Malazan Empire: MAFIA 138-RETURN OF DEATH NOTE MAFIA - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 27 Pages +
  • « First
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

MAFIA 138-RETURN OF DEATH NOTE MAFIA

#101 User is offline   Pallid 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 28 December 2016 - 06:37 PM

View PostGamelon, on 28 December 2016 - 06:21 PM, said:

I did not post anything after the read through as there really wasn't anything that caught my eye except TS


This adds to Fanderay's concerns about you Gamelon. Nothing caught your eye? I find that hard to believe but say I was to believe you, what do you mean by "except TS"? What stood out about him?

#102 User is offline   Fanderay 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 28 December 2016 - 06:39 PM

View PostGamelon, on 28 December 2016 - 06:21 PM, said:

I did not post anything after the read through as there really wasn't anything that caught my eye except TS


I find that hard to believe - there's always something to go on. Hell, earlier in the day you said:

View PostGamelon, on 27 December 2016 - 04:23 PM, said:

Hmm. Interesting little byplay going on.

Mockra immediately pinning the symp label on Fanderay stinks. But then again this is Day 1.

I have no clue what Pallid is upto

So clearly you are capable of finding interesting stuff in the thread. But you aren't willing to try and synthesize that into an opinion strong enough to put a vote on. Je ne l'aime pas.

EDIT: X-post with Pallid.

This post has been edited by Fanderay: 28 December 2016 - 06:39 PM


#103 User is offline   Aparal Forge 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 28 December 2016 - 06:49 PM

ok I'm finally back and reading up.

#104 User is offline   Aparal Forge 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 28 December 2016 - 06:50 PM

View PostBek Okhan, on 26 December 2016 - 10:14 PM, said:

*I'm kind of around, but playing tech support to all the new gadgetry my family bought for the holidays, so not really*


Yes... we just had a computer crisis this morning.

#105 User is offline   Aparal Forge 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 28 December 2016 - 06:53 PM

View PostPallid, on 27 December 2016 - 12:37 PM, said:

vote tulas shorn

Because he wants me to.


This reeks of signaling.

#106 User is offline   Aparal Forge 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 28 December 2016 - 06:56 PM

View PostPallid, on 27 December 2016 - 06:07 PM, said:

View PostTulas Shorn, on 25 December 2016 - 08:58 PM, said:

I exist, and now I hope to see some others in here soon.

Hmm, should I start trying to speculate on roles to see how fast I get lynched? :apt:


No real reason for pickung Tulas out of the hat except I slightly didn't like the question.

It's like he is daring us to vote for him. So I obliged.


I see your point from past games.

#107 User is offline   Aparal Forge 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 28 December 2016 - 06:58 PM

View PostBek Okhan, on 27 December 2016 - 11:12 PM, said:

vote Serc




because of all the joke votes that one makes the least sense.


And Alkend's vote on Serc didn't bother you?

#108 User is offline   Aparal Forge 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 28 December 2016 - 07:04 PM

View PostMockra, on 28 December 2016 - 12:35 PM, said:

TS does sound weird, but I think he is just a townie who has confused the "It's fine if you die as town" with "Roll over and die if you are targeted as town".

I find it sad and rather offensive that people think I made a "case" against Fanderay. He was being annoying and I tried to shut him up. The least I do while making a case is vote for the idiot I'm accusing.

I'm not sure who to vote for right now. On one hand, Pallid suddenly voted for AP and left their vote there for some reason. On the other hand, there are two votes on Serc and one vote on Alkend (I think) because of early day jokes. Since I wouldn't be able to check the thread before the day ends, these are the choices I have:

Pallid (0): Unexplained vote. Has five posts. One of them is his check in. One of them is a joke vote on TS. Another one explains the joke reasoning for his TS vote. The fourth is an unexplained vote for AP and the fifth doesn't say anything useful at all.

Aparal Forge(1): He already has a vote on him and we need a lynch. I don't think this is good enough. Although he is the second lowest poster in the game and that makes me want to kill him.

Alkend(1): Only has two posts. One of them is the regular hail and the other one is a joke vote on Serc. Again a low poster that I would be totally support a lynch on under normal day1 circumstances.

Serc(2): His first post is a joke vote, his second post is a joke. The third joke is something meta (which is against the rules btw), the fourth is another joke (actually I just realized he also has a "hello" post on the first page). One Alkend vote and another BO vote. The Alkend vote is a joke and the BO vote is based on gut because his humor(?) is unnatural.

Fanderay(0): He is annoying.

I would be fine voting 2-5 under normal circumstances. However, the weird and tbh, rather suspicious behavior of Pallid cannot and should not be ignored.

Vote Pallid

I will try to be back around day end, but no guarantees.


Well SORRY for not having posted much yet. We do have 48 hour days so I took my time getting back.

#109 User is offline   Pallid 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 28 December 2016 - 07:08 PM

vote gamelon

I like what Fanderay had to say about them and their latest post aggravates me. Possible scum for sure.

#110 User is offline   Aparal Forge 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 28 December 2016 - 07:11 PM

View PostPallid, on 28 December 2016 - 07:08 PM, said:

vote gamelon

I like what Fanderay had to say about them and their latest post aggravates me. Possible scum for sure.


Is there anyone you haven't voted for yet?

#111 User is offline   Pallid 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 28 December 2016 - 07:12 PM

About 7 others I think 😁😀😂😃

#112 User is offline   Aparal Forge 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 28 December 2016 - 07:23 PM

So WTF?!

