K'Chain Che'Malle gods?
#21
Posted 02 August 2006 - 03:24 PM
Abyss, we've been theorizing on this before, no way to say for sure either way. I guess we'll have to wait and see.
Dol Men: Kaschan made me think Rashan... but I doubt there's any connection.
Dol Men: Kaschan made me think Rashan... but I doubt there's any connection.
#22
Posted 02 August 2006 - 03:26 PM
This does counter the theory of K'rul creating the warren for the destroyed continent. In the prologue of MoI it is said that the Imperial Warren was created solely for this purpose by the three Elder Gods.
#23
Posted 02 August 2006 - 05:35 PM
Is that the actual quote, or a parpharse, because i though, vague recall without book handy, that Krul said he would take the damaged continent into himself, not that he was fashioning a specific warren for it. And even then, that doesn't preclude him taking the presumably deserted KC warren and doing something new with it.
- Abyss, now THAT's a reno.
- Abyss, now THAT's a reno.
THIS IS YOUR REMINDER THAT THERE IS A
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
#24
Posted 02 August 2006 - 05:40 PM
It's a quote;
"They merged their power to draw chains around a continent of slaughter, then pulled it into a warren created for that sole purpose, leaving the land itself bared."
"They merged their power to draw chains around a continent of slaughter, then pulled it into a warren created for that sole purpose, leaving the land itself bared."
#25
Posted 02 August 2006 - 06:16 PM
I think there is a plausible connection though - Kallor is believed to have destroyed his empire with an unknown KCCM artifact (at least this is the prevalent theory). So it seems natural that the continent devastated by KCCM tech/magic would be "folded into" the already barren KCCM warren.
Sound reasonable?
Sound reasonable?
#26
Posted 02 August 2006 - 06:35 PM
Dol'Men - Good point. Tho' now i'm all suspicious at the use of the word 'chains' there. 
It's always been possible QB was just wrong. SE has misdirected us before.
The KC aren't from the Malaz World, so there's no need to assume they use 'warrens' in the same context as the mages and gods of that world.
But also, there are various refs thru the books of other presences in the Impy Warren, some of whom left tail-trails in the ashes. So maybe the KC/KN have been active there for a while.
- Abyss, gives HUGE props to Vaiski for the quote without even the slightest flicker of the Vaiski-signal.

It's always been possible QB was just wrong. SE has misdirected us before.
The KC aren't from the Malaz World, so there's no need to assume they use 'warrens' in the same context as the mages and gods of that world.
But also, there are various refs thru the books of other presences in the Impy Warren, some of whom left tail-trails in the ashes. So maybe the KC/KN have been active there for a while.
- Abyss, gives HUGE props to Vaiski for the quote without even the slightest flicker of the Vaiski-signal.
THIS IS YOUR REMINDER THAT THERE IS A
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
#27 Guest_potsherds_*
Posted 02 August 2006 - 06:48 PM
I had always thought that the Imperial Warren was the KCCM warren. So, that quote is a derned inconvenience.
Do you think that SE has made a mistake? I would think the sky cities in TBH is rather strong evidence that the Imperial Warren is the KCCM warren, but that contradicts this quote...
And thank you Vaiski. Your quote ability is very impressive.
Do you think that SE has made a mistake? I would think the sky cities in TBH is rather strong evidence that the Imperial Warren is the KCCM warren, but that contradicts this quote...
And thank you Vaiski. Your quote ability is very impressive.
#28
Posted 02 August 2006 - 08:50 PM
I thought Kchain = Imperial, but now really am thinking they dont need warrens. The Kchain are quite alien, the matrons were the sole sour of magic, and they dominated the EGs, who are all about magic. Is there any evidence the Short tails even use magic? Also really curious about where the Kchain originally came from.... but there isnt much info on that.
#29
Posted 02 August 2006 - 08:56 PM
It's stated in an early book (I forget where) that KCCM magic was gravity-aspected, and in MT we see Kaschan sorcery in the Edur holy place (the Dark Bowl, something like that).
It's unconfirmed how much they used tech and how much they used magic.
Also - we know the Matrons used magic, they were kind of a conduit for the whole power of their brood. Larger population = more powerful Matron. So that was definitely magic. Pannion drew on the sorcerous power of his Matron, unless I am greatly mistaken.
It's unconfirmed how much they used tech and how much they used magic.
Also - we know the Matrons used magic, they were kind of a conduit for the whole power of their brood. Larger population = more powerful Matron. So that was definitely magic. Pannion drew on the sorcerous power of his Matron, unless I am greatly mistaken.
#30
Posted 02 August 2006 - 10:03 PM
Kaschan sorcery? Hmmm will have to add that to the list of things to pay special attention to on the next reread.
Gravity Aspected: More Hmmm.... in that they control gravity, hence they have a means to propel their flying keeps. I still find the keeps being kept in the air due to magic much more appealing than being ALL about science.
Gravity Aspected: More Hmmm.... in that they control gravity, hence they have a means to propel their flying keeps. I still find the keeps being kept in the air due to magic much more appealing than being ALL about science.
#31
Posted 02 August 2006 - 10:10 PM
I always thought that the kccm's sorcery was sound oriented? Altho i might have just seen that on the forum as a theory...
