Apsalar's Footprints
#21
Posted 26 July 2006 - 08:45 AM
This is getting a bit off-topic now, but I wonder what effect it has that there's supposed to be other DoD's out there.
Is this something that SE forgot that was hinted at or is Paran unknowingly missing important developments around the world? I don't think the decks refered to is the so called deck of the holds.
I would like to know the difference between the one we've heard used and other ones.
Is this something that SE forgot that was hinted at or is Paran unknowingly missing important developments around the world? I don't think the decks refered to is the so called deck of the holds.
I would like to know the difference between the one we've heard used and other ones.
#22
Posted 26 July 2006 - 01:43 PM
The DoD is probably radically diffrent in the more isolated cultures...assail...etc...
Look in MT at their tiles...which in a way was there DoD...
Depending on what gods/ascendants a culture accepts/worship/belive in I guess you would end up with diffrent DoD:s or equivalents...
Look in MT at their tiles...which in a way was there DoD...
Depending on what gods/ascendants a culture accepts/worship/belive in I guess you would end up with diffrent DoD:s or equivalents...
#24
Posted 26 July 2006 - 04:37 PM
The Holds became the Houses -some of them at least - so you can say that they both are and aren't the same thing. Lether's tiles were the Holds only because of the preserving effects of Gothos' ice. Without that they'd have turned/grown into the Houses.
Apsalar the Imass has to be pre-Ritual as the post-Ritual Imass can't Ascend (I'm not sure of the provenance of that, but I definitely recall reading it somewhere). Given how fond of archetypes SE is (Ascendency seems to include the individual personifying an archetype - at least in part) so perhaps the thing that the original Apsalar stole is fire...And that's why she's worshipped. Imass civilisation began with the theft of the thing that defines them. Tellann.
Footprints and veils are both about being unseen which is as valuable an attribute for a thief as it is for an assassin.
Apsalar the Imass has to be pre-Ritual as the post-Ritual Imass can't Ascend (I'm not sure of the provenance of that, but I definitely recall reading it somewhere). Given how fond of archetypes SE is (Ascendency seems to include the individual personifying an archetype - at least in part) so perhaps the thing that the original Apsalar stole is fire...And that's why she's worshipped. Imass civilisation began with the theft of the thing that defines them. Tellann.
Footprints and veils are both about being unseen which is as valuable an attribute for a thief as it is for an assassin.
If an opinion contrary to your own makes you angry, that is a sign that you are subconsciously aware of having no good reason for thinking as you do. If some one maintains that two and two are five, or that Iceland is on the equator, you feel pity rather than anger, unless you know so little of arithmetic or geography that his opinion shakes your own contrary conviction. … So whenever you find yourself getting angry about a difference of opinion, be on your guard; you will probably find, on examination, that your belief is going beyond what the evidence warrants. Bertrand Russell
#25
Posted 26 July 2006 - 05:02 PM
stone monkey said:
Apsalar the Imass has to be pre-Ritual as the post-Ritual Imass can't Ascend (I'm not sure of the provenance of that, but I definitely recall reading it somewhere). Given how fond of archetypes SE is (Ascendency seems to include the individual personifying an archetype - at least in part) so perhaps the thing that the original Apsalar stole is fire...And that's why she's worshipped. Imass civilisation began with the theft of the thing that defines them. Tellann.
Wow. I'd suggest putting that in the Crazy Theories, but it's really not that crazy...wish I'd thought of that.
#26
Posted 26 July 2006 - 05:26 PM
stone monkey said:
Apsalar the Imass has to be pre-Ritual as the post-Ritual Imass can't Ascend (I'm not sure of the provenance of that, but I definitely recall reading it somewhere). Given how fond of archetypes SE is (Ascendency seems to include the individual personifying an archetype - at least in part) so perhaps the thing that the original Apsalar stole is fire...And that's why she's worshipped. Imass civilisation began with the theft of the thing that defines them. Tellann.
Wow, that would be some revelation! That's an awesome theory!
