[Anomandaris]

Fanderay, on 26 July 2016 - 06:49 PM, said:

Regardless, clearly I'm high on people lists which is convenient as from tomorrow evening I'm out of town and didn't fancy playing on my mobile and not really grasping what was going on as a result.

Lets get this over with and move on.

Remove Vote

Vote Fanderay

If I understand it right you're basically slef-voting because you would be inactive from tommorow? Why not just ask for modkill so we wouldn't have to waste a lynch on you, doesn't that counteract town's interests?

[Anomandaris]

No other lynch is happening and it seems we can't really lose anything with this one

I'm off and I don't wanna rely on Togg coming back in time

vote Fanderay

[Path-Shaper]

It is Day 3. 3 hours and 6 minutes remaining

9 Players still alive: Anomandaris, Aparal Forge, Demelain, Fanderay, Kadagar Fant, Merrid, Olar Ethil, Shadow, Togg

5 votes to lynch, 5 votes to go to night.

1 Vote for Merrid ( Kadagar Fant )
5 Votes for Fanderay ( Demelain, Olar Ethil, Aparal Forge, Fanderay, Anomandaris )

Players not voted: Merrid, Shadow, Togg


Fanderay has been lynched. He was Messremb and Jack Jones.

[Path-Shaper]

Night passes without incident.

It is Day 4. 35 hours and 59 minutes remaining

8 Players still alive: Anomandaris, Aparal Forge, Demelain, Kadagar Fant, Merrid, Olar Ethil, Shadow, Togg

5 votes to lynch, 4 votes to go to night.


Players not voted: Anomandaris, Aparal Forge, Demelain, Kadagar Fant, Merrid, Olar Ethil, Shadow, Togg

[Merrid]

Yeah, I didn't think it would be Fanderay.

[Shadow]

I don't know whether the killers decided not to make a move or if a town action was successful. I'm assuming the initial one from the lack of a scene.

[Olar Ethil]

So here is Togg. He has been bothering me a bit, but I didn't really get enough time to look at him.

Togg, on 20 July 2016 - 02:43 PM, said:

Kessobahn, on 19 July 2016 - 10:02 PM, said:

Checking in and out.

Kessobahn, on 20 July 2016 - 10:09 AM, said:

Aparal Forge, on 20 July 2016 - 08:00 AM, said:

Checking in.Has anyone seen my absinthe spoon?

I recall Togg and Fanderay looking for sodomizing tools...

Kessobahn, on 20 July 2016 - 02:28 PM, said:

Kadagar Fant, on 20 July 2016 - 12:57 PM, said:

Denul, on 20 July 2016 - 12:54 PM, said:

Kadagar Fant, on 20 July 2016 - 12:42 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on 20 July 2016 - 11:50 AM, said:

checking in.

Vote Emurlahnnot sure i like the nothingness.

Yes and how long does it take to read two pages of role playing.

Not long, but they are content to just join in with a nothing post and leave, skip day one possibly? Don't know, but we shouldn't let this slide.

Jumpy today, aren't we?

Kesso looks like he is laying low.

Togg, on 20 July 2016 - 03:00 PM, said:

Telas, on 20 July 2016 - 02:55 PM, said:

Merrid, on 20 July 2016 - 02:43 PM, said:

Togg, on 20 July 2016 - 02:39 PM, said:

Back. I agree with looking at coasters.

I disagree. Looking at coasters is really boring. I mean sure, nowadays you can get coasters with your own photos printed on them, and that's pretty cool, but even so, there's better things to spend your time looking at.

quote name='Merrid' timestamp='1469025837' post='1244119']

Togg, on 20 July 2016 - 02:39 PM, said:

Back. I agree with looking at coasters.

Of course you don't want us looking at coasters. Hmm... I wonder why? Could it possibly have something to with having two posts including the one trying to get people looking away from coasters? Vote Merrid

It sounds more like Merrid is trying to defend my bringing up Kesso.vote Kesso but I think Merrid looks squirrelly.

He starts the Kesso vote, again without any really solid reason. Note how he says he dislikes Merrid.

Togg, on 22 July 2016 - 04:25 PM, said:

It doesn't look like anyone else sees the Korlat or Merrid case. I'm not opposed to a Denul lynch, as I didn't like his reaction to the day 1 lynch either. His case on AF was out of left field. remove votevote Denul

He was on Korlat, yet never looked at Merrid though he apparently dislikes Merrid and frankly there was more on Merrid than Korlat. Also his vote on Denul was 5th on the train which would allow Scum to get some distancing in and avoid the scrutiny that a Hammer or an L 1 gets.

