Malazan Empire: Twilight Imperium (Game 3) - Chat Thread - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 242 Pages +
  • « First
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Twilight Imperium (Game 3) - Chat Thread

#1981 User is offline   Gnaw 

  • Recovering eating disordered addict of HHM
  • View gallery
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 5,966
  • Joined: 16-June 12

Posted 05 March 2019 - 11:48 PM

A couple more get played and I’m just going to go ahead and take Rex. No point in me playing Technology for CTs when all the secondaries are gone.
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
0

#1982 User is offline   Blend 

  • Gentleman of High House Mafia
  • View gallery
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 4,579
  • Joined: 28-March 03
  • Location:Ottawa

Posted 06 March 2019 - 12:13 AM

View PostGnaw, on 05 March 2019 - 11:48 PM, said:

A couple more get played and I’m just going to go ahead and take Rex. No point in me playing Technology for CTs when all the secondaries are gone.


I can live with that, but I'll have to delay moving off Lodd Eru until you play Technology. I can stall a couple of turns, but that's about it.
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
0

#1983 User is offline   Morgoth 

  • executor emeritus
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 11,448
  • Joined: 24-January 03
  • Location:the void

Posted 06 March 2019 - 07:50 AM

View PostGnaw, on 05 March 2019 - 11:48 PM, said:

A couple more get played and I'm just going to go ahead and take Rex. No point in me playing Technology for CTs when all the secondaries are gone.


You'll get 6 tokens with technology if you want, so if nothing else you'll be well placed for next round. And at least with diplomacy being played so early, most wont get that much of a benefit from it anyway.

Though I wont begrudge you MR. As Nekro it's fun being in the center where everyone wants to attack you.

This post has been edited by Morgoth: 06 March 2019 - 07:51 AM

Take good care to keep relations civil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
0

#1984 User is offline   Morgoth 

  • executor emeritus
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 11,448
  • Joined: 24-January 03
  • Location:the void

Posted 06 March 2019 - 08:24 AM

Though I would very much prefer if you played it first round.
Take good care to keep relations civil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
0

#1985 User is offline   Gnaw 

  • Recovering eating disordered addict of HHM
  • View gallery
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 5,966
  • Joined: 16-June 12

Posted 06 March 2019 - 08:41 AM

View PostMorgoth, on 05 March 2019 - 11:45 AM, said:

MacGnaw, I have a destroyer available for trade. Feel free to make offers if you are in need of technology.





View PostMorgoth, on 06 March 2019 - 08:24 AM, said:

Though I would very much prefer if you played it first round.


Hmm. Seems like we have a deal to be made.
😁
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
0

#1986 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 06 March 2019 - 08:50 AM

I can't quite believe you are letting d'rek keep rex for another round and claim 6 resources and a VP from it.. on top of the 4 resources she gets when someone does eventually take it.

It's there and empty!
0

#1987 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 06 March 2019 - 08:54 AM

And considering the fact the 8 influence VP is there you are practically giving her that for free as well.
0

#1988 User is offline   Morgoth 

  • executor emeritus
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 11,448
  • Joined: 24-January 03
  • Location:the void

Posted 06 March 2019 - 09:18 AM

View PostGnaw, on 06 March 2019 - 08:41 AM, said:

View PostMorgoth, on 05 March 2019 - 11:45 AM, said:

MacGnaw, I have a destroyer available for trade. Feel free to make offers if you are in need of technology.





View PostMorgoth, on 06 March 2019 - 08:24 AM, said:

Though I would very much prefer if you played it first round.


Hmm. Seems like we have a deal to be made.
😁


Oh, no it's not that important to me. Go ahead and take Rex, as IH says it's 2 VPs for D'rek if she keeps it one more round.
Take good care to keep relations civil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
0

#1989 User is offline   Gnaw 

  • Recovering eating disordered addict of HHM
  • View gallery
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 5,966
  • Joined: 16-June 12

Posted 06 March 2019 - 09:34 AM

View PostImperial Historian, on 06 March 2019 - 08:50 AM, said:

I can't quite believe you are letting d'rek keep rex for another round and claim 6 resources and a VP from it.. on top of the 4 resources she gets when someone does eventually take it.

It's there and empty!



