because, as you say, it's an idea that has been done-to-death in the intervening years.
I've even got Lord of Light sitting on the shelf, although I haven't read it as yet. I've actually got a whole shelf full of the SF and Fantasy Masterworks books, of which the previously mentioned novels, The Forever War and I Am Legend have been my favourites. So far I've stuck to those which have been generally well-reviewed/received. I still have several I need to read, though. One I genuinely didn't enjoy was Earth Abides by George R. Stewart. It seemed very dry to me, and not very involving. Again, this may be down to the writing style, or possibly I just wasn't in the mood for it at the time.
#1848
Posted 04 July 2011 - 07:55 PM
@Stone Monkey: I read Never Let Me Go a few years back and I did enjoy it, though it took me a while to get into it. It's not on my "best ever" list but it's a good, original story.
As for me, I bought Keith Richards' autobiography. I'm not even a big Stones fan but I assume this will be an entertaining read.
As for me, I bought Keith Richards' autobiography. I'm not even a big Stones fan but I assume this will be an entertaining read.
This post has been edited by Maia Irraz: 04 July 2011 - 07:56 PM
~ Denn die Toten reiten schnell. (Lenore)
#1849
Posted 04 July 2011 - 09:24 PM
I bought the first two books of the Gap series. Will this ever move away from RAPE! and ANGST ABOUT MORE RAPE! ... and MORE RAPE!.. ?
Take good care to keep relations civil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
#1850
Posted 05 July 2011 - 02:52 AM
Morgoth, on 04 July 2011 - 09:24 PM, said:
I bought the first two books of the Gap series. Will this ever move away from RAPE! and ANGST ABOUT MORE RAPE! ... and MORE RAPE!.. ?
Yes. The first two books mostly set up the characters and the situation. The plot proper arrives in book #3 and doesn't let up until the end.
"Here is light. You will say that it is not a living entity, but you miss the point that it is more, not less. Without occupying space, it fills the universe. It nourishes everything, yet itself feeds upon destruction. We claim to control it, but does it not perhaps cultivate us as a source of food? May it not be that all wood grows so that it can be set ablaze, and that men and women are born to kindle fires?"
―Gene Wolfe, The Citadel of the Autarch
―Gene Wolfe, The Citadel of the Autarch
#1851
Posted 05 July 2011 - 01:48 PM
Picked up DRAGON WING (Book 1 of the Deathgate Cycle) by Weis and Hickman
DRAGON - Steven Brust
DRAGON - Steven Brust
"When the last tree has fallen, and the rivers are poisoned, you cannot eat money, oh no." ~Aurora
"Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone." ~Ursula Vernon
"Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone." ~Ursula Vernon
#1852
Posted 05 July 2011 - 08:40 PM
Morgoth, on 04 July 2011 - 09:24 PM, said:
I bought the first two books of the Gap series. Will this ever move away from RAPE! and ANGST ABOUT MORE RAPE! ... and MORE RAPE!.. ?
Er... Sort of... It simply becomes a different kind (more metaphorical) of rape as it goes on.
But yeah, the whole thing is a kind of superheated melodrama that never lets up. If you think at any one moment the characters are as on the edge as they could possibly be, you'll soon learn the error of your ways.
If an opinion contrary to your own makes you angry, that is a sign that you are subconsciously aware of having no good reason for thinking as you do. If some one maintains that two and two are five, or that Iceland is on the equator, you feel pity rather than anger, unless you know so little of arithmetic or geography that his opinion shakes your own contrary conviction. … So whenever you find yourself getting angry about a difference of opinion, be on your guard; you will probably find, on examination, that your belief is going beyond what the evidence warrants. Bertrand Russell
#1853
Posted 05 July 2011 - 08:57 PM
Abyss, on 29 June 2011 - 03:41 PM, said:
No doubt for similar reasons.
Mind, hind, what's the difference?
Oh yes best time to refresh the page is after you post
This post has been edited by Illuyankas: 05 July 2011 - 08:58 PM
Hello, soldiers, look at your mage, now back to me, now back at your mage, now back to me. Sadly, he isn’t me, but if he stopped being an unascended mortal and switched to Sole Spice, he could smell like he’s me. Look down, back up, where are you? You’re in a warren with the High Mage your cadre mage could smell like. What’s in your hand, back at me. I have it, it’s an acorn with two gates to that realm you love. Look again, the acorn is now otataral. Anything is possible when your mage smells like Sole Spice and not a Bole brother. I’m on a quorl.
#1854
Posted 06 July 2011 - 02:19 AM
Morgoth, on 04 July 2011 - 09:24 PM, said:
I bought the first two books of the Gap series. Will this ever move away from RAPE! and ANGST ABOUT MORE RAPE! ... and MORE RAPE!.. ?
It will not move from ANGST! The first half of the series is about RAPE! and the second half of the series is about IMPRISONMENT!
I'm not a Gap liker - although I very much like the Covenant books.
I survived the Permian and all I got was this t-shirt.
#1855
Posted 06 July 2011 - 05:28 PM
The Death Gate cycle books were awesome when i read them many years back... very different from the dragonlance stuff... almost re-read them when i was back in South Africa but opted to raid my brothers graphic novels ;o)
This post has been edited by Silk: 06 July 2011 - 06:17 PM
#1856
Posted 11 July 2011 - 07:38 PM
From the clearance rack at Half Price Books today:
Armor by John Steakley
Off Armageddon Reef by David Weber
Gears of War: Aspho Fields by Karen Traviss
The Forever War by Joe Haldeman
Armor by John Steakley
Off Armageddon Reef by David Weber
Gears of War: Aspho Fields by Karen Traviss
The Forever War by Joe Haldeman
"Here is light. You will say that it is not a living entity, but you miss the point that it is more, not less. Without occupying space, it fills the universe. It nourishes everything, yet itself feeds upon destruction. We claim to control it, but does it not perhaps cultivate us as a source of food? May it not be that all wood grows so that it can be set ablaze, and that men and women are born to kindle fires?"
―Gene Wolfe, The Citadel of the Autarch
―Gene Wolfe, The Citadel of the Autarch
#1857
#1858
Posted 11 July 2011 - 07:41 PM
“The others followed, and found themselves in a small, stuffy basement, which would have been damp, smelly, close, and dark, were it not, in fact, well-lit, which prevented it from being dark.”
― Steven Brust, The Phoenix Guards
― Steven Brust, The Phoenix Guards
#1859
Posted 11 July 2011 - 08:10 PM
acesn8s, on 11 July 2011 - 07:41 PM, said:
Wait...his name is Steakley and he wrote Vampire books?
Stakely?
No way. LOL.
He had two options. Vampire fiction writer, or food critic.
...or pirate.
"When the last tree has fallen, and the rivers are poisoned, you cannot eat money, oh no." ~Aurora
"Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone." ~Ursula Vernon
"Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone." ~Ursula Vernon
#1860
Posted 11 July 2011 - 08:23 PM
QuickTidal, on 11 July 2011 - 08:10 PM, said:
Yeah, John Carpenter 's Vampires movie was based off Vampire$.
“The others followed, and found themselves in a small, stuffy basement, which would have been damp, smelly, close, and dark, were it not, in fact, well-lit, which prevented it from being dark.”
― Steven Brust, The Phoenix Guards
― Steven Brust, The Phoenix Guards