Tiam-the blood that everyone drinks.
#61
Posted 09 May 2006 - 07:53 PM
That all seems reasonable IH, except that of the potential combinations for Phaed's parentage
Rake-Envy
Golit-Envy
the only confirmed Soletaken Eleint is Rake. It's quite possible that Envy, Golit or both are not draconic, especially when you consider that Golit was also on Drift Avalii during the Edur assault, and didn't do squat.
Not convinced that the series has such a well-defined genetic base anyway, maybe you are reading too much complexity into it.
Rake-Envy
Golit-Envy
the only confirmed Soletaken Eleint is Rake. It's quite possible that Envy, Golit or both are not draconic, especially when you consider that Golit was also on Drift Avalii during the Edur assault, and didn't do squat.
Not convinced that the series has such a well-defined genetic base anyway, maybe you are reading too much complexity into it.
#62
Posted 09 May 2006 - 08:00 PM
Quote
It's quite possible that Envy, Golit or both are not draconic,
BUT- if either if them aren't draconic the theory that both parents are draconic = draconic offspring is blown out of the water, as both would have draconic parents by that theory.
Quote
especially when you consider that Golit was also on Drift Avalii during the Edur assault, and didn't do squat.
Is that confirmed? do you really think the first son of the son was on the island and this wasn't remarked upon by SE? plus all the andii on the island are referred to as grandkids, the parents having gone off adventuring.
I had the impression that Golit had come in from elsewhere after the edur attack
Quote
Not convinced that the series has such a well-defined genetic base anyway, maybe you are reading too much complexity into it.
very likely! but i'm having fun!
#63
Posted 09 May 2006 - 08:03 PM
This isn't a determinant of course but isn't Spite described as having draconean skin (her hands having scales etc.)? From what we can tell, Envy has no such visible markings or Toc would have noticed (and we al know he was paying attention!).
"We greet you Jaghut."
#64
Posted 09 May 2006 - 08:12 PM
So where did Golit come from then? I see what you're saying, the Andii on Drift Avalii were described as Rake's grandchildren in HoC.
Since that presumably makes them Golit's kids, maybe he came by to see them once they'd escaped? There's just something weak about him though, I wouldn't count on him being a Soletaken.
Since that presumably makes them Golit's kids, maybe he came by to see them once they'd escaped? There's just something weak about him though, I wouldn't count on him being a Soletaken.
#65 Guest_Danyah_*
Posted 09 May 2006 - 08:28 PM
Why would Spite be one and her sister not, sharing the same parents.
As for imperial historian, genetics don't work here. Being draconean would be a fenotypical trait, since it was acquired by doing the mystery thing to Tiam, not by birth. So either you pass the poison to the kids like AIDS, or you don't.
I vote draconianism as a STD.
As for imperial historian, genetics don't work here. Being draconean would be a fenotypical trait, since it was acquired by doing the mystery thing to Tiam, not by birth. So either you pass the poison to the kids like AIDS, or you don't.
I vote draconianism as a STD.
#66
Posted 09 May 2006 - 09:04 PM
Quote
As for imperial historian, genetics don't work here. Being draconean would be a fenotypical trait, since it was acquired by doing the mystery thing to Tiam, not by birth. So either you pass the poison to the kids like AIDS, or you don't.
Thats a possibility true, but being soletaken could feasibly change the genetics of a person, we don't know enough about how it works... plus if its a phenotypical trait why would spite be more draconic with the scales and stuff than envy? while genetically its plausible she could have inhrited more of the draconean genetics...
#67
Posted 09 May 2006 - 09:30 PM
STDs are transmitted from mother to child through breast milk right? So maybe Spite was put on the teat, but Envy wasn't.
Vox
Vox
Don't look now, but I think there's something weird attached to the bottom of my posts.
#68
Posted 09 May 2006 - 09:39 PM
I think we're all getting a little off track here.. why should any of the 'normal' genetics rule apply in a fantasy novel?
If SE decides that one is draconic and the other isn't... I can play with that
If SE decides that one is draconic and the other isn't... I can play with that

#69 Guest_Danyah_*
Posted 09 May 2006 - 10:41 PM
Well we can't. And this has become an issue for Golit, Phaed, Envy, Spite,...