Pallid votes Tulas
Serc votes Pallid
Alkend votes Serc
Pallid votes AP (me)
Hanas joke votes Tulas and removes
Bek votes Serc
Fanderay votes Alkend
Mockra votes Pallid
Fanderay votes Gamelon
Pallid votes
Ultama votes Tulas
Tulas crybaby votes self
Pallid votes Gamelon

So my initial thought is that Pallid was signaling to Tulas, and TS's partner Serc or Alkend? Immediately reacted. Not sure what to make of the self-vote, but that could be trying to distance from his partner.

Anywhoo...

vote Tulas

#113 User is offline   Fanderay 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 28 December 2016 - 07:34 PM

Nice of you to join us, AF. So can you break down the sequence of events you think happened here a bit more? Are you saying that you think Serc and TS are partnered and Serc reacted to Pallid's vote with an immediate OMGUS by proxy? I'm not quite seeing where the Alkend-as-possible-partner comes from.

#114 User is offline   Alkend 

  • Lieutenant
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 110
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 28 December 2016 - 07:44 PM

I don't find Tulas all that suspicious, I don't really get the case on him. I read his play as town.

remove vote

it was a nothing.

rereading again now to pick a proper vote

#115 User is offline   Aparal Forge 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 28 December 2016 - 07:55 PM

View PostFanderay, on 28 December 2016 - 07:34 PM, said:

Nice of you to join us, AF. So can you break down the sequence of events you think happened here a bit more? Are you saying that you think Serc and TS are partnered and Serc reacted to Pallid's vote with an immediate OMGUS by proxy? I'm not quite seeing where the Alkend-as-possible-partner comes from.

Well, i DID, but if it helps...

Pallid signals TS with a joke. Either Serc or Alkend's vote looks like a reaction to TS getting notice. Pallid removes and tries to make it look like his TS vote wasnt anything special.

TS realizes he's drawn too much heat too early, and moves to sacrifice himself for team scum, but lets hi self be talmed off the ledge.

#116 User is offline   Aparal Forge 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 28 December 2016 - 07:58 PM

sorry about typos, trying to use a new tablet.

#117 User is offline   Hanas 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 28 December 2016 - 07:59 PM

View PostTulas Shorn, on 28 December 2016 - 05:39 PM, said:

So apparently I'm having tone issues again. That's ok. Like I said earlier, I'd rather live to play longer but my lynch will provide answers to town and close the case on me. I don't want that haunting town into day 2, because it will end up circling back to that.

vote Tulas


Is this a fucking joke? Answers to what precisely? That Pallid's vague suspicions about you being protected by Mockra even though you had no votes at yourself are wrong? Well what a worthy fucking trade! Hope you're at least roled so it's not so enormously unfair to scum. This can't be real, for fucks sake.
By creating this muddy shit you're now just drawing everyone's attention so that they can tell what a bs play this is. I'm aware what a crap labeling people symps at this point is but this kind of shit again can't be town play. But god knows I wouldn't bother typing this if I didn't think he's town.

#118 User is offline   Fanderay 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 28 December 2016 - 08:04 PM

View PostAparal Forge, on 28 December 2016 - 07:55 PM, said:

Well, i DID, but if it helps...

Pallid signals TS with a joke. Either Serc or Alkend's vote looks like a reaction to TS getting notice. Pallid removes and tries to make it look like his TS vote wasnt anything special.

TS realizes he's drawn too much heat too early, and moves to sacrifice himself for team scum, but lets hi self be talmed off the ledge.

OK, thanks. It feels much more likely to me that if a scum team see an early vote on one of the pair that they'd try and distance rather than leaping to the others' defence like that, so I'm not sure I buy your argument.

Do you have any opinions about the rest of the players? As a low poster up to this point it would be good to know more about how you feel about the game.

#119 User is offline   Hanas 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 28 December 2016 - 08:08 PM

View PostAparal Forge, on 28 December 2016 - 07:55 PM, said:

View PostFanderay, on 28 December 2016 - 07:34 PM, said:

Nice of you to join us, AF. So can you break down the sequence of events you think happened here a bit more? Are you saying that you think Serc and TS are partnered and Serc reacted to Pallid's vote with an immediate OMGUS by proxy? I'm not quite seeing where the Alkend-as-possible-partner comes from.

Well, i DID, but if it helps...

Pallid signals TS with a joke. Either Serc or Alkend's vote looks like a reaction to TS getting notice. Pallid removes and tries to make it look like his TS vote wasnt anything special.

TS realizes he's drawn too much heat too early, and moves to sacrifice himself for team scum, but lets hi self be talmed off the ledge.


That's too much assumptions to base a D1 case on, and how would his sacrifice help scum anyway?

#120 User is offline   Aparal Forge 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 28 December 2016 - 08:10 PM

View PostFanderay, on 28 December 2016 - 08:04 PM, said:

View PostAparal Forge, on 28 December 2016 - 07:55 PM, said:

Well, i DID, but if it helps...

Pallid signals TS with a joke. Either Serc or Alkend's vote looks like a reaction to TS getting notice. Pallid removes and tries to make it look like his TS vote wasnt anything special.

TS realizes he's drawn too much heat too early, and moves to sacrifice himself for team scum, but lets hi self be talmed off the ledge.

OK, thanks. It feels much more likely to me that if a scum team see an early vote on one of the pair that they'd try and distance rather than leaping to the others' defence like that, so I'm not sure I buy your argument.

Do you have any opinions about the rest of the players? As a low poster up to this point it would be good to know more about how you feel about the game.

I haven't made up my mind yet on the rest of you. I'm not rea!ly feeling your Gamelon vote yet. You will notice that Alkend is now saying that he reads TS as town, which seems a bit early in the game to me.

Share this topic:


  • 27 Pages +
  • « First
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users