Malazan Empire: Reading at t'moment? - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 1486 Pages +
  • « First
  • 679
  • 680
  • 681
  • 682
  • 683
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Reading at t'moment?

#13601 User is offline   Binder of Demons 

  • Lord of Light
  • View gallery
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 1,617
  • Joined: 02-March 07
  • Location:Ireland
  • - Thread Killer -

Posted 26 July 2014 - 05:31 PM

Reading RIVERS OF LONDON by Ben Aaronovitch and so far I'm enjoying it a lot. Plenty of mysteries thus far, so I can't wait to see how it plays out.

My only gripe is that Isaac Newton is being used a name/historical figure that is held in high esteem, to tie together science and magic in Britain from a few centuries back. And my problem with that is that Newton was a monumental douchebag, and I don't like seeing him get any props at all.

Who knows, maybe in the book he'll also turn out to have been a dick, who caused all manner of problems for lots of people he didn't like.

It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt - Mark Twain

Never argue with an idiot!
They'll drag you down to their level, and then beat you with experience!
- Anonymous
0

#13602 User is offline   Abyss 

  • abyssus abyssum invocat
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 21,997
  • Joined: 22-May 03
  • Location:The call is coming from inside the house!!!!
  • Interests:Interesting.

Posted 26 July 2014 - 11:06 PM

ASSAIL!

....almost.
THIS IS YOUR REMINDER THAT THERE IS A
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
0

#13603 User is offline   Coco with marshmallows 

  • DIIIIIIIIIIVVVEEEEE
  • Group: LHTEC
  • Posts: 2,115
  • Joined: 26-October 05

Posted 26 July 2014 - 11:36 PM

View PostBinder of Demons, on 26 July 2014 - 05:31 PM, said:

My only gripe is that Isaac Newton is being used a name/historical figure that is held in high esteem, to tie together science and magic in Britain from a few centuries back. And my problem with that is that Newton was a monumental douchebag, and I don't like seeing him get any props at all.

Who knows, maybe in the book he'll also turn out to have been a dick, who caused all manner of problems for lots of people he didn't like.


Because monumental douchebags can't be brilliant?
meh. Link was dead :(
0

#13604 User is offline   QuickTidal 

  • Lord of the Waters
  • Group: Team Quick Ben
  • Posts: 21,376
  • Joined: 05-November 05
  • Location:At Sea?
  • Interests:DoubleStamping. Movies. Reading.

Posted 27 July 2014 - 02:15 AM

Most brilliant people ARE monumental douchebags.
"When the last tree has fallen, and the rivers are poisoned, you cannot eat money, oh no." ~Aurora

"Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone." ~Ursula Vernon
0

#13605 User is offline   worry 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 14,695
  • Joined: 24-February 10
  • Location:the buried west

Posted 27 July 2014 - 03:09 AM

How dare you!
They came with white hands and left with red hands.
0

#13606 User is offline   amphibian 

  • Ribbit
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 8,003
  • Joined: 28-September 06
  • Location:Upstate NY
  • Interests:Hopping around

Posted 27 July 2014 - 04:23 AM

Don't pay attention to the plebes, unworthywort, we have to get back to our scheduled shushing of those in the first thirty rows of the One Direction concert.
I survived the Permian and all I got was this t-shirt.
0

#13607 User is offline   Binder of Demons 

  • Lord of Light
  • View gallery
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 1,617
  • Joined: 02-March 07
  • Location:Ireland
  • - Thread Killer -

Posted 27 July 2014 - 08:06 PM

View PostCocoreturns, on 26 July 2014 - 11:36 PM, said:

View PostBinder of Demons, on 26 July 2014 - 05:31 PM, said:

My only gripe is that Isaac Newton is being used a name/historical figure that is held in high esteem, to tie together science and magic in Britain from a few centuries back. And my problem with that is that Newton was a monumental douchebag, and I don't like seeing him get any props at all.

Who knows, maybe in the book he'll also turn out to have been a dick, who caused all manner of problems for lots of people he didn't like.


Because monumental douchebags can't be brilliant?


Nah, it's just I don't like seeing douchebags getting any more credit than they deserve, especially in a fictional context (which i am reading for enjoyment, and he's spoiling that enjoyment).