#32
Posted 02 August 2006 - 10:34 PM
No, when the Binadas and Trull are talking about Kaschan sorcery they do discuss sound, I'm fairly sure. But the gravity quote from earlier still stands also.
#33 Guest_potsherds_*
Posted 03 August 2006 - 04:23 AM
Dolorous Menhir said:
No, when the Binadas and Trull are talking about Kaschan sorcery they do discuss sound, I'm fairly sure. But the gravity quote from earlier still stands also.
??? Can you (or Vaiski, bless him) find this qoute about gravity? I am not familiar with it, and I recently reread the first three books. I was under the impression that everyone discussing this gravity aspect was treating it as theory because it was only implied that that was their magic's aspect. This is the first time, that I'm aware of, that anyone has treated this as fact.
#34
Posted 03 August 2006 - 09:20 AM
The quote:
"Kaschan sorcery is born of sounds our ears cannot hear, formed into words that loosen the bindings that hold all matter together, that hold it to the ground. Sounds that bend and stretch light, as a tidal inflow up a river is drawn apart at the moment of turning."
(MT TB, p.92)
"Kaschan sorcery is born of sounds our ears cannot hear, formed into words that loosen the bindings that hold all matter together, that hold it to the ground. Sounds that bend and stretch light, as a tidal inflow up a river is drawn apart at the moment of turning."
(MT TB, p.92)
#35 Guest_potsherds_*
Posted 03 August 2006 - 11:22 AM
vaiski said:
The quote:
"Kaschan sorcery is born of sounds our ears cannot hear, formed into words that loosen the bindings that hold all matter together, that hold it to the ground. Sounds that bend and stretch light, as a tidal inflow up a river is drawn apart at the moment of turning."
(MT TB, p.92)
"Kaschan sorcery is born of sounds our ears cannot hear, formed into words that loosen the bindings that hold all matter together, that hold it to the ground. Sounds that bend and stretch light, as a tidal inflow up a river is drawn apart at the moment of turning."
(MT TB, p.92)
Thanks Vaiski! :wave:
Ok, so this quote irks me, since 'the bindings that hold all matter together' would more accurately be the electromagnetic force. Everything else is certainly most likely to mean gravity though, so I'm guessing SE just isn't aware of the relative strengths of the 4 physical forces.
So I guess I'm convinced. And I think its derned strange to give a race the aspect of gravity. It just doesn't really fit, imo.
#36
Posted 03 August 2006 - 12:09 PM
vaiski said:
The quote:
"Kaschan sorcery is born of sounds our ears cannot hear, formed into words that loosen the bindings that hold all matter together, that hold it to the ground. Sounds that bend and stretch light, as a tidal inflow up a river is drawn apart at the moment of turning."
(MT TB, p.92)
"Kaschan sorcery is born of sounds our ears cannot hear, formed into words that loosen the bindings that hold all matter together, that hold it to the ground. Sounds that bend and stretch light, as a tidal inflow up a river is drawn apart at the moment of turning."
(MT TB, p.92)
Fear is not necessarily a reliable source on what is actually going on. His information is second-hand to begin with, and from the way K'Chain has become Kaschan (and K'rul is our source on K'Chain), I think it's very possible that the Edur's understanding is incomplete. Not that it is patently untrue... but rather just simplified.
As described, Kaschan "sorcery" could easily be created by technological or mechanical means. I still think the KC are something alien to everything else we know in Wu.
#37
Posted 03 August 2006 - 12:24 PM
KCCM sorcery being solely technology and/or mechanics somehow feels wrong.
Just remember the communiction devices in GotM used by WJ and Dujek, likely of KCCM origin, more or less just bones and copperwire. The description made me more think of a toy I played with as a child than of an advanced technological device ...
Just remember the communiction devices in GotM used by WJ and Dujek, likely of KCCM origin, more or less just bones and copperwire. The description made me more think of a toy I played with as a child than of an advanced technological device ...
#38
Posted 03 August 2006 - 01:05 PM
potsherds said:
Thanks Vaiski! :wave:
Ok, so this quote irks me, since 'the bindings that hold all matter together' would more accurately be the electromagnetic force. Everything else is certainly most likely to mean gravity though, so I'm guessing SE just isn't aware of the relative strengths of the 4 physical forces.
So I guess I'm convinced. And I think its derned strange to give a race the aspect of gravity. It just doesn't really fit, imo.
Ok, so this quote irks me, since 'the bindings that hold all matter together' would more accurately be the electromagnetic force. Everything else is certainly most likely to mean gravity though, so I'm guessing SE just isn't aware of the relative strengths of the 4 physical forces.
So I guess I'm convinced. And I think its derned strange to give a race the aspect of gravity. It just doesn't really fit, imo.
KCCM buily the Sky Keeps. It seems natural a race aspected to gravity are capable of counteracting it.
Can't provide gravity-aspect quote at moment, separated from books, sorry. Vaiski didn't provide it, which has me worried...
#39
Posted 03 August 2006 - 03:27 PM
Was just thinking - remember the ancient Gods that one of the beddict brothers (I can remember the name off-hand) saw etched into the Dolmen under the sea? Could they be old K'Chain Gods?
Just a thought!
Just a thought!
#40
Posted 03 August 2006 - 05:11 PM
Its was Brys Beddict. And were those Gods not only gods in some way aspected to sea or water?