Malazan Empire: Tlan Imass boncasters, Vampiric power ability - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 4 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Tlan Imass boncasters, Vampiric power ability

#21 User is offline   tiam 

  • Ascendant
  • Group: Mott Irregulars
  • Posts: 3,953
  • Joined: 26-January 06

Posted 16 May 2006 - 05:43 AM

eyh but bonecasters are also leaders aswell.

Personally i think bonecasters are incredibly powerful. if raest did have an imass BC then apparently he could kill most of the gods. Also theres a quote in GOTM i think about the battle for kartool in relation to Pale. it calimed the only time imass sorceries ad been uneleashed was at the battle for kartool island and it made moons spawn attack look like aa 'childs cantrip'. just a thought in relation to the power
0

#22 User is offline   Whelp 

  • Fist
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 292
  • Joined: 13-March 06

Posted 16 May 2006 - 06:16 AM

Hmm, might there be a parallel between bonecasters and KCCM Matrons? I mean, a Matron has all sorcery from her brood, whereas the Imass bonecasters seem to have all sorcery from their clans...
0

#23 User is offline   tjc52 

  • Sergeant
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 77
  • Joined: 09-March 06

Posted 16 May 2006 - 07:21 AM

There certainly seems to be the indication in Onracks POV in HoC that the Bonecasters are chosen, one per clan, rather than requiring any special ability, and also that bonecasters can be stripped of their power - I'm fairly sure that at one point Onrack says that he was once his clans bonecaster, before the power was granted to someone else more interested in it. This does imply a kind of KCCM Matronish setup, with the powers of a whole clan being channeled into their bonecaster.
0

#24 Guest_Daemon_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 16 May 2006 - 08:01 AM

I like the comparison with the KCCM matrons somehow. Would explain the fear of Tool that Raest could control a bonecaster. See the similarity to Pannion controlling a KCCM matron?
0

#25 User is offline   Abyss 

  • abyssus abyssum invocat
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 22,658
  • Joined: 22-May 03
  • Location:The call is coming from inside the house!!!!
  • Interests:Interesting.

Posted 16 May 2006 - 05:56 PM

Pretty sure Onrack was ref'd as being a retired bonecaster at some point in HoC. He was still able to do a small ritual to bind himself to Trull.

Bonecasters were around before the Ritual. They seem to be a link between the various members of their clan and the Tellann warren.

We saw a bonecaster go dusty and kill the insane mage in DG.

A Bonecaster was involved in creating Silverfox. I assumed, perhaps wrongly, that the flyfeste in Tb before Heboric and co were ambushed was a result of the Unbound's Bonecaster.

- Abyss, fendercaster.
THIS IS YOUR REMINDER THAT THERE IS A
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
0

#26 User is offline   tiam 

  • Ascendant
  • Group: Mott Irregulars
  • Posts: 3,953
  • Joined: 26-January 06

Posted 16 May 2006 - 06:10 PM

abyss- i took it as hoods message the whole fly thing

tjc52- Onracks resignation was more of an acknowedgement of someone else who was more suitable and who had more power or was more spiritual. any way somone superior in the arts of tellan.
0

#27 User is offline   Abyss 

  • abyssus abyssum invocat
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 22,658
  • Joined: 22-May 03
  • Location:The call is coming from inside the house!!!!
  • Interests:Interesting.

Posted 16 May 2006 - 06:31 PM

Hood's message in DG was a premonition, but SOMETHING was going on with those flies at the ambush and i doubt Hood had anything to do with it.

- Abyss, bzzzzzzzzz
THIS IS YOUR REMINDER THAT THERE IS A
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
0

#28 User is offline   Whelp 

  • Fist
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 292
  • Joined: 13-March 06

Posted 17 May 2006 - 06:59 AM

Interesting points on Onrack:
- MoI mentions him standing among his slain clan during the destruction of the First Empire (during Itkovian embracing the T'lan Imass memories)
- Bonecasters do not wield weapons, he does

Imho, he was not a Bonecaster as such, but he definitely has/had magical talents, since that painting of his held Kilava pretty young for the last 300 millenia.
0

#29 Guest_Danyah_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 17 May 2006 - 09:23 AM

And bonecasters do not wield weaopens, they are soletaken. No need to wield a spear if you can turn yourself into a lion or a tiger or a bear. Even, what would one do with a spear if your soletaken form is not a monkey?
0

#30 Guest_Swordbearer_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 17 May 2006 - 01:30 PM

An Idea pertaining to Tools fear about a Boncaster being controled by Raest or another Jaghut Tyrant, someone brought up the KCCM.
Not quite the same thing, KCCM children of the Matron no free will period. excluding Nah ruhk.
Its like this IMO. The T'lan ritual linked each individual warrior to their immediate family group Bonecaster then each fam Bonecaster is linked to all the other fam group Bonecasters they form the collective army IE: Logros assuming each army has a senior bonecaster that is linked to all the other armys {Cannot remember how many other armys are still viable one almost totaly wiped out on Assail}. So a fully matured Tyrant secure in his ability to dominate would through one Bonecaster be able to control all perhaps even Olar Ethil asuming she's the ultimate combined army Bonecaster Thats why Tool was chosen His sister wiped out all but him in his fam so he must have linked with some other bonecaster for the T'lan ritual then after th BCs failure to continue severed him from the rest of the Imass army he was chosen to assist Lorn. No link to Logros no chance to control them.
Assuming I'm right.Scary Huh
0