It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt - Mark Twain

Never argue with an idiot!
They'll drag you down to their level, and then beat you with experience!
- Anonymous
0

#13608 User is offline   Binder of Demons 

  • Lord of Light
  • View gallery
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 1,617
  • Joined: 02-March 07
  • Location:Ireland
  • - Thread Killer -

Posted 27 July 2014 - 08:08 PM

View PostQuickTidal, on 27 July 2014 - 02:15 AM, said:

Most brilliant people ARE monumental douchebags.


I wouldn't go so far as to say MOST brilliant people are douchebags. But, sadly it can be a high proportion.

It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt - Mark Twain

Never argue with an idiot!
They'll drag you down to their level, and then beat you with experience!
- Anonymous
0

#13609 User is offline   D'iversify 

  • First Sword
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 647
  • Joined: 07-October 10

Posted 28 July 2014 - 10:37 AM

I think it's fair to say that many brilliant people WHO GET THE CREDIT are often douchebags, or at the very least skilled politicians and showmen, and that brilliant people who lack these attributes can often either be beaten to the scoop in terms of publicity, even if in actual fact there first, or else fail to package their findings in an easily digestible and sensationalist packaging. Edison, for example, whilst I'm not qualified to judge the extent of his douchebaggery, certainly was a skilled politician who exploited the patent system to ensure he got primary credit in the case of many inventions either first developed by others or developed by his research team. This isn't to say that he didn't make many genuine inventions and innovations, but he was advantaged by his knowledge of how to package and present his creations to get ahead in the market.
I am the Onyx Wizards
1

#13610 User is offline   Ukjent 

  • First Sword
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 588
  • Joined: 29-May 12
  • Location:North, sweet north.

Posted 28 July 2014 - 12:00 PM

Done with Soldier's Live by Glen Cook. Feel a bit empty inside now and I think the next book have to be something lighter.
1

#13611 User is offline   Serenity 

  • Saki!!!!!
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 1,710
  • Joined: 23-June 09
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 28 July 2014 - 01:48 PM

Finished my third read through Gardens of the Moon. Think I love that book more each time I read it - and I really loved it the first time.

Now I'm reading Patrick Lee's Runner.
0

#13612 User is offline   Binder of Demons 

  • Lord of Light
  • View gallery
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 1,617
  • Joined: 02-March 07
  • Location:Ireland
  • - Thread Killer -

Posted 28 July 2014 - 06:05 PM

Just finished MOON OVER SOHO by Ben Aaronovitch, second book of his Peter Grant series.

Thoroughly enjoyable urban fantasy, similar in some ways to Butcher's "Dresden", or Jacka's "Alex Verus" series. Though much more low key in terms of the magic output than either of those 2 series. Which is a welcome change in some ways, as you don't always have to have universe imploding consequences in every book. I like Aaronovitch's writing style too, which doesn't seem too forced in the humour department (unlike say, Kevin Hearne's Iron Druid series), and occasionally has me laughing at detective Grant's reactions. The Grant character did seem a bit slower on the uptake in the second book, but I'll ignore that until I see how the 3rd and 4th books play out.

I'm annoyed by the fact that my local bookstores don't seem to have books 3 and 4 in stock at the moment, when they were definitely in last week. How typical is that. Always there before i had read the first one, and now I'll have to wait a bit before they're in again.

It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt - Mark Twain

Never argue with an idiot!
They'll drag you down to their level, and then beat you with experience!
- Anonymous
0

#13613 User is offline   Abyss 

  • abyssus abyssum invocat
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 21,997
  • Joined: 22-May 03
  • Location:The call is coming from inside the house!!!!
  • Interests:Interesting.

Posted 28 July 2014 - 07:06 PM

View PostBinder of Demons, on 28 July 2014 - 06:05 PM, said:

Just finished MOON OVER SOHO by Ben Aaronovitch, second book of his Peter Grant series.

Thoroughly enjoyable urban fantasy, similar in some ways to Butcher's "Dresden", or Jacka's "Alex Verus" series. Though much more low key in terms of the magic output than either of those 2 series. Which is a welcome change in some ways, as you don't always have to have universe imploding consequences in every book. I like Aaronovitch's writing style too, which doesn't seem too forced in the humour department (unlike say, Kevin Hearne's Iron Druid series), and occasionally has me laughing at detective Grant's reactions. The Grant character did seem a bit slower on the uptake in the second book, but I'll ignore that until I see how the 3rd and 4th books play out.