View PostImperial Historian, on 06 March 2019 - 08:54 AM, said:

And considering the fact the 8 influence VP is there you are practically giving her that for free as well.


So you’ll be taking it then? Mr. 8 Initiative and has 2 cruisers, 2 infantry, 1 carrier, and 2 fighters available.
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
0

#1990 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 06 March 2019 - 09:36 AM

I wish I could but she has my ceasefire. Otherwise I definitely would.
0

#1991 User is offline   Gnaw 

  • Recovering eating disordered addict of HHM
  • View gallery
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 5,966
  • Joined: 16-June 12

Posted 06 March 2019 - 09:37 AM

Seems like a good time to force her to use it right?
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
0

#1992 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,245
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 06 March 2019 - 09:47 AM

It's important enough that she used an action card to get it, made a deal with Morgoth to keep it, her racial doesn't go for nothing. So Morgoth will get a good tech out of it. So making sure she does not get to use it first turn should be ALL our goals. IH forces her to use his ceasefire it opens up other avenues in were he can actually put pressure on her from the other side AND if she attacks him he gets his racial back and all those TG's D'rek will accumulate being attacked by players. So I can see why IH would want to do that. He also has logistics so can always remove the token that gets placed.

If that happens then Gnaw you could also put pressure on or take Mec Rex this round with a token force. Whoever takes it off you will be giving you a free tech. In fact you moving in first will then mean IH can pressure elsewhere. You go before him, and it is first turn that this needs to happen.
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

#1993 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,245
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 06 March 2019 - 09:48 AM

View PostGnaw, on 06 March 2019 - 09:37 AM, said:

Seems like a good time to force her to use it right?


If he does then she'll still gain the point with Imperial. As far as I am aware right now only you can take Rex this turn.
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

#1994 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 06 March 2019 - 09:48 AM

I doubt she would with all my ships out of position she'd just take my planets and laugh at my inability to stop her.

I get the sense you are worried about me attacking you gnaw after you take rex. I will not move any ships to rex unless you pay me to this turn.

I could even be persuaded to trade you Tatts racial PN which would set you up well to defend it.

Or perhaps signal jam d'reks dreadnoughts in bereg lirta if that's what you are worried about.
0

#1995 User is offline   Gnaw 

  • Recovering eating disordered addict of HHM
  • View gallery
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 5,966
  • Joined: 16-June 12

Posted 06 March 2019 - 10:18 AM

What I’m worried about is losing a bunch of secondaries. I’m already shit out of luck with Diplomacy. If people want me to take Rex, I need a boatload of assurances that others won’t play their strategy cards until after I play Technology turn 2.
Except Tatts. Warfare would be helpful for me for this.
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
0

#1996 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,245
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 06 March 2019 - 10:23 AM

View PostGnaw, on 06 March 2019 - 10:18 AM, said:

What I'm worried about is losing a bunch of secondaries. I'm already shit out of luck with Diplomacy. If people want me to take Rex, I need a boatload of assurances that others won't play their strategy cards until after I play Technology turn 2.
Except Tatts. Warfare would be helpful for me for this.


Blend - Construction
IH - Logistics
Nom - Trade
Tapper - Politics


Is it only Blend and IH you need assurances from?
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

#1997 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 06 March 2019 - 10:33 AM

I will not be playing logistics turn 1 :)

So yes I'll play it after you.
0

#1998 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 06 March 2019 - 10:39 AM

Blends already said he's playing construction turn 1, so you would be losing out on potentially political and imperial secondaries.
0

#1999 User is offline   Tapper 

  • Lover of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 6,646
  • Joined: 29-June 04
  • Location:Delft, Holland.

Posted 06 March 2019 - 10:48 AM

View PostGnaw, on 06 March 2019 - 10:18 AM, said:

What I’m worried about is losing a bunch of secondaries. I’m already shit out of luck with Diplomacy. If people want me to take Rex, I need a boatload of assurances that others won’t play their strategy cards until after I play Technology turn 2.
Except Tatts. Warfare would be helpful for me for this.

Cool with me.
Everyone is entitled to his own wrong opinion. - Lizrad
0

#2000 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 06 March 2019 - 03:44 PM

Your cruiser bravely flew in the way of the PDS shots directed at your carrier, Tapper.
0

Share this topic:


  • 242 Pages +
  • « First
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users