Togg, on 26 July 2016 - 05:37 PM, said:

On my lunch break so back for a few minutes. Without a counter-reveal, I'm inclined to believe Shadow. Fanderay is the only one that hasn't checked in since then, so I will most likely wait for him before I vote. Merrid has bothered me all game with his coasting.

Merrid, on 26 July 2016 - 05:27 AM, said:

Demelain, on 26 July 2016 - 03:48 AM, said:

Merrid, on 26 July 2016 - 01:35 AM, said:

Demelain, on 25 July 2016 - 07:12 PM, said:

My brain is melting. Exhaustion from weekend is cathing up, and this is a "lots of unpaid overtime" week. Merrid's last tirade is just... :doh:Fandy's look at Shadow is interesting. Although not sure I approve using Telas's kill as part of reasoning. Nevertheless, it's more interesting than his previous suggestion that me and Togg were directing the thread too much. I'll try to look at stuff in more detail tomorrow, but not in the morning. Beyond that, i'll be probably on very sporadically.

Are you sure you know what 'tirade' means?

Fine, allow me to correct myself:Merrid's latest apologetic whine was just.... :doh:Now, are you actually going to contribute something or, will you continue posting self-referential nothings?

Can nothing be self-referential?Also, I've neither apologised nor whined. Let's stick to the facts, yo.So Denul was scum, right? I suggest we, by which I mean, probably someone else, look at those who didn't interact with them on thread. I see there's a case on Shadow because of potential deflection. Possible. Not the way I would do it if I was scum, though. I would put the noose round Denul myself at the first sign of popular suspicion. I wouldn't bother defending or deflecting in the least. But on the other hand others just aren't as smart as me. As I have aptly demonstrated thus far.

This post was particularly cheeky, and I hate the idea of finding out at the end of the game that he's been laughing at us the whole time while he coasted to victory.If I vote Fanderay it will be for that 8th vote which smacks of trying too hard.

If Togg dislikes Merrid so much then why not vote for him, make a case or try to lynch him? A lot of Togg really just looks like somebody who is faking participation while actually coasting.

[Kadagar Fant]

Interesting, with the night one heal we had a scene were we could see this in effect, last night we did not have one, would we have had something if someone was guarded or not? Or did the killers refrain from killing what we suspect as our healer?

[Shadow]

Kadagar Fant, on 27 July 2016 - 07:27 AM, said:

Interesting, with the night one heal we had a scene were we could see this in effect, last night we did not have one, would we have had something if someone was guarded or not? Or did the killers refrain from killing what we suspect as our healer?

The possibilities in my mind are:

1. Heal was successful but PS didn't give us a scene because he was busy or smth.
2. Guard was successful.
3. The killer forgot to put in a provisional.
4. The killer intentionally withheld a kill to confuse the thread.

I don't want to speculate regarding the possibility of the first two options. Regarding the third option, I find it highly unlikely because almost everyone alive had checked in and posted before the day ended yesterday. The fourth option does not make sense at all to hold your kill in a 1vs7 scenario.

We can either wait for someone else to profess off-thread knowledge and give us the scum, or look at the low posters/ those that not post before end of day yesterday.

[Anomandaris]

Another option is Killer hitting the infected one and triggering zombie virus to action

[Aparal Forge]

Shadow, on 27 July 2016 - 08:57 AM, said:

Kadagar Fant, on 27 July 2016 - 07:27 AM, said:

Interesting, with the night one heal we had a scene were we could see this in effect, last night we did not have one, would we have had something if someone was guarded or not? Or did the killers refrain from killing what we suspect as our healer?

The possibilities in my mind are:1. Heal was successful but PS didn't give us a scene because he was busy or smth.2. Guard was successful.3. The killer forgot to put in a provisional.4. The killer intentionally withheld a kill to confuse the thread.I don't want to speculate regarding the possibility of the first two options. Regarding the third option, I find it highly unlikely because almost everyone alive had checked in and posted before the day ended yesterday. The fourth option does not make sense at all to hold your kill in a 1vs7 scenario.We can either wait for someone else to profess off-thread knowledge and give us the scum, or look at the low posters/ those that not post before end of day yesterday.