I'm annoyed by the fact that my local bookstores don't seem to have books 3 and 4 in stock at the moment, when they were definitely in last week. How typical is that. Always there before i had read the first one, and now I'll have to wait a bit before they're in again.


I really enjoy this series. Bk 3 was a bit less of a win than the others, but 4 was right back to form and great fun. Aaronovich does a great job with Grant as narrator... his combo of rookie cop, irreverence, 'this is the coolest thing ever' and sheer awe really works nicely. He's like Dresden might be if he hadn't been abused, hunted and generally mistreated as a kid.


Amazon has these available and dl'able, btw.
THIS IS YOUR REMINDER THAT THERE IS A
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
0

#13614 User is offline   Abyss 

  • abyssus abyssum invocat
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 21,997
  • Joined: 22-May 03
  • Location:The call is coming from inside the house!!!!
  • Interests:Interesting.

Posted 28 July 2014 - 08:21 PM

Just finished ASSAIL.

Spoiler free first post in an otherwise spoilered thread here...
THIS IS YOUR REMINDER THAT THERE IS A
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
0

#13615 User is offline   Salt-Man Z 

  • My pen halts, though I do not
  • View gallery
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 4,166
  • Joined: 07-February 08
  • Location:Apple Valley, MN

Posted 28 July 2014 - 08:47 PM

View PostAbyss, on 28 July 2014 - 08:21 PM, said:

Just finished ASSAIL.

Spoiler free first post in an otherwise spoilered thread here...

Good to hear you enjoyed it (after Pat's blasting of it.) I just got the notification from Book Depository today that my copy has shipped.
"Here is light. You will say that it is not a living entity, but you miss the point that it is more, not less. Without occupying space, it fills the universe. It nourishes everything, yet itself feeds upon destruction. We claim to control it, but does it not perhaps cultivate us as a source of food? May it not be that all wood grows so that it can be set ablaze, and that men and women are born to kindle fires?"
―Gene Wolfe, The Citadel of the Autarch
0

#13616 User is offline   Abyss 

  • abyssus abyssum invocat
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 21,997
  • Joined: 22-May 03
  • Location:The call is coming from inside the house!!!!
  • Interests:Interesting.

Posted 28 July 2014 - 09:06 PM

View PostSalt-Man Z, on 28 July 2014 - 08:47 PM, said:

View PostAbyss, on 28 July 2014 - 08:21 PM, said:

Just finished ASSAIL.

Spoiler free first post in an otherwise spoilered thread here...

Good to hear you enjoyed it (after Pat's blasting of it.) I just got the notification from Book Depository today that my copy has shipped.


I see where Pat was coming from, they're his opinions, very informed opinions at that, and he's more than entitled to them, but he's clearly cold and dead inside a communist a cylon a clone Vladimir Putin from my side of the Malazanfan world, this was a solid and enjoyable book and likely ICE's best.

I hope more forumites agree with me, i guess we'll see.

In any event, when it arrives i hope you (all) enjoy it!
THIS IS YOUR REMINDER THAT THERE IS A
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
0

#13617 User is offline   stone monkey 

  • I'm the baddest man alive and I don't plan to die...
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: (COPPA) Users Awaiting Moderatio
  • Posts: 2,369
  • Joined: 28-July 03
  • Location:The Rainy City

Posted 28 July 2014 - 09:19 PM

View PostBinder of Demons, on 27 July 2014 - 08:06 PM, said:

View PostCocoreturns, on 26 July 2014 - 11:36 PM, said:

View PostBinder of Demons, on 26 July 2014 - 05:31 PM, said:

My only gripe is that Isaac Newton is being used a name/historical figure that is held in high esteem, to tie together science and magic in Britain from a few centuries back. And my problem with that is that Newton was a monumental douchebag, and I don't like seeing him get any props at all.

Who knows, maybe in the book he'll also turn out to have been a dick, who caused all manner of problems for lots of people he didn't like.


Because monumental douchebags can't be brilliant?


Nah, it's just I don't like seeing douchebags getting any more credit than they deserve, especially in a fictional context (which i am reading for enjoyment, and he's spoiling that enjoyment).


