[D'rek]

Speaking of which, for those that haven't been keeping track, the cultural explore deck is all just Freelancers and Mercenary Outfits left, while the hazardous deck is all just Volatile Fuel Source/Expedition/Core Mines left. So when you're exploring planets of those types, you might as well just drop a provisional instruction of what to do for which card comes up.

[Tattersail_]

D, on 17 February 2021 - 02:45 PM, said:

@Tatts - just posted your explore, it's a Freelancers, let me know how you want to resolve it and then I'll add the agendas to the start of status phase.

If I am to produce with it am I able to use Tungstantus a second time in the same post?


Tungstantus says when you use a unit tp produce so I assume I do not get a TG from this.


I have updated my post, spent a TG to produce a destroyer

This post has been edited by Tattersail_: 17 February 2021 - 03:01 PM

[Khellendros]

Tattersail_, on 17 February 2021 - 02:58 PM, said:

D, on 17 February 2021 - 02:45 PM, said:

@Tatts - just posted your explore, it's a Freelancers, let me know how you want to resolve it and then I'll add the agendas to the start of status phase.

If I am to produce with it am I able to use Tungstantus a second time in the same post?


Tungstantus says when you use a unit tp produce so I assume I do not get a TG from this.


I have updated my post, spent a TG to produce a destroyer

Yeah, I think this falls into the same kind of category as my Chaos Mapping ability. While I'm 'producing' in a space which contains a unit with Production, I'm not building in the traditional sense and so can't use something like Sarween Tools to offset the cost.

[D'rek]

Correct. No unit is using the PRODUCTION ability in this case.

[D'rek]

Agendas are up.

[Khellendros]

What could we be electing someone for? What a mystery!

This post has been edited by Khellendros: 17 February 2021 - 03:26 PM

[Khellendros]

Also, we're definitely getting rid of Tatts' and IH's PDS, right?

[Tattersail_]

It is only 1 PDS though, I had nightmares I was getting rid of all PDS's or units in a wormhole! They would have been devastating!

[Tattersail_]

Looks like I am going to go for construction on strategy, get 2 PDS' back up and firing

[Khellendros]

Tattersail_, on 17 February 2021 - 03:33 PM, said:

Looks like I am going to go for construction on strategy, get 2 PDS' back up and firing

Construction is probably my least likely choice, so I'd be happy with that.


Edit: Depending on PO!

This post has been edited by Khellendros: 17 February 2021 - 03:34 PM

[Khellendros]

(By the way I do in fact know what we'd be electing for)

[twelve]

Khellendros, on 17 February 2021 - 03:35 PM, said:

(By the way I do in fact know what we'd be electing for)

Well since we dont know if it's a positive or negative outcome for the elected player, I suggest we get a volunteer that we elect in case there is a VP attached to it. Unfortunately I think it might have to be me as I'm guaranteed not to win this round as I have no secret objectives so even with Imperial I can only get to 8 VP. We would have to see if there are other candidates after the status phase to see where they stand in points.

[Khellendros]

As this is information valuable to everyone, I may be willing to reveal what the secret agenda is for 1TG from each player (or if you don't have any TGs, then getting someone to pay for you. Basically, 5TGs).

[Blend]

Khellendros, on 17 February 2021 - 04:36 PM, said:

As this is information valuable to everyone, I may be willing to reveal what the secret agenda is for 1TG from each player (or if you don't have any TGs, then getting someone to pay for you. Basically, 5TGs).

LoL, that valuation is, frankly, insane.

I say we just vote someone who is middle of the pack for the hidden agenda. That way if it helps them, no biggie, and if it hurts them, then one less person we need to worry about in the upcoming round. Either Morgoth or myself, I think. We'll see how the rest of the status phase pans out.

[twelve]

Most of the the elect player agendas are either neutral or a positive for the recipient but with the possible VP for Political Censure the only way to guarantee another round would be to elect me. Only Armed forces Standardization would truly hurt. And that is 1 in 14 unless any other besides Search Warrant has been reviewed that I missed. Those are terrible odds.

[Khellendros]

Blend, on 17 February 2021 - 04:50 PM, said:

Khellendros, on 17 February 2021 - 04:36 PM, said:

As this is information valuable to everyone, I may be willing to reveal what the secret agenda is for 1TG from each player (or if you don't have any TGs, then getting someone to pay for you. Basically, 5TGs).

LoL, that valuation is, frankly, insane.

I say we just vote someone who is middle of the pack for the hidden agenda. That way if it helps them, no biggie, and if it hurts them, then one less person we need to worry about in the upcoming round. Either Morgoth or myself, I think. We'll see how the rest of the status phase pans out.

lol, "vote someone neutral. Also, vote me"

Pretty much everyone is middle of the pack, that's a more tricky decision than you make it out to be

This post has been edited by Khellendros: 17 February 2021 - 04:59 PM

[Tattersail_]

Khell purposefully does not score an objective. Wow.

[Khellendros]

Tattersail_, on 17 February 2021 - 04:59 PM, said:

Khell purposefully does not score an objective. Wow.

Come again?

[twelve]

Yeah I think it's more a matter of we stopped him from being able to score anything

[Blend]

Khellendros, on 17 February 2021 - 04:59 PM, said:

Blend, on 17 February 2021 - 04:50 PM, said:

Khellendros, on 17 February 2021 - 04:36 PM, said:

As this is information valuable to everyone, I may be willing to reveal what the secret agenda is for 1TG from each player (or if you don't have any TGs, then getting someone to pay for you. Basically, 5TGs).

LoL, that valuation is, frankly, insane.

I say we just vote someone who is middle of the pack for the hidden agenda. That way if it helps them, no biggie, and if it hurts them, then one less person we need to worry about in the upcoming round. Either Morgoth or myself, I think. We'll see how the rest of the status phase pans out.

lol, "vote someone neutral. Also, vote me"

Pretty much everyone is middle of the pack, that's a more tricky decision than you make it out to be

I mean, Tatts and IH are both forces to be reckoned with, so I would consider them top of the pack. Twelve may not have SOs, but he's sitting on Rex as the Winnu, so that puts him up there too. You're likely to have the same amount of VPs as the leaders - electing you would be insane after all the work we did to stop you from scoring this round. That leaves Morgoth and I. Morgoth's got more plastic on the board and is frankly better defended than I am. I've stretched myself thin, so I don't see myself actually winning unless there are some very specific things that happen between now and the end of the next round.