Anomandaris, on 27 July 2016 - 09:02 AM, said:

Another option is Killer hitting the infected one and triggering zombie virus to action

What me worries is that Shadow (or maybe someone else) could be a zombie now. So theoretically we should lynch him to prevent a zombie apocalypse. Or scum is playing with us and wants us to lynch two times in a row a townie. If this is the actual plan ... well played scum. From that point of view I don't think that option number 4 is that unlikely, as we still can't really trust Shadow.

I'm not sure why PS did not post a scene to what happend. Maybe because it would make things to easy for town now. I don't like the act that Shadow dismisses option number 4 and does not mention the possibility of a zombie. But the advise to wait for someone to reveal off thread knowledge is probably a good idea.

I also don't think that the killer forgot to vote. Only three hours remained of the day and we had a train on Fanderay that started several hours ago. There should have been enough time for scum to tell PS who is going to die this night. And in the case that the killer had no time to watch the thread until the end of the day he would have atleast named a target and an optional replacement.

[Demelain]

I'd have hoped PS would give us some kind of indication when the zombies got activated.

Super-busy day today, won't be on again for about 12-13h probably

[Olar Ethil]

Aparal Forge, on 27 July 2016 - 12:00 PM, said:

Shadow, on 27 July 2016 - 08:57 AM, said:

Kadagar Fant, on 27 July 2016 - 07:27 AM, said:

Interesting, with the night one heal we had a scene were we could see this in effect, last night we did not have one, would we have had something if someone was guarded or not? Or did the killers refrain from killing what we suspect as our healer?

The possibilities in my mind are:1. Heal was successful but PS didn't give us a scene because he was busy or smth.2. Guard was successful.3. The killer forgot to put in a provisional.4. The killer intentionally withheld a kill to confuse the thread.I don't want to speculate regarding the possibility of the first two options. Regarding the third option, I find it highly unlikely because almost everyone alive had checked in and posted before the day ended yesterday. The fourth option does not make sense at all to hold your kill in a 1vs7 scenario.We can either wait for someone else to profess off-thread knowledge and give us the scum, or look at the low posters/ those that not post before end of day yesterday.

Anomandaris, on 27 July 2016 - 09:02 AM, said:

Another option is Killer hitting the infected one and triggering zombie virus to action

What me worries is that Shadow (or maybe someone else) could be a zombie now. So theoretically we should lynch him to prevent a zombie apocalypse. Or scum is playing with us and wants us to lynch two times in a row a townie. If this is the actual plan ... well played scum. From that point of view I don't think that option number 4 is that unlikely, as we still can't really trust Shadow.

I'm not sure why PS did not post a scene to what happend. Maybe because it would make things to easy for town now. I don't like the act that Shadow dismisses option number 4 and does not mention the possibility of a zombie. But the advise to wait for someone to reveal off thread knowledge is probably a good idea.

I also don't think that the killer forgot to vote. Only three hours remained of the day and we had a train on Fanderay that started several hours ago. There should have been enough time for scum to tell PS who is going to die this night. And in the case that the killer had no time to watch the thread until the end of the day he would have atleast named a target and an optional replacement.

A bunch of good points here.

I was leaning more towards Togg or Merrid, but lynching Shadow could be a safe option?

All I have on Merrid is his playing style - it certainly does not help Town but would lone Scum play like this? In a symp game I would have pegged him as Symp.

Togg's initial no reason vote on Kesso worries me.

As for Shadow its all speculation. There is very little hard evidence. Shadow has hinted at a reveal, not made an actual reveal. I don't really see a full lynch case yet.

[Kadagar Fant]

Olar Ethil, on 27 July 2016 - 01:18 PM, said:

Aparal Forge, on 27 July 2016 - 12:00 PM, said:

Shadow, on 27 July 2016 - 08:57 AM, said:

Kadagar Fant, on 27 July 2016 - 07:27 AM, said:

Interesting, with the night one heal we had a scene were we could see this in effect, last night we did not have one, would we have had something if someone was guarded or not? Or did the killers refrain from killing what we suspect as our healer?

The possibilities in my mind are:1. Heal was successful but PS didn't give us a scene because he was busy or smth.2. Guard was successful.3. The killer forgot to put in a provisional.4. The killer intentionally withheld a kill to confuse the thread.I don't want to speculate regarding the possibility of the first two options. Regarding the third option, I find it highly unlikely because almost everyone alive had checked in and posted before the day ended yesterday. The fourth option does not make sense at all to hold your kill in a 1vs7 scenario.We can either wait for someone else to profess off-thread knowledge and give us the scum, or look at the low posters/ those that not post before end of day yesterday.