#27
Posted 26 July 2006 - 05:41 PM
stone monkey said:
Apsalar the Imass has to be pre-Ritual as the post-Ritual Imass can't Ascend (I'm not sure of the provenance of that, but I definitely recall reading it somewhere). Given how fond of archetypes SE is (Ascendency seems to include the individual personifying an archetype - at least in part) so perhaps the thing that the original Apsalar stole is fire...And that's why she's worshipped. Imass civilisation began with the theft of the thing that defines them. Tellann.
I like that a lot...
They’re called T’lan Imass—’
Her breath caught. ‘The Beast Hold.’
He glanced at her. ‘What?’
‘The Bone Perch. Elder, Crone, Seer, Shaman, Hunter and Tracker. The Stealers of Fire. Stolen from the Eres’al.’
#28
Posted 26 July 2006 - 06:54 PM
stone monkey said:
The Holds became the Houses -some of them at least - so you can say that they both are and aren't the same thing. Lether's tiles were the Holds only because of the preserving effects of Gothos' ice. Without that they'd have turned/grown into the Houses.
Apsalar the Imass has to be pre-Ritual as the post-Ritual Imass can't Ascend (I'm not sure of the provenance of that, but I definitely recall reading it somewhere). Given how fond of archetypes SE is (Ascendency seems to include the individual personifying an archetype - at least in part) so perhaps the thing that the original Apsalar stole is fire...And that's why she's worshipped. Imass civilisation began with the theft of the thing that defines them. Tellann.
Footprints and veils are both about being unseen which is as valuable an attribute for a thief as it is for an assassin.
Apsalar the Imass has to be pre-Ritual as the post-Ritual Imass can't Ascend (I'm not sure of the provenance of that, but I definitely recall reading it somewhere). Given how fond of archetypes SE is (Ascendency seems to include the individual personifying an archetype - at least in part) so perhaps the thing that the original Apsalar stole is fire...And that's why she's worshipped. Imass civilisation began with the theft of the thing that defines them. Tellann.
Footprints and veils are both about being unseen which is as valuable an attribute for a thief as it is for an assassin.
Didn't it say somewhere that Olar ethil obtained fire (tellann??) after nagging one of the other dragons?
Edit: and didn't the whirlwind goddess ascend post ritual?
“Arm yourself, Watson, there is an evil hand afoot ahead"
#29
Posted 26 July 2006 - 07:46 PM
Good point re: Dryhja, but she was heavily damaged and fell out of the ritual, was stuck under a rock by the other Imass and proceeded to gather power from passing spirits. So really, she was already ascended (as are all post-ritual Imass) and proceeded to change her aspect over a few hundred millenia or so.
But I suppose this does leave it open for a post-ritual Imass to become aspected to something other than Tellan/dust. And from what we saw of Legana Breed and Onrack, it's not impossible for an undead Imass' personality to make them something other than the usual grim, mission-focused fighting machines many of them seem to be (see: Ibra).
- Abyss, aspect-backwards.
But I suppose this does leave it open for a post-ritual Imass to become aspected to something other than Tellan/dust. And from what we saw of Legana Breed and Onrack, it's not impossible for an undead Imass' personality to make them something other than the usual grim, mission-focused fighting machines many of them seem to be (see: Ibra).
- Abyss, aspect-backwards.
THIS IS YOUR REMINDER THAT THERE IS A
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
#30 Guest_Rhysel_*
Posted 26 July 2006 - 08:11 PM
I agree with you Abyss, with regards to Legana Breed, but the only T'lan Imass that I've found have a real personality are the two that were cut off from the ritual, that being Onos Toolan and Onrack the broken. Doesn't each of them even state that being cut off from the rest has allowed them to see things differently and express themselves in a different way. Its also important that within the ritual, they can all communicate to eachother without speech, and very few take the time to really establish relationships with individuals from other races (with the exception of the three listed above).
Rhysel
Rhysel
#31
Posted 26 July 2006 - 10:35 PM
Being clanless seems to be important, and Legana Breed is indeed one of the three clanless Imass we know. If we meet any more, they might have just as much personality as those three.
