[Gnaw]

Heh. Khell was just here. But didn’t post new phase.

[twelve]

Tapper what's the cost for a free refresh? And are you using trade early?

[D'rek]

Gnaw, on 16 March 2019 - 11:22 PM, said:

Heh. Khell was just here. But didn’t post new phase.

Perhaps you should wait? Tapper or others may have left provisionals for end-of-strategy-phase abilities.

[Gnaw]

Eh. You’re right.

[Tapper]

D, on 16 March 2019 - 11:38 PM, said:

Gnaw, on 16 March 2019 - 11:22 PM, said:

Heh. Khell was just here. But didn’t post new phase.

Perhaps you should wait? Tapper or others may have left provisionals for end-of-strategy-phase abilities.

I cannot afford QDN. So, no action from me.

[Gnaw]

Well, everyone knows what Nom and I are doing. Just the details in doubt.

[Gnaw]

Tapper, on 17 March 2019 - 05:23 AM, said:

D, on 16 March 2019 - 11:38 PM, said:

Gnaw, on 16 March 2019 - 11:22 PM, said:

Heh. Khell was just here. But didn't post new phase.

Perhaps you should wait? Tapper or others may have left provisionals for end-of-strategy-phase abilities.

I cannot afford QDN. So, no action from me.

Are you interested in IH’s deal ref: Speaker token?

[Gnaw]

Imperial Historian, on 14 March 2019 - 07:18 PM, said:

Morgoth, tapper, nom and gnaw would you be amenable to a deal where I take politics, and make gnaw speaker and between you, you pay 6tg and leave me trade? I'll leave it to you how you split that cost up and who gets what card, but saves tapper and gnaw having to pay 3tg each to use there quantum data hubs and leaves the speaker token on our side of the board once more so nom and morgoth would both get good picks as well.

This one.

I’m in for 2TG, leaving Trade for him, and the card of your choice for you (especially so for a free refresh).

[Tapper]

twelve, on 16 March 2019 - 11:35 PM, said:

Tapper what's the cost for a free refresh? And are you using trade early?

Votes, except (obviously) for Gnaw, and perhaps less obviously so for IH.
Timing is flexible, I am open to offers.

IH: free refresh if you do not pillage me this turn for the TGs paid to me for playing Trade and for transferring Shields Holding to D'rek.

Blend, Morgoth, D'rek, Twelve, Nom: 3 votes on an agenda of my choice in the upcoming agenda phase. Positive effects of said agenda(s) will target me, negative effects will not target anyone who gave votes for the refresh.

Gnaw: I would have happily accepted votes, but... well, Nekro. Let's work something out.

Whomever holds Tatts' Trade Agreement right now, for Tatts' TA:
3 of your votes on an Agenda of my choice during the next Agenda phase.
I will not accept Tatts' votes unless he owns his own PN right now.

Any negative effects of the chosen agenda(s) will not hurt the player holding Tatts' TA PN at this time.

[Gnaw]

Tapper, on 17 March 2019 - 06:29 AM, said:

twelve, on 16 March 2019 - 11:35 PM, said:

Tapper what's the cost for a free refresh? And are you using trade early?

Votes, except (obviously) for Gnaw, and perhaps less obviously so for IH.
Timing is flexible, I am open to offers.

IH: free refresh if you do not pillage me this turn for the TGs paid to me for playing Trade and for transferring Shields Holding to D'rek.

Blend, Morgoth, D'rek, Twelve, Nom: 3 votes on an agenda of my choice in the upcoming agenda phase. Positive effects of said agenda(s) will target me, negative effects will not target anyone who gave votes for the refresh.

Gnaw: I would have happily accepted votes, but... well, Nekro. Let's work something out.

Whomever holds Tatts' Trade Agreement right now, for Tatts' TA:
3 of your votes on an Agenda of my choice during the next Agenda phase.
I will not accept Tatts' votes unless he owns his own PN right now.

Any negative effects of the chosen agenda(s) will not hurt the player holding Tatts' TA PN at this time.

You’re pretty vague there Tapper. Think you could add some details so people aren’t confused as to what you want?

[Gnaw]

I’m off to bed; khell has my action.

[Tapper]

Gnaw, on 17 March 2019 - 06:43 AM, said:

Tapper, on 17 March 2019 - 06:29 AM, said:

twelve, on 16 March 2019 - 11:35 PM, said:

Tapper what's the cost for a free refresh? And are you using trade early?

Votes, except (obviously) for Gnaw, and perhaps less obviously so for IH.
Timing is flexible, I am open to offers.

IH: free refresh if you do not pillage me this turn for the TGs paid to me for playing Trade and for transferring Shields Holding to D'rek.

Blend, Morgoth, D'rek, Twelve, Nom: 3 votes on an agenda of my choice in the upcoming agenda phase. Positive effects of said agenda(s) will target me, negative effects will not target anyone who gave votes for the refresh.

Gnaw: I would have happily accepted votes, but... well, Nekro. Let's work something out.

