Mafia 133 - Buffy The Vampire Slayer Game Thread
#501
Posted 11 July 2016 - 02:27 PM
I'm about to get into the subway, so i'll check in later as well.
#502
Posted 11 July 2016 - 03:02 PM
#503
Posted 11 July 2016 - 03:04 PM
Olar Ethil, on 11 July 2016 - 02:24 PM, said:
I'm happy to leave it a little longer for others to get back on after the weekend. I'm off to get a haircut, and will vote for Shadow when I return (barring some game-changing revelation, obvs).
Do you think that Fanderay is deliberately trying to drive a case on Shadow because they're an easy target?
#504
Posted 11 July 2016 - 03:08 PM
Olar Ethil, on 11 July 2016 - 12:36 PM, said:
Fanderay, on 11 July 2016 - 10:00 AM, said:
Olar Ethil, on 11 July 2016 - 09:46 AM, said:
Having said that Fandy, obviously I disagree with you just taking KF at their word. Not saying it couldn't be true, but I find the lack of scrutiny worrying.
Well the only way to test KF is to lynch someone he has cleared which is quite risky. I don't see a bad guy having the find ability, so his early finds must be legit.
A big problem though would be Emur being the recruiter, recruiting KF and making a play to get Korlat lynched and painting suspicion elsewhere whilst KF clears him. However, KF's play hasn't indicated he's turned, and he must have some abilities blocking his recruitment because he revealed early in the game. Normally you'd save your reveal especially when there have been no night kills.
No I have no issue with KF's earlier play. Your reasoning is sound re KF must have had some blocking ability/abilities otherwise why reveal so early...up to a point. First, obviously maybe KF wasn't that sensible

Of course, the third option is that vamps are incompetent.
You're forgetting that I have an NA.
You're forgetting that there are likely other NAs in game. We've seen nothing of Xander so far.
Also, re-think your finder who cannot be recruited - I'm a vamp already which makes me somewhat hard to recruit by turning me into a vampire, no?
#505
Posted 11 July 2016 - 03:09 PM
Emurlahn, on 11 July 2016 - 03:04 PM, said:
Olar Ethil, on 11 July 2016 - 02:24 PM, said:
I'm happy to leave it a little longer for others to get back on after the weekend. I'm off to get a haircut, and will vote for Shadow when I return (barring some game-changing revelation, obvs).
Do you think that Fanderay is deliberately trying to drive a case on Shadow because they're an easy target?
They've come up with it only after some people showed reluctance to vote Shadow and some came up with their suspicions about Fandy
#506
Posted 11 July 2016 - 03:18 PM
Emurlahn, on 11 July 2016 - 03:02 PM, said:
W/e. I had the L-1 vote on Shadow already, but removed so he could say his piece w/o someone like Denul hammering while he's talking
I wasn't convinced by his attack on you as an alternative. I'm around while @ work, can vote at any time there's a consensus. If not my vote will go back there before I leave work, which is 2h b4 timeout.
#507
Posted 11 July 2016 - 03:20 PM
I'm not reluctant to vote shadow. I just said I have no read on him.
#508
Posted 11 July 2016 - 03:22 PM
#509
Posted 11 July 2016 - 03:23 PM
Emurlahn, on 11 July 2016 - 03:04 PM, said:
Olar Ethil, on 11 July 2016 - 02:24 PM, said:
I'm happy to leave it a little longer for others to get back on after the weekend. I'm off to get a haircut, and will vote for Shadow when I return (barring some game-changing revelation, obvs).
Do you think that Fanderay is deliberately trying to drive a case on Shadow because they're an easy target?
Now he thinks I'm going to steal it from him.
#510
Posted 11 July 2016 - 03:24 PM
#511
Posted 11 July 2016 - 03:34 PM
Emurlahn, on 11 July 2016 - 03:04 PM, said:
Olar Ethil, on 11 July 2016 - 02:24 PM, said:
I'm happy to leave it a little longer for others to get back on after the weekend. I'm off to get a haircut, and will vote for Shadow when I return (barring some game-changing revelation, obvs).
