Malazan Empire: Twilight Imperium (II) - Chatty Thread - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 292 Pages +
  • « First
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Twilight Imperium (II) - Chatty Thread

#1221 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 24 July 2018 - 11:01 PM

Thanks - looking into it now!
0

#1222 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 24 July 2018 - 11:06 PM

I hadn't updated IH's last post properly when I added the extra info - so that's updated now and matches the map.

For Twelve I just hadn't been removing tokens as I should - his last status update is correct. I am updating the map now.
0

#1223 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 24 July 2018 - 11:08 PM

Game map has been updated.
0

#1224 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,165
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 24 July 2018 - 11:19 PM

Tappers fighter still shows he has the warfare boost on it.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

#1225 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 24 July 2018 - 11:22 PM

View Posttwelve, on 24 July 2018 - 11:19 PM, said:

Tappers fighter still shows he has the warfare boost on it.



Bah!

Thanks, will add it to the next update!
0

#1226 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 24 July 2018 - 11:45 PM

ItWasBliss - has Morgoth agreed to the exchange of SftT PNs somewhere?
0

#1227 User is offline   Gnaw 

  • Recovering eating disordered addict of HHM
  • View gallery
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 5,966
  • Joined: 16-June 12

Posted 24 July 2018 - 11:59 PM

View PostGalactic Council, on 24 July 2018 - 11:45 PM, said:

ItWasBliss - has Morgoth agreed to the exchange of SftT PNs somewhere?


Yeah it's back there somewhere.

The trees are afraid of the pirates. Something about being afraid they’ll be turned into post pillaging bonfires.

This post has been edited by Gnaw: 25 July 2018 - 12:00 AM

"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
0

#1228 User is offline   Morgoth 

  • executor emeritus
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 11,448
  • Joined: 24-January 03
  • Location:the void

Posted 25 July 2018 - 12:58 AM

View PostImperial Historian, on 24 July 2018 - 04:36 PM, said:

Morgoth now we are neighbours do you want to exchange support for the throne or ceasefire PNs (or both?)?

Anyone interested in my racial PN now I've got it back?


I can be amendable to an exchange of the ceasefire PN. Also, now that we are neighbours I’ll be happy to do future commodity trades with you and nom.
Take good care to keep relations civil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
0

#1229 User is offline   Gnaw 

  • Recovering eating disordered addict of HHM
  • View gallery
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 5,966
  • Joined: 16-June 12

Posted 25 July 2018 - 03:36 AM

Hello other lurker. ;)
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
0

#1230 User is offline   D'rek 

  • Consort of High House Mafia
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 14,611
  • Joined: 08-August 07
  • Location::

Posted 25 July 2018 - 03:54 AM

View PostD, on 24 July 2018 - 10:20 PM, said:

I believe that if I have no CTs in strategy you still get one, but will need to double-check. That sounds like a good deal to me, but as you say have to wait until we're neighbours / an agenda phase.


re^^

The most common consensus on boardgamegeek and other forums, and I agree with it, is:

The L1z1x, Xxcha, and Muaat racial Promissory Notes can only be used if those races still have a strategy token available to be spent. (Which aligns with rule 1.5: "When a player
resolves an ability, he must resolve the ability in its entirety.")

The Sol is different - their racial PN explicitly says "Remove 1 token from the Sol player's strategy pool, if able".

The Barony of Letnev's racial PN, which forces the Barony to lost 2 trade goods (or 1 if they only have 1), also can still be resolved even if the Barony has no TG due to the way it is written - on it the effects are broken into different paragraphs making them independent effects to resolve. (As per Rule 1.7)

View Postworrywort, on 14 September 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:

I kinda love it when D'rek unleashes her nerd wrath, as I knew she would here. Sorry innocent bystanders, but someone's gotta be the kindling.
0

#1231 User is offline   Gnaw 

  • Recovering eating disordered addict of HHM
  • View gallery
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 5,966
  • Joined: 16-June 12

Posted 25 July 2018 - 07:24 AM

Your turn IH.
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
0

#1232 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,260
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 25 July 2018 - 07:56 AM

IH looking at that move do you have plans for Mansa 3 next round for the PO? I'd prefer not to fight this early so maybe we can come to some sort of arrangement?
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

#1233 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 25 July 2018 - 08:35 AM

View PostTattersail_, on 25 July 2018 - 07:56 AM, said:

IH looking at that move do you have plans for Mansa 3 next round for the PO? I'd prefer not to fight this early so maybe we can come to some sort of arrangement?


An arrangement for mansa 3 would be good. What do you want for it? I'd only need it for a round.
0

#1234 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 25 July 2018 - 08:36 AM

View PostMorgoth, on 25 July 2018 - 12:58 AM, said:

View PostImperial Historian, on 24 July 2018 - 04:36 PM, said:

Morgoth now we are neighbours do you want to exchange support for the throne or ceasefire PNs (or both?)?

Anyone interested in my racial PN now I've got it back?


