D, on 11 July 2018 - 02:12 PM, said:
Tapper, been thinking about it some more. So, I think the only option of putting planets in #21 would be Tequ'ran/Torkan (a 2/0 planet and a 0/3 planet, really good system). But trading away that for Arnor/Lor, which isn't as good, seems like a net loss. Thoughts?
Hmm. Let's put it this way.
If IH puts the Supernova at 22 we are essentially fully seperated if I put an empty hex at #9.
In addition to no threat at #9 and by extension at #2 (if #22 is blocked by Supernova), #23 is also solidly yours. Granting a slightly better system to me than I do to you is then of no consequence and might even be prudent, if only to make sure Khell does not steamroll over me and eyes you next.
If we do border at 22/23, that opens up trade opportunities.
A 1:1 or 2:2 trade could benefit us both, I would be willing to make that 2:1 or 3:2 for up to 3 rounds to compensate. By then we're solidly in mid-game and the table could look entirely different.
If you don't fancy a Trade agreement but rather a planetary arrangement, then I could switch Nevant to #9 and the empty hex to #27.
In that case, I'd be happy for you to control Nevant at #9 - if it is DMZ'ed and you won't move on #8.
In both variants, the additional resources you receive more than make up for TT, imho.
It's Red tech seems not exactly your cup of tea, unless you want to go RRRY for the Armor and War Suns (in which case YY and your racial is still faster).