Do you think that Fanderay is deliberately trying to drive a case on Shadow because they're an easy target?
No, I don't think so. I actually have a more positive feeling about Fanderay than I do Shadow. I was wary earlier on, however, because there seemed to be little case attached to the lynch drive on Shadow.
#512
Posted 11 July 2016 - 03:40 PM
This seem a somewhat odd post to make.
You're forgetting that I have an NA.
I am not forgetting that. Neither am I forgetting that you claim to have guarded Korlat most nights, who turned out not to be a vamp. So I don't see much relevance there so far.
Again, not forgetting that. But I am sceptical about how many NAs there really are. I say that based on my own self - a prominent character, but no actions to speak of.
Uh, no? It's about converting you to a side. Those sides can be called school or vamps, or teddy bears and heffalumps. What you are as a character has little relevance to that from what I know (the only exception being un-recruitable characters, which you and KF have already said you are not).
Emurlahn, on 11 July 2016 - 03:08 PM, said:
You're forgetting that I have an NA.
I am not forgetting that. Neither am I forgetting that you claim to have guarded Korlat most nights, who turned out not to be a vamp. So I don't see much relevance there so far.
Quote
You're forgetting that there are likely other NAs in game. We've seen nothing of Xander so far.
Again, not forgetting that. But I am sceptical about how many NAs there really are. I say that based on my own self - a prominent character, but no actions to speak of.
Quote
Also, re-think your finder who cannot be recruited - I'm a vamp already which makes me somewhat hard to recruit by turning me into a vampire, no?
Uh, no? It's about converting you to a side. Those sides can be called school or vamps, or teddy bears and heffalumps. What you are as a character has little relevance to that from what I know (the only exception being un-recruitable characters, which you and KF have already said you are not).
#514
Posted 11 July 2016 - 04:00 PM
Anyone else ha anything to add? In about 15 min i'll vote so we can move the day along.
#515
Posted 11 July 2016 - 04:12 PM
#517
Posted 11 July 2016 - 04:18 PM
#518
Posted 11 July 2016 - 04:22 PM
It is a lynch!
It is Day 6. 6 hours 38 minutes remain.
8 players still alive: (Denul,Fanderay, Emurlahn,Telas,Shadow,Togg,Kadagar Fant,Olar Ethil)
5 votes to lynch. 5 votes to go night.
5 votes Shadow (Fanderay,Togg, Kadagar Fant, Olar Ethil, Telas)
1 vote Fanderay (Emurlahn)
Players not voted: (Denul, Telas, Shadow,Olar Ethil)
Shadow was Rupert Giles and Buffy's Watcher. He was played by Andorion.
It is now night.
It is Day 6. 6 hours 38 minutes remain.
8 players still alive: (Denul,Fanderay, Emurlahn,Telas,Shadow,Togg,Kadagar Fant,Olar Ethil)
5 votes to lynch. 5 votes to go night.
5 votes Shadow (Fanderay,Togg, Kadagar Fant, Olar Ethil, Telas)
1 vote Fanderay (Emurlahn)
Players not voted: (Denul, Telas, Shadow,Olar Ethil)
Shadow was Rupert Giles and Buffy's Watcher. He was played by Andorion.
It is now night.
Only someone with this much power could make this many frittatas without breaking any eggs.
#519
Posted 11 July 2016 - 04:26 PM
Olar Ethil, on 11 July 2016 - 03:40 PM, said:
Quote
Also, re-think your finder who cannot be recruited - I'm a vamp already which makes me somewhat hard to recruit by turning me into a vampire, no?
Uh, no? It's about converting you to a side. Those sides can be called school or vamps, or teddy bears and heffalumps. What you are as a character has little relevance to that from what I know (the only exception being un-recruitable characters, which you and KF have already said you are not).
KF said Emur could choose their side, if that's true I don't think he could be recruited. He can't be turned by being vamped and I think vampires would have it difficult persuading someone who has already made his mind about not wanting to be in vampire faction even if they had a chance