Jalan, on 10 May 2017 - 08:45 PM, said:
Rashan, on 10 May 2017 - 08:35 PM, said:
Jalan, on 10 May 2017 - 08:29 PM, said:
Ampelas, on 10 May 2017 - 08:19 PM, said:
Rashan, on 10 May 2017 - 06:56 PM, said:
What bothers me in your answer is really this: "what would my answer change?"
SR made a case on Kilava being "wishy-washy" and "too smooth" ™
I suggested I wasn't seeing that, but I'd do a re-read.
You were voting kilava at the time. Along with SR.
You claim you were willing to hammer SR. What would me coming back an hour before timeout and saying "look, I totally see why you think Kilava is scum!" would change at that point? Your response suggests you'd then try to turn the lynch off SR and onto Kilava.
Given the CF, that scenario raises almost as many questions as Galain's behaviour.
I was going for my typical thought process, that killers play middle of the road, stay out of trouble by being overall agreeable without having to commit anything. I saw Kilava as fitting the bill and stood by my case.
I am not sure what else to say? I brought up SR and Denul first thing, looking at both as symps. I then proceeded to search for someone not rocking the boat but not drawing attention as a low poster. If you know who I am, this is my MO.
This is actually what is stopping me from placing a vote on you. I don't think you'd be stupid enough to be the only other one on a train with a partner if you were a killer.
And what about Galain? What's the likelihood of "it's too blatant to be true" defense applying to both?
Frankly, you could group my hammer into that clusterfuck as well.
The fact is that we're looking for 2 scum left in a group of 8 people. All 3 of us can't be scum.
Now, I'm going to pull a bit of meta here, but
Nom has a tendency to like hiding messages to his partners in his posts. I'm hopping back to dig over his previous materials to see if he did it again with his symp. I think that's our best chance of finding our next member of that infamous trio.
Find any hidden messages from Nom? Probably not, since it would be far easier to just communicate uncryptically with his partner privately. You know, normal Scum channels.
Galain, on 11 May 2017 - 09:27 AM, said:
Jalan, on 10 May 2017 - 01:39 AM, said:
Silchas Ruin, on 09 May 2017 - 02:43 PM, said:
For the record I have never seen whatever movie it was and I don't remember it from the SImpsons, I know it from a song (where it's not "the loneliest")
remove vote
I don't get Nim's vote on Galain but I don't think me questioning everything Nimander does and I don't get leads anywhere or is much helpful so I'll just leave Nimander be
I need to reread the but it seems like Kilava has managed to stay relatively low despite not being low-poster. Denul's non-commitment warrants attention but his play has not been that much different from mine so they're not that supicious to me.
Galain, Rashan and Ampelas are all serious and sensible, maybe that's not such a bad place to look too. But I admit they all make sense in some way, but Ampelas is giving me the most tryhard feeling of them.
I like Galain's vote on Osserc, although as Rashan points out they have too little posts for my liking, would like to hear more from them.
Yeah, the more I'm reading the more likely I find that SR is scum.
The way he continues to take little jabs are Nim to attempt to discredit a non-cc'ed healer is rather worrisome. I think the only non-scum possibility to explain his behavior is if he is the actual healer, but I don't think that's the case.
Beyond that though, SR is on thread a lot, attempting to direct the discussion. That makes me really nervous.
Vote Silchas Ruin
This post is scummy as fuck. Where do I start with it. Before this game "non-cc'ed" was not a common phrase. It was, and I'll be bold to say this, never used in mafia on this site. Counter would be the usual term. This use of the phrase in Jalan's post has me thinking that they have been following the thread a lot more carefully than their absence portrays.
The next thing is, the use of counter claim as a viable excuse for berating SR's vote because not everyone had checked in. Ampelas and Jalan himself were non entities at the beginning of the game. So their still could have been a counter at any stage until everyone had checked in.
The whole post smacks of someone who wants to be on this train and is just reiterating what others have said instead of giving their own proper thoughts.
That is the particular Jalan post that triggered my hypothetical Jalan/Silchas convo post at the end of Day one even before the resolve proved that Silchas was Scum. Granted, Osserc as NK doesn't make a whole lot of sense in the theoretical context of Jalan being Scum, but he's still my #1 Suspect.
Galain, on 11 May 2017 - 11:06 AM, said:
Nimander Golit, on 11 May 2017 - 10:58 AM, said:
Galain, on 11 May 2017 - 09:30 AM, said:
So in conclusion after my read up I have Merrid as my top suspect and Jalan as a close second.
That post I quoted with Denul quoting both Silchas and Merrid has me thinking he is the symp. He also never voted for SR.
Vote Merrid
Get off Merrid.
The symp wouldn't be so sloppy as to quote both killers in the same post.
Also, I disagree with your read on him.
This I am afraid has happened a shit ton of times on this forum.
Kruppe himself is definitely a player I can see doing that too.
LOL! Kruppe in general or Kruppe when Symp? If in general, then I likely wouldn't know I was quoting two Scum, would I? And if when Symp, then you can easily find an example to show us should there be one, because I have been Symp here exactly ONCE (a game Scum won, btw
)
Meanwhile, I'm going to go ahead and
Vote Jalan
Help
sigh. 
