Abyss, on 15 February 2018 - 04:14 AM, said:
Whisperzzzzzzz, on 15 February 2018 - 03:30 AM, said:
But there are some series that start out bad or have a decrease in quality, but then pull together for an awesome ending. How do you accommodate that?
It's all relative.
Also subjective.
Also, alcohol.
Maark Abbott, on 15 February 2018 - 08:36 AM, said:
And yet so many push forward with Stormlight... *eyes emoji*
Point.
Made.
...look at the notion of a series that 'starts out bad'... two come to mind... Butcher's ALERA and Barclay's RAVEN.
I picked up both of these based on pos reviews and comments elseforum, and can acknowledge that both start out 'bad'.
Thankfully not so bad that i tossed the books and didn't keep reading... there was enough there to hold my thinkymeatz attention through a weak first book.
So while i consider the first books 'bad', i really enjoyed both of those series. Subjectively, to me, bad wasn't bad enough to bail.
Contrast with Brett's DEMON CYCLE. I read the first book. It was 'bad'. Not bad enough to make me stop reading at any point, but i skimmed a chunk, and based on neg reviews and comments elseforum, never bothered with book 2 and likely won't. Bad was bad enough for me not to want to spend time on that series when there were others i wanted to read more.
KINGKILLER too... i skimmed massive amounts of WIND and have never touched anything in the series since, even when some forumites i trust love them. Also, dragoncow.
Bad in the middle is harder to deal with, especially when a series starts strong... WoT and SIF come to mind. All i can say is that the good is good enough to hold my attention, tho with WoT i stopped buying the books upon release and waited for clearance sales for much of the series before Sanderson took over.