D, on 27 July 2018 - 08:07 PM, said:
Khellendros, on 27 July 2018 - 07:19 PM, said:
Could have used what on Silvano? Used LOGISTICS on it.
Could have taken Imperial rather than Logistics, my two choices? No thanks

I've provided
You can play all high and mighty and wounded indignant all you like, but you tried to attack me, and now you're sore about the consequences. Well boo hoo. Oh, hardly. I knew the "consequences". Except that we both know they were coming either way, so I have no regrets about trying (and failing) to mitigate them. It's not indignation at being attacked, it's scorn at your mewly pretensions. I don't see why you can't just own up to your intentions instead of this charade of "I was driving my truck at full speed towards you, how dare you try to slow me down, you gave me no choice but to hit you!".
How can I use Logistics on Silvano when I can't even activate it until Nom moves off it, which he did after turn 2, the point at which our deal required me to use Logistics? At least try not to ignore entire parts of things I have already said.
Logistics was still useful for me because it provided me with an extra CT for future use. I started this round with only 1 token in tactical and strategy.
At least now we know how you would have handled a buildup of armaments during the Cold War. Pre-emptive kablooie. Negotiating with Nom to move through Lodor. Placing a wormhole in the asteroid field on the opposite side of the map to you. The current objectives all being away from you. If that all points to me coming for you then you might want to consider that actually you're the one with the hawkish policy. Not that you will. Oh and I probably lied in a PM to Blend for...reasons? too.
Whatever then.