To be honest, I'm kind of at a loss about the logic here: in the real world we're very aware that Newton was, at times, a stunningly unpleasant human being, but we also do know he was one of the most brilliant men in the historical record and hold him in the highest esteem for his achievements despite his supremely awful personality. It's not an either/or proposition imo.

I mean, Einstein was a dick to his wife for years, Schrodinger was serially unfaithful to his, Heisenberg was a Nazi collaborator, Lavoisier was a tax collector in Prerevolutionary France (and they were scumbags), Kepler basically looted Tycho Brahe's life's work (almost before the body was cold, because Brahe REALLY didn't want him to have the data he collected)... the list goes on. Geniuses all; not terribly nice guys.

Aaronovitch could have used Robert Hooke (who would have been the smartest man in England, of his day, had Newton not been born), or he could have used Isaac Barrow (Newton's predecessor in the Lucasian Chair, the first person to hold it, and allegedly the man who would have invented the calculus, a generation earlier, had he been able to use the Binomial Theorem). But even to non students of the History of Science Newton bestrides the Enlightenment like a Colossus, so I would argue it's entirely appropriate for him to be given even that fictional prominence for name recognition value alone, never mind his other, more esoteric (nay occult), interests...

btw for another side of Newton, you might want to look at James Gleick's excellent biography of him; especially those parts dealing with his nightmarish childhood, his relationship with his flighty half niece, Catherine Barton, (whom he is supposed to have adored) and also what may have been a doomed affair with Nichalas Fatio de Duiller (which ended in betrayal by Fatio and allegedly left Newton heartbroken and pretty much destroyed mentally, prompting him getting out of the Natural Philosophy business and into his job as Master of the Mint). It's not just as simple as him having been a dick; to quote Ben Goldacre: "It's slightly more complicated than that..."
If an opinion contrary to your own makes you angry, that is a sign that you are subconsciously aware of having no good reason for thinking as you do. If some one maintains that two and two are five, or that Iceland is on the equator, you feel pity rather than anger, unless you know so little of arithmetic or geography that his opinion shakes your own contrary conviction. … So whenever you find yourself getting angry about a difference of opinion, be on your guard; you will probably find, on examination, that your belief is going beyond what the evidence warrants. Bertrand Russell

#13618 User is offline   amphibian 

  • Ribbit
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 8,003
  • Joined: 28-September 06
  • Location:Upstate NY
  • Interests:Hopping around

Posted 28 July 2014 - 09:36 PM

Hooke was an even bigger douchebag than Newton.
I survived the Permian and all I got was this t-shirt.
0

#13619 User is offline   QuickTidal 

  • Lord of the Waters
  • Group: Team Quick Ben
  • Posts: 21,376
  • Joined: 05-November 05
  • Location:At Sea?
  • Interests:DoubleStamping. Movies. Reading.

Posted 28 July 2014 - 10:35 PM

I dunno about Coco, but my comment about geniuses was a joke.
"When the last tree has fallen, and the rivers are poisoned, you cannot eat money, oh no." ~Aurora

"Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone." ~Ursula Vernon
0

#13620 User is offline   Binder of Demons 

  • Lord of Light
  • View gallery
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 1,617
  • Joined: 02-March 07
  • Location:Ireland
  • - Thread Killer -

Posted 28 July 2014 - 11:07 PM

Some very good points there by SM, and I'll basically leave it there, but I stand by my earlier comment that while I know Newton was a genius, he was also a spectacular knob, and I just don't like seeing a (seemingly lazy at times) representation of him as Newton the great man in a fictional setting. A personal foible I know, but it follows on for my detesting of bullying and dickish behaviour in real life, which I don't think it should be glossed over regardless of how talented someone is/was. And in these books, it's really just been Newton wasn't he great (so far), and it irks me. I'm sure most other people wouldnt be bothered, but what can i say. Love the rest of the books though so far.

Neal Stephenson did a better job of introducing a fictional version of Newton that was brilliant but flawed in the Baroque Cycle books.

It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt - Mark Twain

Never argue with an idiot!
They'll drag you down to their level, and then beat you with experience!
- Anonymous
0

Share this topic:


  • 1486 Pages +
  • « First
  • 679
  • 680
  • 681
  • 682
  • 683
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

107 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 107 guests, 0 anonymous users