Anomandaris, on 27 July 2016 - 09:02 AM, said:

Another option is Killer hitting the infected one and triggering zombie virus to action

What me worries is that Shadow (or maybe someone else) could be a zombie now. So theoretically we should lynch him to prevent a zombie apocalypse. Or scum is playing with us and wants us to lynch two times in a row a townie. If this is the actual plan ... well played scum. From that point of view I don't think that option number 4 is that unlikely, as we still can't really trust Shadow.

I'm not sure why PS did not post a scene to what happend. Maybe because it would make things to easy for town now. I don't like the act that Shadow dismisses option number 4 and does not mention the possibility of a zombie. But the advise to wait for someone to reveal off thread knowledge is probably a good idea.

I also don't think that the killer forgot to vote. Only three hours remained of the day and we had a train on Fanderay that started several hours ago. There should have been enough time for scum to tell PS who is going to die this night. And in the case that the killer had no time to watch the thread until the end of the day he would have atleast named a target and an optional replacement.

A bunch of good points here.

I was leaning more towards Togg or Merrid, but lynching Shadow could be a safe option?

All I have on Merrid is his playing style - it certainly does not help Town but would lone Scum play like this? In a symp game I would have pegged him as Symp.

Togg's initial no reason vote on Kesso worries me.

As for Shadow its all speculation. There is very little hard evidence. Shadow has hinted at a reveal, not made an actual reveal. I don't really see a full lynch case yet.

I see what you're saying, I'd say give Shadow an extra day, like Dem says I'd assume PS would give us information as to whether or not zomblie lord had arrived. It'd also mean that shadow was given 2 roles, healer then zombie?

[Togg]

hungover and in a meeting...

I'm kind of annoyed that Mess drove his own lynch. That wasted a day for town.

As far as the night without a kill, I'm leaning towards the guard working or the zombie mechanic. We don't have any noobs playing so I can't imagine that somebody skipped a provisional.

Let me have a look at what else I missed.

[Kadagar Fant]

Okay then let's all lynch Merrid

Vote Merrid

from here we'll have a lot more information.

[Path-Shaper]

Just to put things to rest right away - I didn't write a scene because I got busier at work, so I didn't have the time to write a scene. You'll note that I didn't write a scene for Night 2 as well. Nothing should be read into the fact that I didn't write a scene besides the fact that I didn't have time to do it.

Thanks

Blend

[Aparal Forge]

Olar Ethil, on 27 July 2016 - 01:18 PM, said:

Aparal Forge, on 27 July 2016 - 12:00 PM, said:

Shadow, on 27 July 2016 - 08:57 AM, said:

Kadagar Fant, on 27 July 2016 - 07:27 AM, said:

Interesting, with the night one heal we had a scene were we could see this in effect, last night we did not have one, would we have had something if someone was guarded or not? Or did the killers refrain from killing what we suspect as our healer?

The possibilities in my mind are:1. Heal was successful but PS didn't give us a scene because he was busy or smth.2. Guard was successful.3. The killer forgot to put in a provisional.4. The killer intentionally withheld a kill to confuse the thread.I don't want to speculate regarding the possibility of the first two options. Regarding the third option, I find it highly unlikely because almost everyone alive had checked in and posted before the day ended yesterday. The fourth option does not make sense at all to hold your kill in a 1vs7 scenario.We can either wait for someone else to profess off-thread knowledge and give us the scum, or look at the low posters/ those that not post before end of day yesterday.

Anomandaris, on 27 July 2016 - 09:02 AM, said:

Another option is Killer hitting the infected one and triggering zombie virus to action

What me worries is that Shadow (or maybe someone else) could be a zombie now. So theoretically we should lynch him to prevent a zombie apocalypse. Or scum is playing with us and wants us to lynch two times in a row a townie. If this is the actual plan ... well played scum. From that point of view I don't think that option number 4 is that unlikely, as we still can't really trust Shadow.I'm not sure why PS did not post a scene to what happend. Maybe because it would make things to easy for town now. I don't like the act that Shadow dismisses option number 4 and does not mention the possibility of a zombie. But the advise to wait for someone to reveal off thread knowledge is probably a good idea. I also don't think that the killer forgot to vote. Only three hours remained of the day and we had a train on Fanderay that started several hours ago. There should have been enough time for scum to tell PS who is going to die this night. And in the case that the killer had no time to watch the thread until the end of the day he would have atleast named a target and an optional replacement.

