[D'rek]

Gnaw, on 09 August 2018 - 07:54 PM, said:

Tatts, are you going to quash one of those?

Are you?

[Gnaw]

D, on 09 August 2018 - 07:56 PM, said:

Gnaw, on 09 August 2018 - 07:54 PM, said:

Tatts, are you going to quash one of those?

Are you?

Nope. And missed Tatts’ post. So neither is going away due to Quash.

[D'rek]

I doubt someone will Veto them either, so that's our 2 agendas then!

I'm not amiss to having them, but I don't think they'll do that much for me, either, so my votes are for sale - wholesale or in parts. Make me an offer!

The only thing I won't vote for is Ixth to Saar. Nothing personal and not even a worry of the current game-state, it's just that Floating Factories mesh too well with keeping up the Prophecy of Ixth condition.

[Tattersail_]

I'll give you my pro biomes the next two rounds to have your votes for the fighter one, not that I'm building much fighters it'd be nice to have some military gain.

[D'rek]

Tattersail_, on 09 August 2018 - 08:05 PM, said:

I'll give you my pro biomes the next two rounds to have your votes for the fighter one, not that I'm building much fighters it'd be nice to have some military gain.

You already said earlier you were going to biomes me, so you'd be retracting that in order to offer it to me...?

[Tattersail_]

D, on 09 August 2018 - 08:06 PM, said:

Tattersail_, on 09 August 2018 - 08:05 PM, said:

I'll give you my pro biomes the next two rounds to have your votes for the fighter one, not that I'm building much fighters it'd be nice to have some military gain.

You already said earlier you were going to biomes me, so you'd be retracting that in order to offer it to me...?

No, I'm just hoping for some good faith. I'm not bothered either way to be honest. If you feel generous then that's great

[Gnaw]

D, on 09 August 2018 - 08:03 PM, said:

I doubt someone will Veto them either, so that's our 2 agendas then!

I'm not amiss to having them, but I don't think they'll do that much for me, either, so my votes are for sale - wholesale or in parts. Make me an offer!

The only thing I won't vote for is Ixth to Saar. Nothing personal and not even a worry of the current game-state, it's just that Floating Factories mesh too well with keeping up the Prophecy of Ixth condition.

Agree on that agenda. Anyone but the Saar.

[Imperial Historian]

I'd be happy with either or my votes are for sale.

I won't vote for Saar on either agenda because either combination would be dangerous.

Also will be trying to stop d'rek getting the construction one as I think it meshes with her take over docks ability, so she could potentially take someone's major production centre, take there docks and then get a free build horriffic!

[D'rek]

Tattersail_, on 09 August 2018 - 08:09 PM, said:

D, on 09 August 2018 - 08:06 PM, said:

Tattersail_, on 09 August 2018 - 08:05 PM, said:

I'll give you my pro biomes the next two rounds to have your votes for the fighter one, not that I'm building much fighters it'd be nice to have some military gain.

You already said earlier you were going to biomes me, so you'd be retracting that in order to offer it to me...?

No, I'm just hoping for some good faith. I'm not bothered either way to be honest. If you feel generous then that's great

If I have some leftover votes I'll throw them your way, sure, but all 14 of them just as good faith on a prior point seems like a waste, no offense

[D'rek]

Imperial Historian, on 09 August 2018 - 08:11 PM, said:

Also will be trying to stop d'rek getting the construction one as I think it meshes with her take over docks ability, so she could potentially take someone's major production centre, take there docks and then get a free build horriffic!

I'll give ya 10 votes on it in exchange for your Trade PN. Then I definitely can't end up elected for it

[Gnaw]

Imperial Historian, on 09 August 2018 - 08:11 PM, said:

I'd be happy with either or my votes are for sale.

I won't vote for Saar on either agenda because either combination would be dangerous.

Also will be trying to stop d'rek getting the construction one as I think it meshes with her take over docks ability, so she could potentially take someone's major production centre, take there docks and then get a free build horriffic!

Oh. Yeah, that’s a good one for her to not get.

[twelve]

The safest thing for everyone would be for me to be elected for both. For everyone but Gnaw and Tatts The fighter one allows me to hold out longer which means they are more hampered which helps everyone else out. And as I'm unlikely to move out of my small corner of the galaxy I'll be unlikely to build future space docks so no sudden troops popping up on anyone's border.

[Gnaw]

twelve, on 09 August 2018 - 09:14 PM, said:

The safest thing for everyone would be for me to be elected for both. For everyone but Gnaw and Tatts The fighter one allows me to hold out longer which means they are more hampered which helps everyone else out. And as I'm unlikely to move out of my small corner of the galaxy I'll be unlikely to build future space docks so no sudden troops popping up on anyone's border.

I’m copacetic with this.

[twelve]

Seriously? Did not expect that kind of response.

[D'rek]

What does copacetic mean?

[twelve]

More or less in agreement or fine with or something along those lines

This post has been edited by twelve: 10 August 2018 - 01:00 AM

[Gnaw]

D, on 10 August 2018 - 12:28 AM, said:

What does copacetic mean?

Google is your friend.

[D'rek]

Gnaw, on 10 August 2018 - 01:49 AM, said:

D, on 10 August 2018 - 12:28 AM, said:

What does copacetic mean?

Google is your friend.

Google is a drunken gossip friend

[Galactic Council]

Loving Twelve's 32 CT gain in his Status post. Almost wanna give it to him!

[twelve]

When do I get my action card?