@Vox, please tell me this is STD transferring is a joke.
I just wanted to point out that which is in the blood can be passed through the blood. Somebody mentioned Andarist as non-draconean as proof that it wasn't passed on to all children...his two brothers did the Tiam, while he abstained, that's why he's not an eleint soletaken.
Sheltata had two draconean parents: Tiam and Scabby. Same for Dapple and Menandore (Osserc and Tiam).(Maybe they became dragons by sleeping with her?). Obviously they are draconean. Same for Rud Elalle, as his mother was Menandore, and his father had wyval's blood in his veins. Envy and Spite are both daughters to Lore and Draconus, both Draconean, why would Envy then not be draconean. Because she doesn't veer? Veering is so unladylike, it doesn't fit her. As for the youths, they weren't allowed to fight. Dragons aren't immortal. Rake had some troubles with Anasters chaoswitches too, why would two young Andii soletaken be able to destroy some Edur warlocks?
@Vox, please tell me this is STD transferring is a joke.
I just wanted to point out that which is in the blood can be passed through the blood. Somebody mentioned Andarist as non-draconean as proof that it wasn't passed on to all children...his two brothers did the Tiam, while he abstained, that's why he's not an eleint soletaken.
Sheltata had two draconean parents: Tiam and Scabby. Same for Dapple and Menandore (Osserc and Tiam).(Maybe they became dragons by sleeping with her?). Obviously they are draconean. Same for Rud Elalle, as his mother was Menandore, and his father had wyval's blood in his veins. Envy and Spite are both daughters to Lore and Draconus, both Draconean, why would Envy then not be draconean. Because she doesn't veer? Veering is so unladylike, it doesn't fit her. As for the youths, they weren't allowed to fight. Dragons aren't immortal. Rake had some troubles with Anasters chaoswitches too, why would two young Andii soletaken be able to destroy some Edur warlocks?
#70
Posted 09 May 2006 - 11:08 PM
Just had an idea - we know that the Tiste sisters are the children of Tiam and Soletaken Eleint...but do we know that Osserc and Scabby had already drank the blood of Tiam when they sired their children?
Perhaps they (Osric, Scabby) became draconic after the births - maybe it was even the births that allowed them the chance to drink from Tiam (I know, seriously unpleasant imagery, sorry). If so, then we can't consider the offspring to have two draconic parents.
Anyway, being draconic is an acquired characteristic, and in the real world would not be transmitted to children. In the same way that a rat with its tail cut off would still produce children with tails...what I'm trying to say is, Rake is more draconic than he is Andii - but wouldn't he still father Andii children rather than dragons?
Andarist - he renounced his draconean blood as a result of the undescribed tragedy. So he was draconic, and must have drunk from Tiam at some point. He didn't abstain, he gave it up later.
Did the three brothers - Rake, Ruin, Andarist - all become draconic at the same time?
Perhaps they (Osric, Scabby) became draconic after the births - maybe it was even the births that allowed them the chance to drink from Tiam (I know, seriously unpleasant imagery, sorry). If so, then we can't consider the offspring to have two draconic parents.
Anyway, being draconic is an acquired characteristic, and in the real world would not be transmitted to children. In the same way that a rat with its tail cut off would still produce children with tails...what I'm trying to say is, Rake is more draconic than he is Andii - but wouldn't he still father Andii children rather than dragons?
Andarist - he renounced his draconean blood as a result of the undescribed tragedy. So he was draconic, and must have drunk from Tiam at some point. He didn't abstain, he gave it up later.
Did the three brothers - Rake, Ruin, Andarist - all become draconic at the same time?
