QuickTidal, on 05 May 2016 - 03:21 PM, said:
I liked FIREFLY, but I never got why it was SO huge. It's a solid show, and it really was only gaining momentum as it ended...but really, it wasn't the second coming so many people seem to indicate it was. ...
FIREFLY was never SO huge. It just had a very vocal fanbase, many of whom were BUFFY fans carrying the Joss-love forward regardless of whatever he was doing. These are the same people who loved DOLLHOUSE, but i digress...
In retro, FIREFLY was huge enough to have survived if Fox hadn't jumped the gun so utterly and killed it, but even so, massive ratings eyeballs dollars success not so much.
Nevyn, on 05 May 2016 - 03:41 PM, said:
champ, on 05 May 2016 - 03:38 PM, said:
Nevyn, on 05 May 2016 - 03:23 PM, said:
QuickTidal, on 05 May 2016 - 03:21 PM, said:
I liked FIREFLY, but I never got why it was SO huge. It's a solid show, and it really was only gaining momentum as it ended...but really, it wasn't the second coming so many people seem to indicate it was. If we can throw up Whedon comparisons...it seemed like it was ANGEL rather than BUFFY. If that makes sense.
Can we split the firefly discussion to another thread? This thread is meant to be about hijacking Lost discussion by talking about 24.
For some reason I watched the first 2 seasons of 24 and never got around to watching anymore of it. Sacrilgious I know!
Well, at least you were around for "I'm gonna need a hacksaw"
Honestly, the show never quite got back to that high point.
Nevyn, on 05 May 2016 - 06:30 PM, said:
Abyss, on 05 May 2016 - 05:41 PM, said:
I still say Sayid could have taken Jack Bauer in a fight.
A fight might be close, but Jack could definitely torture information out of Sayid, while Sayid would have a personal crisis before he got Jack to break. Heck, he couldn't even break Sawyer!
Yes he did. And that was with an audience and sub-par tools.
Anyhow, Jack was a talented amature, Sayid was all pro torture.
...no wonder Shannen was into him.
Briar King, on 05 May 2016 - 08:22 PM, said:
Y'all can eat my ass seriously...
What am I re watching now?
ALCATRAZ.
...i'm still bitter about how that ended.
champ, on 05 May 2016 - 08:48 PM, said:
Briar King, on 05 May 2016 - 08:22 PM, said:
Y'all can eat my ass seriously...
What am I re watching now?
Breaking Bad?
Or that. That's good too.
Werthead, on 05 May 2016 - 11:50 PM, said:
...Well, ANGEL was better than BUFFY (although that may not be fair as it learned from all its parent show's mistakes and avoided them, like DS9 and TNG), so I'm not sure what you're going for there.
Yes/no. Angel Seasons 1 -3 and the first half of 4 were mostly like the bestest parts of Buffy but less cutesy. The balance of S4 (Cordelia's pregnancy, Connor, whatever the fuck else was going on there) and all of S5 where they sort of only not really took over Wolfram n Hart were just atrocious, minus the finale.
Quote
What I do find odd is when people have watched/heard of FIREFLY but never seen BATTLESTAR GALACTICA. They aired within a few months of each other, but BSG got higher viewing figures, lasted a hell of a lot longer (80 episodes, a mini-series, three TV movies and a 20-episode spin-off prequel), had far more fantastic episodes (I mean, it had 37 episodes plus the mini series which were straight-through excellent, with the weakest episode in that bloc - Black Market - not really being that awful), dealt with weightier themes, had comparably awesome characters, far superior worldbuilding (FIREFLY's solar system makes absolutely zero sense) and better fx.
Not so odd. FIREFLY fans were migrating Joss fans. BSG fans were sf fans. Obviously there was some crossover, but the majority were split along those lines, i think.
Quote
Quote
A fight might be close, but Jack could definitely torture information out of Sayid, while Sayid would have a personal crisis before he got Jack to break. Heck, he couldn't even break Sawyer!
He did break Sawyer. Sawyer gave in after like 5 seconds of torture, it was pretty weak going on his part.
Sawyer was always a wimp. He never actually won a fight that wasn't against someone old and weak.
QuickTidal, on 05 May 2016 - 11:58 PM, said:
Werthead, on 05 May 2016 - 11:50 PM, said:
Well, ANGEL was better than BUFFY
^^This opinon is the minority, I assure you. BUFFY is a thousand times better than ANGEL. You know who you see at comic con? BUFFY fans....you rarely see ANGEL fans.
I think there are very few ANGEL fans who weren't BUFFY fans, but many more of the opposite. BUFFY is still the cultural benchmark, ANGEL was a spinoff, albeit a good one.
Briar King, on 06 May 2016 - 03:05 AM, said:
Ep 2 Locke is talking to Walt about a game holding up the stones...light and dark. Ha
Damn... i have like a thousand+ hours of solid tv in the can and you're making me want to re-watch. Semi-re-re, i've seen most of it twice.
Werthead, on 06 May 2016 - 10:36 AM, said:
...BUFFY came first and most people saw it first, so it has the whole nostalgia thing going on. ...Joss Whedon had a hideous problem with keeping characters around because he liked the actors, long after the character had ceased to do anything particularly interesting (Oz, Spike and Tara most notably, but Anya was the most egregious example).
ANGEL was vastly more consistent in quality, was (deliberately) more mature and its character arcs were just a touch better delineated. The show was better at getting rid of characters once their purpose was served (Lorne probably is the only one they kept hanging around when he had nothing to do, but then he did get a great moment in the finale) and it was much more morally murkier and interesting than BUFFY (the Fred/Illyria stuff was amazing). The consistent series-long threat of Wolfram & Hart gave the show a continuity and tension that BUFFY lacked, and Angel and Cordelia were certainly much-better explored on ANGEL than they ever were on the parent show. Arguably BUFFY might have just the edge on the best-ever episodes (Hush and The Body, most notably) but then ANGEL never had an episode anywhere near as bad as Beer Bad or at least half of Season 6. And there is absolutely zero contest on the ending: ANGEL might have the best ending of any supernatural show ever. The badass attitude of that finale is something to behold.
I agree with most of this.
Fred/Illyria was a bad retread of what had just happened to Cordy the previous season, but Amy Acker is just so great that she almost sort of saved it. Almost. I still hate everything about that season except the finale.
Quote
It's the DS9/TNG thing again: DS9 is more dramatically intense, far more serialised, has much better characters and is far more consistent in quality, but it's hard to argue against TNG coming first and maybe having a couple of better episodes than the average of both series.
TNG may have been the better show, but
DS9 was the better story.
QuickTidal, on 06 May 2016 - 11:38 AM, said:
...And Re: the finale...I agree that was a great finale on ANGEL...I loved it. But the BUFFY finale had emotional weight, and that wins out when watching TV every time. It's the difference between getting someone to say "That was cool" and "That affected me emotionally". BUFFY earned that, and ANGEL didn't.
I would give ANGEL more emo kudos than that, but the last season squandered those feels while BUFFY S6 brought back most of what had been lost in S5.
Finale vs Finale, i give it to BUFFY because there was way more emotional investment by that point while ANGEL felt like a last hurrah before putting the show out of its misery.
LOST was good tho'.