I can be amendable to an exchange of the ceasefire PN. Also, now that we are neighbours I’ll be happy to do future commodity trades with you and nom.


Done. Do you have an interest in my wormhole PN?
0

#1235 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 25 July 2018 - 08:36 AM

View PostD, on 25 July 2018 - 03:54 AM, said:

View PostD, on 24 July 2018 - 10:20 PM, said:

I believe that if I have no CTs in strategy you still get one, but will need to double-check. That sounds like a good deal to me, but as you say have to wait until we're neighbours / an agenda phase.


re^^

The most common consensus on boardgamegeek and other forums, and I agree with it, is:

The L1z1x, Xxcha, and Muaat racial Promissory Notes can only be used if those races still have a strategy token available to be spent. (Which aligns with rule 1.5: "When a player
resolves an ability, he must resolve the ability in its entirety.")

The Sol is different - their racial PN explicitly says "Remove 1 token from the Sol player's strategy pool, if able".

The Barony of Letnev's racial PN, which forces the Barony to lost 2 trade goods (or 1 if they only have 1), also can still be resolved even if the Barony has no TG due to the way it is written - on it the effects are broken into different paragraphs making them independent effects to resolve. (As per Rule 1.7)


Makes sense. Would you still be interested in a trade?
0

#1236 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,260
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 25 July 2018 - 08:42 AM

View PostImperial Historian, on 25 July 2018 - 08:35 AM, said:

View PostTattersail_, on 25 July 2018 - 07:56 AM, said:

IH looking at that move do you have plans for Mansa 3 next round for the PO? I'd prefer not to fight this early so maybe we can come to some sort of arrangement?


An arrangement for mansa 3 would be good. What do you want for it? I'd only need it for a round.


3tg's to move everything out completely, and if you get Leaderships to play that first turn. So you'd play leadership and pay me 3TG's and first turn i'll move my ships into Abyz/Fria.

edit, it doesn't have to be first turn, but I wouldn't be able to move them without you playing that and paying me the CT's to do it, as I have my own plans elsewhere.

This post has been edited by Tattersail_: 25 July 2018 - 08:44 AM

Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

#1237 User is offline   Morgoth 

  • executor emeritus
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 11,448
  • Joined: 24-January 03
  • Location:the void

Posted 25 July 2018 - 11:00 AM

IH I am happy to exchange ceasefire, but I need a promise that you’ll move that destroyer when I need you too. Though that’s definitly no this next round.
Take good care to keep relations civil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
0

#1238 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 25 July 2018 - 11:27 AM

View PostMorgoth, on 25 July 2018 - 11:00 AM, said:

IH I am happy to exchange ceasefire, but I need a promise that you’ll move that destroyer when I need you too. Though that’s definitly no this next round.


Not a problem, I intended to move it soon anyway. I can leave it where it is if you want.
0

#1239 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 25 July 2018 - 11:35 AM

View PostTattersail_, on 25 July 2018 - 08:42 AM, said:

View PostImperial Historian, on 25 July 2018 - 08:35 AM, said:

View PostTattersail_, on 25 July 2018 - 07:56 AM, said:

IH looking at that move do you have plans for Mansa 3 next round for the PO? I'd prefer not to fight this early so maybe we can come to some sort of arrangement?


An arrangement for mansa 3 would be good. What do you want for it? I'd only need it for a round.


3tg's to move everything out completely, and if you get Leaderships to play that first turn. So you'd play leadership and pay me 3TG's and first turn i'll move my ships into Abyz/Fria.

edit, it doesn't have to be first turn, but I wouldn't be able to move them without you playing that and paying me the CT's to do it, as I have my own plans elsewhere.


I do not have 3TG. I could potentially trade you twelve's trade PN. Is this to occupy mansa permanently?
0

#1240 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,260
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 25 July 2018 - 11:48 AM

View PostImperial Historian, on 25 July 2018 - 11:35 AM, said:

View PostTattersail_, on 25 July 2018 - 08:42 AM, said:

View PostImperial Historian, on 25 July 2018 - 08:35 AM, said:

View PostTattersail_, on 25 July 2018 - 07:56 AM, said:

IH looking at that move do you have plans for Mansa 3 next round for the PO? I'd prefer not to fight this early so maybe we can come to some sort of arrangement?


An arrangement for mansa 3 would be good. What do you want for it? I'd only need it for a round.


3tg's to move everything out completely, and if you get Leaderships to play that first turn. So you'd play leadership and pay me 3TG's and first turn i'll move my ships into Abyz/Fria.

edit, it doesn't have to be first turn, but I wouldn't be able to move them without you playing that and paying me the CT's to do it, as I have my own plans elsewhere.


I do not have 3TG. I could potentially trade you twelve's trade PN. Is this to occupy mansa permanently?


You said you'd only need it for the one round.

How about your trade PN with promise of refresh and you'll get 1 TG back when I use it?

I know you're better at making deals than me, you did well the last time we traded. The cost to move would be 3 Tg's next round at some point, is that better?
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

Share this topic:


  • 292 Pages +
  • « First
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users