Whomever holds Tatts' Trade Agreement right now, for Tatts' TA:
3 of your votes on an Agenda of my choice during the next Agenda phase.
I will not accept Tatts' votes unless he owns his own PN right now.

Any negative effects of the chosen agenda(s) will not hurt the player holding Tatts' TA PN at this time.

You’re pretty vague there Tapper. Think you could add some details so people aren’t confused as to what you want?

I think it is pretty clear?

3 Votes towards a result of my choosing on an agenda of my choice during the next agenda phase.

In the spirit of equality I will ask players to support a result that, if it passes, does not target any of those who gave me votes, for good or for bad.

[Tapper]

Gnaw, on 17 March 2019 - 05:37 AM, said:

Imperial Historian, on 14 March 2019 - 07:18 PM, said:

Morgoth, tapper, nom and gnaw would you be amenable to a deal where I take politics, and make gnaw speaker and between you, you pay 6tg and leave me trade? I'll leave it to you how you split that cost up and who gets what card, but saves tapper and gnaw having to pay 3tg each to use there quantum data hubs and leaves the speaker token on our side of the board once more so nom and morgoth would both get good picks as well.

This one.

I’m in for 2TG, leaving Trade for him, and the card of your choice for you (especially so for a free refresh).

I would be open to paying 2 TG for that deal (assuming IH is not going to pillage us on the payment to him).
I do not think it is a big secret that I will want Technology.

EDIT: I might have to take Imperial, though. The whole commodity thing likely prevents me from scoring a VP this round.

This post has been edited by Tapper: 17 March 2019 - 07:25 AM

[Tattersail_]

Tapper you have my votes, I have my trade PN.

[Tapper]

Tattersail_, on 17 March 2019 - 07:37 AM, said:

Tapper you have my votes, I have my trade PN.

Coolio.

[Gnaw]

Tapper, on 17 March 2019 - 07:02 AM, said:

Gnaw, on 17 March 2019 - 06:43 AM, said:

Tapper, on 17 March 2019 - 06:29 AM, said:

twelve, on 16 March 2019 - 11:35 PM, said:

Tapper what's the cost for a free refresh? And are you using trade early?

Votes, except (obviously) for Gnaw, and perhaps less obviously so for IH.
Timing is flexible, I am open to offers.

IH: free refresh if you do not pillage me this turn for the TGs paid to me for playing Trade and for transferring Shields Holding to D'rek.

Blend, Morgoth, D'rek, Twelve, Nom: 3 votes on an agenda of my choice in the upcoming agenda phase. Positive effects of said agenda(s) will target me, negative effects will not target anyone who gave votes for the refresh.

Gnaw: I would have happily accepted votes, but... well, Nekro. Let's work something out.

Whomever holds Tatts' Trade Agreement right now, for Tatts' TA:
3 of your votes on an Agenda of my choice during the next Agenda phase.
I will not accept Tatts' votes unless he owns his own PN right now.

Any negative effects of the chosen agenda(s) will not hurt the player holding Tatts' TA PN at this time.

You're pretty vague there Tapper. Think you could add some details so people aren't confused as to what you want?

I think it is pretty clear?

3 Votes towards a result of my choosing on an agenda of my choice during the next agenda phase.

In the spirit of equality I will ask players to support a result that, if it passes, does not target any of those who gave me votes, for good or for bad.

Was joke Tapper.

[Imperial Historian]

Tapper, on 17 March 2019 - 06:29 AM, said:

twelve, on 16 March 2019 - 11:35 PM, said:

Tapper what's the cost for a free refresh? And are you using trade early?

Votes, except (obviously) for Gnaw, and perhaps less obviously so for IH.
Timing is flexible, I am open to offers.

IH: free refresh if you do not pillage me this turn for the TGs paid to me for playing Trade and for transferring Shields Holding to D'rek.

Blend, Morgoth, D'rek, Twelve, Nom: 3 votes on an agenda of my choice in the upcoming agenda phase. Positive effects of said agenda(s) will target me, negative effects will not target anyone who gave votes for the refresh.

Gnaw: I would have happily accepted votes, but... well, Nekro. Let's work something out.

Whomever holds Tatts' Trade Agreement right now, for Tatts' TA:
3 of your votes on an Agenda of my choice during the next Agenda phase.
I will not accept Tatts' votes unless he owns his own PN right now.

Any negative effects of the chosen agenda(s) will not hurt the player holding Tatts' TA PN at this time.

You don't have commodities this turn right?

I hold morgoths trade PN, if you give us both refreshes I will not pillage you this turn.

Otherwise yes I will accept a free refresh for no pillage on those two trades.

[Galactic Council]

Map has been updated to beginning of round.

[Galactic Council]

Battle resolved - Gnaw, it wouldn't hurt just to be a bit more patient before posting! Also, when leaving me provisionals, why not also say what tech you want to assimilate if you're successful so I don't have to ask you every time

[twelve]

Tapper I'll gladly give you 3 vites. I'll triple it if you play it round 1. Would you be okay with exchanging commodities when it gets to my turn? If not D'rek if you refresh would you like to exchange commodities?