TI IV ALPHA Chat
#321
Posted 12 July 2019 - 07:35 PM
Not certain how I managed to get the wrong link that time. But fixed now.
#322
Posted 12 July 2019 - 07:37 PM
Itwæs Nom, on 12 July 2019 - 07:12 PM, said:
Well, that is something.
@ Twelve: I won't need a refresh.
Not sure if your Trade policy and plonking down your strongest (only?) asset down on MR is the best play, but I guess you count on Tatts to not exploit that.
Everyone is entitled to his own wrong opinion. - Lizrad
#323
Posted 12 July 2019 - 07:56 PM
Gnaw, my fighters should be with my warsun. They weren't move on the latest map update.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
#324
Posted 12 July 2019 - 07:59 PM
twelve, on 12 July 2019 - 07:56 PM, said:
Gnaw, my fighters should be with my warsun. They weren't move on the latest map update.
There are also a bunch of CTs still on the board that should be removed (in Tapper's slice at least)
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
#325
Posted 12 July 2019 - 08:05 PM
Tapper - I realize you're probably not going to be too pleased with my most recent action, but if you're still looking to swap commodities, I'll do a 3:3 with you if you want!
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
#326
#327
Posted 12 July 2019 - 08:30 PM
D, on 08 July 2019 - 07:06 PM, said:
This^^ I was expecting to get to warfare-build another carrier and move out from my HW to a second system.
I'll move adjacent first turn next round and give you my Trade Agreement + 1 tg for your 4. I'll try and pick a low-# SC so there's no risk of TRADE played before then.
I'll move adjacent first turn next round and give you my Trade Agreement + 1 tg for your 4. I'll try and pick a low-# SC so there's no risk of TRADE played before then.
Well, so much for this, eh? Lots of "promises" from you so far this game, Drek.
That being said, I probably wouldn't have agreed to this, I want to flip my commodities, not trade them away for future TGs.
This post has been edited by Blend: 12 July 2019 - 08:31 PM
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
#328
Posted 12 July 2019 - 08:38 PM
Drek - I don't agree to that trade that you've posted. I'll do a 3:3, but I'm not giving you all my commodities for a Trade Agreement I won't even be able to use until next round.
This post has been edited by Blend: 12 July 2019 - 08:38 PM
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
#329
Posted 12 July 2019 - 08:39 PM
Blend, on 12 July 2019 - 08:38 PM, said:
Drek - I don't agree to that trade that you've posted. I'll do a 3:3, but I'm not giving you all my commodities for a Trade Agreement I won't even be able to use until next round.
Though I guess you can't do a 3:3 as you only had 1 TG left, right? Well, I'll do a 1:1, then. But not the trade you've posted.
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
#330
Posted 12 July 2019 - 09:49 PM
Blend, on 12 July 2019 - 08:30 PM, said:
D, on 08 July 2019 - 07:06 PM, said:
This^^ I was expecting to get to warfare-build another carrier and move out from my HW to a second system.
I'll move adjacent first turn next round and give you my Trade Agreement + 1 tg for your 4. I'll try and pick a low-# SC so there's no risk of TRADE played before then.
I'll move adjacent first turn next round and give you my Trade Agreement + 1 tg for your 4. I'll try and pick a low-# SC so there's no risk of TRADE played before then.
Well, so much for this, eh? Lots of "promises" from you so far this game, Drek.
That being said, I probably wouldn't have agreed to this, I want to flip my commodities, not trade them away for future TGs.
You did...
Blend, on 08 July 2019 - 07:07 PM, said:
Appreciated - kinda screws my round too, but such are the vagaries of life! I probably would have researched Sarween Tools though, had I known you weren't going to connect. My own fault for not realizing that, I guess!
Or at least I interpreted the above as agreement. Oh well, it's fine to change your mind. I'll change my action, but it's hardly worth me doing an inefficient action for the sake of 1:1 so I won't be going to Quann this turn.
#331
#332
Posted 13 July 2019 - 05:10 AM
Gnaw, you gave me a space dock instead of a PDS on the map
#333
Posted 13 July 2019 - 05:26 AM
#334
Posted 13 July 2019 - 05:41 AM
Galactic Council, on 29 June 2019 - 05:45 PM, said:
Tapper, on 29 June 2019 - 08:24 AM, said:
Blend, on 28 June 2019 - 03:03 PM, said:
Hmmm, so my neighbours are Tapper and Drek. Winnu on one side, Arborec on the other... And lots of empty space between the trees and I. That's good.
Tapper - thoughts on Saudor?
Tapper - thoughts on Saudor?
My proposal would be Asteroid Field - DMZ. Saudor for you, Dal Bootha/Xxha + Starpoint/NA mine (I will likely build there). Wellon seems more your slicw than mine. I of course very much want MR but I have no interest in the B wormhole whatsoever.
This arrangement works for me! To a long and mutually prosperous alliance!
Yeah, Blend. Not too pleased at all.
Everyone is entitled to his own wrong opinion. - Lizrad
#335
Posted 13 July 2019 - 05:47 AM
I will need some time to think on my move. It's a little less straightforward now.
Everyone is entitled to his own wrong opinion. - Lizrad
#336
Posted 13 July 2019 - 05:51 AM
Blend, on 12 July 2019 - 08:05 PM, said:
Tapper - I realize you're probably not going to be too pleased with my most recent action, but if you're still looking to swap commodities, I'll do a 3:3 with you if you want!
But a 3:3 it is. I will process it during my turn.
Everyone is entitled to his own wrong opinion. - Lizrad
#337
Posted 13 July 2019 - 06:06 AM
oooo My first fight to process. Sweet!
Now...how many mistakes will I make?
Now...how many mistakes will I make?
#338
Posted 13 July 2019 - 06:06 AM
I know it was a bold move, we will see how things go!! Thank you for still swapping my commodities, good luck on the fight!
#339
Posted 13 July 2019 - 06:19 AM
D, on 12 July 2019 - 09:49 PM, said:
Blend, on 12 July 2019 - 08:30 PM, said:
D, on 08 July 2019 - 07:06 PM, said:
This^^ I was expecting to get to warfare-build another carrier and move out from my HW to a second system.
I'll move adjacent first turn next round and give you my Trade Agreement + 1 tg for your 4. I'll try and pick a low-# SC so there's no risk of TRADE played before then.
I'll move adjacent first turn next round and give you my Trade Agreement + 1 tg for your 4. I'll try and pick a low-# SC so there's no risk of TRADE played before then.
Well, so much for this, eh? Lots of "promises" from you so far this game, Drek.
That being said, I probably wouldn't have agreed to this, I want to flip my commodities, not trade them away for future TGs.
You did...
Blend, on 08 July 2019 - 07:07 PM, said:
Appreciated - kinda screws my round too, but such are the vagaries of life! I probably would have researched Sarween Tools though, had I known you weren't going to connect. My own fault for not realizing that, I guess!
Or at least I interpreted the above as agreement. Oh well, it's fine to change your mind. I'll change my action, but it's hardly worth me doing an inefficient action for the sake of 1:1 so I won't be going to Quann this turn.
I am sorry, what I said definitely seemed like agreement.
I still would prefer to not have too much animosity between us.
Is there anything I can do to mend this rift?
#340
Posted 13 July 2019 - 06:24 AM
What was that dice rolling website we used for Eclipse?