A bunch of good points here.I was leaning more towards Togg or Merrid, but lynching Shadow could be a safe option?All I have on Merrid is his playing style - it certainly does not help Town but would lone Scum play like this? In a symp game I would have pegged him as Symp. Togg's initial no reason vote on Kesso worries me. As for Shadow its all speculation. There is very little hard evidence. Shadow has hinted at a reveal, not made an actual reveal. I don't really see a full lynch case yet.

I agree with you in the cases of Togg and Merrid as possible lynch targets.

The problem with a Shadow lynch is really that it is pure speculation. This is the first time that we have the possibility of a zombie and currently only eight players remain. A zombie with recruit ability could turn the whole game.

On the other hand I got an idea: In case that we have a zombie in the game, the killer would have also a reason to eliminate him, right? I guess if the zombie recruits someone the new zombie will get the identity of his leader. So it will be difficult for the killer to survive once the faction grows. The safest way for the killer would be to nightkill the potential zombie he couldn't kill last night. Our guard, if still alive, guards the same player like last night, who is maybe the killer. I guess the healer, if still alive, should also heal the same person. As long as the message for the killer only said that the nightkill failed, and not how, he would be forced to do the same action as last night to prevent a zombie-invasion. So we should maybe focus on the killer today and hope that there is now zombie.

Any faults in my thoughts?

[Aparal Forge]

Kadagar Fant, on 27 July 2016 - 01:39 PM, said:

Olar Ethil, on 27 July 2016 - 01:18 PM, said:

Aparal Forge, on 27 July 2016 - 12:00 PM, said:

Shadow, on 27 July 2016 - 08:57 AM, said:

Kadagar Fant, on 27 July 2016 - 07:27 AM, said:

Interesting, with the night one heal we had a scene were we could see this in effect, last night we did not have one, would we have had something if someone was guarded or not? Or did the killers refrain from killing what we suspect as our healer?

The possibilities in my mind are:1. Heal was successful but PS didn't give us a scene because he was busy or smth.2. Guard was successful.3. The killer forgot to put in a provisional.4. The killer intentionally withheld a kill to confuse the thread.I don't want to speculate regarding the possibility of the first two options. Regarding the third option, I find it highly unlikely because almost everyone alive had checked in and posted before the day ended yesterday. The fourth option does not make sense at all to hold your kill in a 1vs7 scenario.We can either wait for someone else to profess off-thread knowledge and give us the scum, or look at the low posters/ those that not post before end of day yesterday.

Anomandaris, on 27 July 2016 - 09:02 AM, said:

Another option is Killer hitting the infected one and triggering zombie virus to action

What me worries is that Shadow (or maybe someone else) could be a zombie now. So theoretically we should lynch him to prevent a zombie apocalypse. Or scum is playing with us and wants us to lynch two times in a row a townie. If this is the actual plan ... well played scum. From that point of view I don't think that option number 4 is that unlikely, as we still can't really trust Shadow.I'm not sure why PS did not post a scene to what happend. Maybe because it would make things to easy for town now. I don't like the act that Shadow dismisses option number 4 and does not mention the possibility of a zombie. But the advise to wait for someone to reveal off thread knowledge is probably a good idea. I also don't think that the killer forgot to vote. Only three hours remained of the day and we had a train on Fanderay that started several hours ago. There should have been enough time for scum to tell PS who is going to die this night. And in the case that the killer had no time to watch the thread until the end of the day he would have atleast named a target and an optional replacement.

A bunch of good points here.I was leaning more towards Togg or Merrid, but lynching Shadow could be a safe option?All I have on Merrid is his playing style - it certainly does not help Town but would lone Scum play like this? In a symp game I would have pegged him as Symp. Togg's initial no reason vote on Kesso worries me. As for Shadow its all speculation. There is very little hard evidence. Shadow has hinted at a reveal, not made an actual reveal. I don't really see a full lynch case yet.

I see what you're saying, I'd say give Shadow an extra day, like Dem says I'd assume PS would give us information as to whether or not zomblie lord had arrived. It'd also mean that shadow was given 2 roles, healer then zombie?

Okay, did not thought about that. So shadow-zombie is probably unlikely if he is not the killer

[Path-Shaper]

It is Day 4. 21 hours and 11 minutes remaining

8 Players still alive: Anomandaris, Aparal Forge, Demelain, Kadagar Fant, Merrid, Olar Ethil, Shadow, Togg

5 votes to lynch, 4 votes to go to night.

1 Vote for Merrid ( Kadagar Fant )

Players not voted: Anomandaris, Aparal Forge, Demelain, Merrid, Olar Ethil, Shadow, Togg