[Tattersail_]

Twelve could call in his votes on either Agenda too which could be crucial to where the agendas go.

[Khellendros]

Tattersail_, on 13 September 2018 - 03:34 PM, said:

Given the mood on the table at the moment, I think, Gnaw, IH and Morgoth are all anti D'rek

That is 31 votes if I ask Morgoth for the votes on crown.


Nom is mainly absent so hasn't created much of a bond with anyone. However, through personal gain he may want to see other leaders like Morgoth and IH suffer. The addded bonus is that he bumps up one place in strategy pick if IH is elected

Tapper is quiet and has his cards close to his chest. The strategy pick could influence him here but not sure if it is that major for him.

D'rek would probably like to see IH have the public execution as he has declared war on her.

37 votes between them if they agree with each other.

So 14 votes on Crown between you Khell, me and Morgoth should see you get it?

Morgoth has said previously that he would give me his votes for 3TGs. But then also I think Twelve might control some of his votes?

I think Nom will put all his votes on IH for public execution, as that would benefit him most.

[Khellendros]

I really can't make any deals till I know who's gonna be calling in what votes.

[Khellendros]

Really interesting dynamic with these two agendas. The outcome of public execution has more game-wide impact (and could also impact on me later on down the line), but the Crown one has more immediate individual significance.

[Khellendros]

Likely D'rek voters (IH, Gnaw): 23 votes.
Likely IH voters (D'rek, Nom): 25 votes.

[Tattersail_]

Khellendros, on 13 September 2018 - 03:37 PM, said:

Tattersail_, on 13 September 2018 - 03:34 PM, said:

Given the mood on the table at the moment, I think, Gnaw, IH and Morgoth are all anti D'rek

That is 31 votes if I ask Morgoth for the votes on crown.


Nom is mainly absent so hasn't created much of a bond with anyone. However, through personal gain he may want to see other leaders like Morgoth and IH suffer. The addded bonus is that he bumps up one place in strategy pick if IH is elected

Tapper is quiet and has his cards close to his chest. The strategy pick could influence him here but not sure if it is that major for him.

D'rek would probably like to see IH have the public execution as he has declared war on her.

37 votes between them if they agree with each other.

So 14 votes on Crown between you Khell, me and Morgoth should see you get it?

Morgoth has said previously that he would give me his votes for 3TGs. But then also I think Twelve might control some of his votes?

I think Nom will put all his votes on IH for public execution, as that would benefit him most.

That was when he needed the TG's to convert into CT's for the PO, he doesn't need them right now.

[Khellendros]

@ Galactic Council: What do you intend to do about Public Execution's 'cannot vote on next agenda' sentence, because we've been playing with them resolving simultaneously so far?

[Tattersail_]

Khellendros, on 13 September 2018 - 03:44 PM, said:

@ Galactic Council: What do you intend to do about Public Execution's 'cannot vote on next agenda' sentence, because we've been playing with them resolving simultaneously so far?

Normally one gets resolved and then the other, we normally just vote simultaneously. It's a good question though, I assume, all votes will go in, but the nominated person, who is executed, their votes will be forfeit on the second agenda.

[Tattersail_]

Although to be fair Khell, I assume that persons votes will be going all in in the first agenda anyway.

[Khellendros]

Tattersail_, on 13 September 2018 - 03:48 PM, said:

Although to be fair Khell, I assume that persons votes will be going all in in the first agenda anyway.

Not if IH indeed does control one of D'rek's votes. Am I imagining that?

[Tattersail_]

Khellendros, on 13 September 2018 - 03:53 PM, said:

Tattersail_, on 13 September 2018 - 03:48 PM, said:

Although to be fair Khell, I assume that persons votes will be going all in in the first agenda anyway.

Not if IH indeed does control one of D'rek's votes. Am I imagining that?

I doubt she'd execute herself.

[Khellendros]

Tattersail_, on 13 September 2018 - 03:54 PM, said:

Khellendros, on 13 September 2018 - 03:53 PM, said:

Tattersail_, on 13 September 2018 - 03:48 PM, said:

Although to be fair Khell, I assume that persons votes will be going all in in the first agenda anyway.

Not if IH indeed does control one of D'rek's votes. Am I imagining that?

I doubt she'd execute herself.

Well it depends. Does she think she has no option if IH says, 'place one vote on yourself?' Then she couldn't place votes elsewhere on the same agenda. Or would she just ignore him? Or am I making up the whole thing and there is no deal?

[Khellendros]

Have you actually agreed on that deal, Tatts?

[Tattersail_]

Khellendros, on 13 September 2018 - 04:04 PM, said:

Have you actually agreed on that deal, Tatts?

With Twelve? Yes

[twelve]

I'm only calling in votes if someone offers to buy them. So far I've got no takers.

[Galactic Council]

Tattersail_, on 13 September 2018 - 03:47 PM, said:

Khellendros, on 13 September 2018 - 03:44 PM, said:

@ Galactic Council: What do you intend to do about Public Execution's 'cannot vote on next agenda' sentence, because we've been playing with them resolving simultaneously so far?

Normally one gets resolved and then the other, we normally just vote simultaneously. It's a good question though, I assume, all votes will go in, but the nominated person, who is executed, their votes will be forfeit on the second agenda.

Agreed.

[Khellendros]

twelve, on 13 September 2018 - 04:22 PM, said:

I'm only calling in votes if someone offers to buy them. So far I've got no takers.

What votes do you have?

[twelve]

Ih, morgoth, nom, drek and Tatts all owe me votes. Tapper is the only one I've used.

[twelve]

I think they all owe me 4 votes each.

[Khellendros]

twelve, on 13 September 2018 - 05:19 PM, said:

I think they all owe me 4 votes each.

So what would you want for them? Bearing in mind I have little to give. Might be better for me just to make individual deals with one big hitter.