Itwæs Nom, on 26 October 2016 - 01:43 PM, said:
So, I'm here and willing to discuss the platonic love topic if you're willing to have me back my dear lover?
I'm for keeping this conversation going telling the other as much thoughts as you wish and we can check our logics based on last game conversation relatively easily
Ando does seem scummy to me but I think he always does. Yesterday I spent some time in chat with Blend and ansible, don't really ahve any thoughts based on that. Ansible looks to be trying to read a lot into player's posts and taking some jokes seriously, but he is the technicall kinda guy. Ment had been posting a lot yesterday but everyone has, and as I said said in the last game I find it hard to judge him on his posting itself, especially on day1 it doesn't tell me anything, would need to tie him to something. Sierg is posting little but he was in chat later yesterday and wasn't hesitant talking non-mafia topics(he wasn't hesitant talking mafia related ones either, they just weren't talked about when he came iirc). So yeah personally don't like Ando and Sierg atm. Ments loudness could mean town role too.
Itwæs Nom, on 26 October 2016 - 01:48 PM, said:
Tatts is asking lot of stupid questions, feels more fillery than last game so far
Khellendros, on 26 October 2016 - 01:49 PM, said:
I agree that those willing to talk the most are generally going to feature a bit lower on my scumdar...for now.
Amiable does seem to be playing the most serious thus far - afraid of joining in the shenanigans or a virtuous townie? As I made clear on thread, I like Blend for scum, but that's just a feeling.
You appear to be assuming I'm town talking to me like this, why would you do that my erstwhile sometime lover?
Itwæs Nom, on 26 October 2016 - 01:54 PM, said:
Because this day's a shitshow and I don't think my opinions and conclusions based on today won't matter that much to you if you were scum. This will help my trying to label you.
Blend's playful style is undoubtebly there, gonna check his last game
Itwæs Nom, on 26 October 2016 - 03:01 PM, said:
Yesterday I said something to Blend that his reaction to was a bit exagerrated imo, but there's no way I can remember more details
Itwæs Nom, on 26 October 2016 - 03:17 PM, said:
Aight Blend was acting weird in 133.75, he is not acting nowhere near that weird now and is fucking about way more
I don't wanna delv into this shitshow too much (as of yet), got other things to do
Khellendros, on 26 October 2016 - 04:42 PM, said:
I'm getting PMs from Tatts and Mess as well as you. Tatts is insisting that there's no way he would act this scattered as scum.
Mess is being his cool calculating self.
I don't think we're going to get anything concrete out of day 1, not intentionally anyway. Any positive result will be purely chance.
Itwæs Nom, on 26 October 2016 - 04:57 PM, said:
I don't think Tatts would insist there's no way he can be scum if he was scum because that's just plain nonsense and he'd be more careful if scum but who knows it's Tatts
Khellendros, on 26 October 2016 - 04:59 PM, said:
Itwæs Nom, on 26 October 2016 - 04:57 PM, said:
I don't think Tatts would insist there's no way he can be scum if he was scum because that's just plain nonsense and he'd be more careful if scum but who knows it's Tatts
Well all of last game he super insisted he wasn't scum and, uh, he wasn't. So...the same applies?
Itwæs Nom, on 26 October 2016 - 05:06 PM, said:
Allright I can get behind Blend's fun/serious switches as a reason better, and dismissing your vote as tongue in cheek is also weird and I don't like that he didn't want to answer to not look jumpy
Khellendros, on 26 October 2016 - 05:34 PM, said:
Itwæs Nom, on 26 October 2016 - 05:06 PM, said:
Allright I can get behind Blend's fun/serious switches as a reason better, and dismissing your vote as tongue in cheek is also weird and I don't like that he didn't want to answer to not look jumpy
I reserve the right to be 100% wrong, but it is genuinely the only thing thay really stands out to me. Blend putting all this effort in now could be a sign I'm wrong, and I'm tempted by Ment's argument on Kruppe. As I said, any decision today would be mostly just chance whether we hit scum or not.
Itwæs Nom, on 26 October 2016 - 06:22 PM, said:
Sierg has come to chat and apparently doesn't hide his lack of care about being absent on thread
Siergiej wild party here
Siergiej everyone sa talkative
7:50 PM
Siergiej ye, gonna need to drop a vote later on
Siergiej need to eat something first
makes me view him as a bit less scummy
Khellendros, on 26 October 2016 - 06:34 PM, said:
Or playing it cool, not seeing a need to contribute?
Itwæs Nom, on 26 October 2016 - 06:39 PM, said:
Khellendros, on 26 October 2016 - 06:34 PM, said:
Or playing it cool, not seeing a need to contribute?
Yeah and that's quite what he did when we were killers together but he appears to not give a fuck about looking like that's what he's doing
Itwæs Nom, on 26 October 2016 - 06:40 PM, said:
He's making a case, let's wait and see