#32
Posted 07 August 2006 - 08:24 PM
also the apsalar imass isnt dead. She was seen around a century ago in Darujhistan
#33
Posted 08 August 2006 - 12:53 PM
Hetan said:
I'm not sure that Ganoes is needed to approve any changes within a house , apart from the sanctioning of a new house.. we've seen positions come and go and change. Master of the Deck appears to mean that he can move freely within it and call upon whomsoever he chooses or their power. Admittedly he's still learning, but he wasn't required to sanction Baudin, and the House of War has just appeared. Did he sanction that by his unknowing blessing of the BB?
Hasn't it been said somewhere that there are a bucketload of inactive cards that arn't represented in the deck any longer because noone have occupied them for too long, and that those cards are just sleeping. Maybe it's the same for some houses so maybe the House of War didn't need any blessning cause it had already existed wheras the House of Chains is fresh?
#34
Posted 08 August 2006 - 12:59 PM
It's only been confirmed that the Master has to sanction entire Houses. I really doubt he has anything to do with more rote tasks like the selection of a new Knight. I think the MotD only has to sanction the existence of new cards, not the people who occupy them - which is the concern of the heads of Houses only, and went on without interruption while there was no Master.
#35
Posted 08 August 2006 - 06:23 PM
the house of war should have already existed in the form of feners warren as he was worshipped as the god of war.. that would make the house existant but inactive
#36
Posted 08 August 2006 - 07:34 PM
When Ganoes was with Hedge didnt he say to him about making a card for all of them, the soldiers I mean?
#37
Posted 08 August 2006 - 08:48 PM
fan_83 said:
the house of war should have already existed in the form of feners warren as he was worshipped as the god of war.. that would make the house existant but inactive
And that is triggering a thought for me...
Can War be considered an Elemental Force? If so, which Elder God is connected to it? The CG himself maybe, since he was called down to take care of a Warrior King (Kallor)?
Having a (modern) House of War to counter the CG, a House extremely more beefed up with Gods and Ascendants than other Houses, and all War-aspected, may not be as overdone as I thought it to be the case when I read TBH the last 2 times then... Maybe even the Felisin Fatter switch to passive indulgence could be explained as weakening the CG here, since she was supposed to be Shaik part 3. I thought that a weird development the 2 times I read it...
Doing a TBH reread again now, after a full reread barring MT. I'll keep an eye on this possibility.
Unless somebody else already mentioned it in the crazy theories, of course...
#38
Posted 08 August 2006 - 09:12 PM
BridgeBurner said:
Can War be considered an Elemental Force? If so, which Elder God is connected to it? The CG himself maybe, since he was called down to take care of a Warrior King (Kallor)?
Counterpoint: my understanding is that the Crippled God was not the target of the mage circle which caused his Fall. Rather, they set up a "trap" of some kind, and the CG was the one who happened to be attracted into it and forced into the Malaz world. So you can't argue the nature of the CG by considerations of what he was called down to fight against (Kallor) because he was not specifically called down. This could be incorrect, it is my interpretation of what we have described to us about the Fall.
Plus I don't buy "war" as an elemental force, any more than "peace". Love, life, death, these are different from "war" in a way I'm not really up to describing right now.
And I agree with you, I think the House of War is an attempt to counter the new presence of HHChains in the Deck - all elements in the Deck (apart from Unaligned) seem to have a counterbalance of some kind...and I'm not seeing a High House Freedom on the horizon. Notably, HHWar is made up of forces marshalled by K'rul and the other Elder Gods, who are very much in opposition to the CG.
#39
Posted 09 August 2006 - 11:49 AM
i think the house of war has been summoned like the MotD. It has been brought into being becuase it was needed. JUst a thought
#40
Posted 09 August 2006 - 01:13 PM
"Summoned like the MotD"?
What does that mean - where was Paran "summoned" from?
What does that mean - where was Paran "summoned" from?

Help

