#71
Posted 10 May 2006 - 05:56 AM
Good question, I think. I don't know, but from MT i had the faint recollection that Rake was the first, and Ruin followed suit. I always imagined that Rake killed the beast and then Ruin sneakes to the corpse and gets his drinkin' for free =D
And there was something in what Alrahda Ahn (wo however he is called, the Andii/Edur halfblood friend of Trull, the spy, you-know-who
) said about the Bluerose legends about the three. Andarist was leaving Mother D last I think, but I don't remember the paragraph exactly and don't have BH near by. (I never have when I need it - murphys law applies everywhere
)
And there was something in what Alrahda Ahn (wo however he is called, the Andii/Edur halfblood friend of Trull, the spy, you-know-who


#72
Posted 10 May 2006 - 10:57 AM
Danyah said:
@Vox, please tell me this is STD transferring is a joke.
Well, I was just following the route of the conversation...but yeah, it was in jest. (I think that was what you wanted to hear, wasn't it?)
Vox
Don't look now, but I think there's something weird attached to the bottom of my posts.
#73
Posted 10 May 2006 - 12:47 PM
Dinivan said:
Good question, I think. I don't know, but from MT i had the faint recollection that Rake was the first, and Ruin followed suit. I always imagined that Rake killed the beast and then Ruin sneakes to the corpse and gets his drinkin' for free =D
And there was something in what Alrahda Ahn (wo however he is called, the Andii/Edur halfblood friend of Trull, the spy, you-know-who
) said about the Bluerose legends about the three. Andarist was leaving Mother D last I think, but I don't remember the paragraph exactly and don't have BH near by. (I never have when I need it - murphys law applies everywhere
)
And there was something in what Alrahda Ahn (wo however he is called, the Andii/Edur halfblood friend of Trull, the spy, you-know-who


Andarist left MD first, because of Scabby's machinations, then Rake left after arguing with MD about Andarist, then Ruin allied with Shadow and got interned in the Azath. Basically.
Hello, soldiers, look at your mage, now back to me, now back at your mage, now back to me. Sadly, he isn’t me, but if he stopped being an unascended mortal and switched to Sole Spice, he could smell like he’s me. Look down, back up, where are you? You’re in a warren with the High Mage your cadre mage could smell like. What’s in your hand, back at me. I have it, it’s an acorn with two gates to that realm you love. Look again, the acorn is now otataral. Anything is possible when your mage smells like Sole Spice and not a Bole brother. I’m on a quorl.
#74
Posted 10 May 2006 - 01:58 PM
On the Envy topic, i tend to agree that MoI certainly suggests she's not draconic, but it's hardly certain. Anything from the CG's poisoning of the warren's to keeping her servants handy could have affected her conduct. Don't forget, she was acting at Krul's request, and i think it was essential that she reach Pale with Baaljaag, at a minimum, with her. Tool and Mok may have been needed too, for all we know, for events to unfold the way Krul wanted them to (ie: Tool alive but out of the ritual, Mok still in thrall to Envy, Toc dead but alive and Togg/Fancypants reunited....).
- Abyss, loves a good master plan.
- Abyss, loves a good master plan.
THIS IS YOUR REMINDER THAT THERE IS A
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
#75 Guest_Danyah_*
Posted 10 May 2006 - 02:18 PM
Yhink most are reluctant to veer because veering brings madness.
#76
Posted 10 May 2006 - 02:36 PM
I thought that was just 'normal' shapeshifters, not draconean ones.
- Abyss, likes draconean measures.
- Abyss, likes draconean measures.
THIS IS YOUR REMINDER THAT THERE IS A
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
#77
Posted 10 May 2006 - 02:47 PM
I think the madness comes with spending too much time in your Soletaken form, as Trake did. Not the actual act of veering itself, but the state of being "veered".
#78 Guest_Danyah_*
Posted 10 May 2006 - 02:50 PM
Well that's what I meant. We haven't seen either of in Draconean form long. Except maybe Olar Ethil, but he's undead so...
#80
Posted 10 May 2006 - 03:27 PM
All the draconean Soletaken we've seen have been extraordinary individuals, Osserc, Rake, etc. I think they would have the will and force of personality to remain themselves even if they stay were in draconic form for long periods of time.
Presumably Trake, as an unascended human, lacked that strength of character and fell into a bestial existence.
And Olar Ethil is female.
Presumably Trake, as an unascended human, lacked that strength of character and fell into a bestial existence.
And Olar Ethil is female.