#31 User is offline   fan_83 

  • First Sword
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 680
  • Joined: 05-January 03

Posted 17 May 2006 - 04:37 PM

thats the basis of the choice as well as the imass, legana.. they seem to be a link that monitors the wellbeing of each imass to his individual family, clan, and that legana was chosen for the painful sacrifice as to not cause the rest of the clan, pain when one of hteir own is cast into the rent
0

#32 User is offline   tiam 

  • Ascendant
  • Group: Mott Irregulars
  • Posts: 3,953
  • Joined: 26-January 06

Posted 17 May 2006 - 06:07 PM

and also it may weaken the ritual. or some sort of revenge thing. we know that the imass can hold a grudge so maybe if for example tools clan was still alive then if he was taken by raest it would be up to his clan to get him back or atleast avenge him
0

#33 User is offline   Cedeos 

  • Sergeant
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 61
  • Joined: 15-May 06

Posted 17 May 2006 - 07:37 PM

tiam said:

tjc52- Onracks resignation was more of an acknowedgement of someone else who was more suitable and who had more power or was more spiritual. any way somone superior in the arts of tellan.


Onrack was in fact a bonecaster before the Tellan ritual. Found the passage in HoC. He regains his memories (because of being severed from the ritual):

"... Onrack who was flesh and blood. But he had stepped aside. No longer bonecaster for his clan - Absin Tholai was far superior ..."
0

#34 User is offline   Abyss 

  • abyssus abyssum invocat
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 22,658
  • Joined: 22-May 03
  • Location:The call is coming from inside the house!!!!
  • Interests:Interesting.

Posted 17 May 2006 - 07:56 PM

Onrack's picture didn't keep Kilava young. Her being a soletaken bonecaster did.

- Abyss, figures that would be a hell of a kodak moment.
THIS IS YOUR REMINDER THAT THERE IS A
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
0

#35 User is offline   Illuyankas 

  • Retro Classic
  • Group: The Hateocracy of Truth
  • Posts: 7,254
  • Joined: 28-September 04
  • Will cluck you up

Posted 17 May 2006 - 08:11 PM

I have to disagree with you there, Abyss. Why else would there be such rules prohibiting the painting?
Hello, soldiers, look at your mage, now back to me, now back at your mage, now back to me. Sadly, he isn’t me, but if he stopped being an unascended mortal and switched to Sole Spice, he could smell like he’s me. Look down, back up, where are you? You’re in a warren with the High Mage your cadre mage could smell like. What’s in your hand, back at me. I have it, it’s an acorn with two gates to that realm you love. Look again, the acorn is now otataral. Anything is possible when your mage smells like Sole Spice and not a Bole brother. I’m on a quorl.
0

#36

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 17 May 2006 - 08:12 PM

@ Abyss
hmmm... yep I agree with that.. on the bonecaster bit...
I believe it was his painting of her that made her immortal... a bonecaster (he had the talent) re-creating a bonecaster... so to speak ;)
0

#37 User is offline   PannionDude 

  • Lieutenant
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 118
  • Joined: 24-April 06

Posted 17 May 2006 - 08:42 PM

I believe that his painting influenced her to reject the ritual. I think slaughtering her whole clan has to be laid on her own dime though. That was just cold.
0

#38 User is offline   fan_83 

  • First Sword
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 680
  • Joined: 05-January 03

Posted 17 May 2006 - 11:09 PM

tiam: its not a revenge thing. look at hte statement that reast can enslave a bonecaster and become all pwoerful, that implies a link to control the clans..

also onrack's painting i believe immortalises her, i believe ascended would be the term used, most appropriately as she is boosted above her mortal kin..

also i don;t htink the painting influence her in anyway.. she doesn;t want to be turned undead. so she slaughtered her whole clan as not to be dragged into teh ritual, only tool as first sword survived and kilava then sever the ties..
0

#39 User is offline   tiam 

  • Ascendant
  • Group: Mott Irregulars
  • Posts: 3,953
  • Joined: 26-January 06

Posted 18 May 2006 - 11:23 AM

Shadowlord said:

Onrack was in fact a bonecaster before the Tellan ritual. Found the passage in HoC. He regains his memories (because of being severed from the ritual):

"... Onrack who was flesh and blood. But he had stepped aside. No longer bonecaster for his clan - Absin Tholai was far superior ..."


yeh the quote says thatabsin tholai was far superior in the mystic arts of tellan or something like that and also had the ambition needed to be a bonecaster. that was the quote i referred to. he acknowledges someone was btter and stood down.


fan 83- i agree that if for example pran chole was taken then maybe raest could through him enslave the rest of the kron imass ( i think it was Kron) but i thought it had more to do with the power of the bonecaster not just the enslavement.
0

#40 User is offline   Dolorous Menhir 

  • God
  • Group: Wiki Contributor
  • Posts: 4,550
  • Joined: 31-January 06

Posted 18 May 2006 - 11:37 AM

fan_83 said:

tiam: its not a revenge thing. look at hte statement that reast can enslave a bonecaster and become all pwoerful, that implies a link to control the clans..


No it doesn't, it implies that individual bonecasters are really powerful. If control over one bonecaster meant control over all, then I think that's what Tool would have said, no?
0

Share this topic:


  • 4 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users