[Galactic Council]

Game map has been updated to the end of Gnaw's turn.

[Tattersail_]

Ignore spank me.

This post has been edited by Hugin & Munin: 21 September 2018 - 11:58 PM

[twelve]

Tatts, what about I allow the detroyer to leave as payment instead of the reduction of action cards or trade good payment?

This post has been edited by twelve: 22 September 2018 - 12:26 AM

[D'rek]

Galactic Council, on 21 September 2018 - 10:28 PM, said:

Game map has been updated to the end of Gnaw's turn.

Glad to know you weren't eaten by a tornado:)

[Gnaw]

D, on 22 September 2018 - 12:47 AM, said:

Galactic Council, on 21 September 2018 - 10:28 PM, said:

Game map has been updated to the end of Gnaw's turn.

Glad to know you weren't eaten by a tornado:)

It’s your turn.

[D'rek]

Gnaw, on 22 September 2018 - 04:11 PM, said:

D, on 22 September 2018 - 12:47 AM, said:

Galactic Council, on 21 September 2018 - 10:28 PM, said:

Game map has been updated to the end of Gnaw's turn.

Glad to know you weren't eaten by a tornado:)

It’s your turn.

Donezo

[D'rek]

@Tatts - we doing production biomes again this round? And you're giving me 1 for New Albion, right? Might as well do both at the same time, whenever it comes up.

[Tattersail_]

As per our agreement you were giving me 1 TG back when I do PB for the cost of losing Lazar. Similarly next round I'm giving you 1 TG for cost of New Albion.

We can just call it even though?

[Tattersail_]

twelve, on 22 September 2018 - 12:25 AM, said:

Tatts, what about I allow the detroyer to leave as payment instead of the reduction of action cards or trade good payment?

My turn is coming up. Right now I'm sitting on 10 TGs which look really attractive to spend.

I'm not bothered about the destroyer.

So how much do you want that VP this round? Right now I'm looking at 5 Cts which may enable the 2VP objective.

Either a cancelled AC or 2 TG along with my Trade PN.

[Galactic Council]

Game map updated to the end of D'rek's turn.

[D'rek]

Tattersail_, on 22 September 2018 - 05:24 PM, said:

As per our agreement you were giving me 1 TG back when I do PB for the cost of losing Lazar.

Similarly next round I'm giving you 1 TG for cost of New Albion.

We can just call it even though?

That makes way more sense than the convoluted plan in my head. Sounds good

[Khellendros]

I'm out at a birthday - will post late tonight probably.

[twelve]

Tattersail_, on 22 September 2018 - 05:36 PM, said:

twelve, on 22 September 2018 - 12:25 AM, said:

Tatts, what about I allow the detroyer to leave as payment instead of the reduction of action cards or trade good payment?

My turn is coming up. Right now I'm sitting on 10 TGs which look really attractive to spend.

I'm not bothered about the destroyer.

So how much do you want that VP this round? Right now I'm looking at 5 Cts which may enable the 2VP objective.

Either a cancelled AC or 2 TG along with my Trade PN.

I guess I'll choose the canceled action card.

[Gnaw]

IH, Morgoth, Tapper

[twelve]

Tatts, you have listed 2 of my pns in your last couple of posts. You only have 1. You have Khell's trade agreement not mine.

[Khellendros]

twelve, on 23 September 2018 - 04:12 PM, said:

Tatts, you have listed 2 of my pns in your last couple of posts. You only have 1. You have Khell's trade agreement not mine.

He used mine, so I have it back.

This post has been edited by Khellendros: 23 September 2018 - 04:44 PM

[Tattersail_]

twelve, on 23 September 2018 - 04:12 PM, said:

Tatts, you have listed 2 of my pns in your last couple of posts. You only have 1. You have Khell's trade agreement not mine.

I'll sort it on computer tomorrow

[Imperial Historian]

Flying to the us, stuck a move in.

Gnaw were you still wanting to move the wormhole in bereg?

[Morgoth]

Sorry Nom, but if I am to compete for the victory I need to be able to fulfill more of the potential new public objectives. With the lack of other options for expansion, and with your continued willingness to leave the system entirely empty of ships, I couldn't justify keeping back any longer. It's a gamble on my part, I recognize that, but my small slice of the galaxy isn't enough to allow me to compete.


edit: Never mind - I guess we'll just stay the way we are and I'll find some other solution for expansion.

This post has been edited by Morgoth: 24 September 2018 - 09:06 AM

[Morgoth]

I am doing this on the assumption that I will not lose Nom's support for the throne since there's no ships in the system. If I've misunderstood that rule, I'll change my action.