[Anomandaris]

Hey Charlie, join the next game. You too can look like an idiot on thread!

[Karosis]

I would also prefer not to vote for Emur. As most folks said already I dont think scum would play like so and target themselves.

Also dont know if I like lynching him just because of that but it did seem like he continued and doesn't really want to acknowledge that it was problem.

[Ryllandaras]

Liosan, on 06 October 2015 - 04:11 PM, said:

sorry I'm checking in. sick yesterday. but only a few pages of posts? guess catching up won't take me too long.

And then...

[Monok Ochem]

Anomandaris, on 06 October 2015 - 07:48 PM, said:

I always look for the useless, "helpful" posters. As of now that's Aparal Forge who has 4 or 5 posts which say absolutely nothing original.

I'll vote to get a lynch, but Emurlahn is too idiotic to be scum.

I agree. Aparal struck me similarly, though I have even stronger feelings about Kadagar (who has, yep, now jumped on Emur to try and give that lynch some steam).

[Demelain]

Ryllandaras, on 06 October 2015 - 08:19 PM, said:

I see Omtose' point about looking at the symps rather than killers. What I meant about misdirection is getting people to look at Liosan as a fake signal. Draw attention to himself and create a lot of wrong discussion on thread. I didn't want yo focus solely on Emur I was just commenting on what I saw but Omtose made it something more than what it was.

So, you basically claim that you suspected them of being a symp for trying to grab the attention of the thread to misdirect the discussion. Well, in hindsight, Emur's vote(s) did grab the attention of the thread, in fact there are still four votes on them, but I just don't see why a symp would do that so early. As others have also stated, I don't think scum would play like that as it might get them lynched today. And you did get edgy very quickly.

Well, I don't know, I don't have much of a case against you and you're not the most popular lynch candidate at the moment. I'll remove my vote to consider my final vote of the day, I really have to go to bed in fifteen minutes.

Remove Vote

[Monok Ochem]

Vote Kadagar Fant

To put money where my mouth is.

[Kadagar Fant]

Monok Ochem, on 06 October 2015 - 09:28 PM, said:

Vote Kadagar Fant

To put money where my mouth is.

And your reasoning is???

[Anomandaris]

Kadagar looks like they are trying to participate.

[Monok Ochem]

Kadagar Fant, on 06 October 2015 - 09:33 PM, said:

Monok Ochem, on 06 October 2015 - 09:28 PM, said:

Vote Kadagar Fant

To put money where my mouth is.

And your reasoning is???

I only have like 6 posts, I'm sure you can go back and have a look jumpy.

[Demelain]

Anomandaris, on 06 October 2015 - 08:12 PM, said:

I'm never adverse to a no lynch day 1 where nothing substantial has taken place. In this instance, to be rid of idiocy I'd vote to get rid of Emurlahn, but without any conviction.

Fanderay, on 06 October 2015 - 08:23 PM, said:

I agree with your statement d1 lynches are generally crapshoots*, in most scenarios you're better off not lynching but if someone goofs on d1, people are always gona drag it back up. Furthermore voting off a less helpful player early on isn't the worst move we can make. I can appreaciate stirring discussion as i've done earlier in the thread but this isn't stirring, it's full blown kicking the bees nest without wearing any protection.

*as well as putting content on the thread.

Anomandaris, on 06 October 2015 - 08:35 PM, said:

Which is why I'd vote it to get a lynch. But, do you really expect a scum outcome? I don't and it's why I'm not immediately voting. If I'm wrong and Emurlahn is scum I'll take my ass-beating with good nature.

Karosis, on 06 October 2015 - 08:52 PM, said:

I would also prefer not to vote for Emur. As most folks said already I dont think scum would play like so and target themselves.

Also dont know if I like lynching him just because of that but it did seem like he continued and doesn't really want to acknowledge that it was problem.

So, basically you all think Emurlahn's not scum, but just played like an idiot to grab the attention of the thread for a full day.

Well, I just did a quick read of Emurlahn's posts and, besides grabbing attention, Emur added zero content to the thread. The only think they did was to continue causing controversy way past the point it should have been obvious that a second "no post" vote would cause controversy.

It's a strange play for scum, considering the massive lynch risk, but I fail to see a benefit for town as well. Maybe it was indeed just idiocy.

[Anomandaris]

Being stupid and voting for people is at least an attempt. At worst, Emur is a symp. But for who? They've done a great job of littering the thread with idiotic posts and thus making it a bombfield, which is why I say I'd vote to get a lynch.

[Kadagar Fant]

Monok Ochem, on 06 October 2015 - 09:35 PM, said:

Kadagar Fant, on 06 October 2015 - 09:33 PM, said:

Monok Ochem, on 06 October 2015 - 09:28 PM, said:

Vote Kadagar Fant

To put money where my mouth is.

And your reasoning is???

I only have like 6 posts, I'm sure you can go back and have a look jumpy.

Oh right, this is your lazy excuse of trying to look like you've been participating.

[Monok Ochem]

Kadagar Fant, on 06 October 2015 - 09:54 PM, said:

Monok Ochem, on 06 October 2015 - 09:35 PM, said:

Kadagar Fant, on 06 October 2015 - 09:33 PM, said:

Monok Ochem, on 06 October 2015 - 09:28 PM, said:

Vote Kadagar Fant

To put money where my mouth is.

And your reasoning is???

I only have like 6 posts, I'm sure you can go back and have a look jumpy.

Oh right, this is your lazy excuse of trying to look like you've been participating.

Apologies, I didn't realise voting for you was sacrosanct. I said I didn't fancy the Emur vote. I said I didn't like your behaviour (and predicted correctly that you would vote for Emur). And then I voted for you.

Hmm, smells like fairly good participation to me.

[Fanderay]

Demelain, on 06 October 2015 - 09:37 PM, said:

Anomandaris, on 06 October 2015 - 08:12 PM, said:

I'm never adverse to a no lynch day 1 where nothing substantial has taken place. In this instance, to be rid of idiocy I'd vote to get rid of Emurlahn, but without any conviction.

Fanderay, on 06 October 2015 - 08:23 PM, said:

I agree with your statement d1 lynches are generally crapshoots*, in most scenarios you're better off not lynching but if someone goofs on d1, people are always gona drag it back up. Furthermore voting off a less helpful player early on isn't the worst move we can make. I can appreaciate stirring discussion as i've done earlier in the thread but this isn't stirring, it's full blown kicking the bees nest without wearing any protection.

*as well as putting content on the thread.

Anomandaris, on 06 October 2015 - 08:35 PM, said:

Which is why I'd vote it to get a lynch. But, do you really expect a scum outcome? I don't and it's why I'm not immediately voting. If I'm wrong and Emurlahn is scum I'll take my ass-beating with good nature.

Karosis, on 06 October 2015 - 08:52 PM, said:

I would also prefer not to vote for Emur. As most folks said already I dont think scum would play like so and target themselves.

Also dont know if I like lynching him just because of that but it did seem like he continued and doesn't really want to acknowledge that it was problem.

So, basically you all think Emurlahn's not scum, but just played like an idiot to grab the attention of the thread for a full day.

Well, I just did a quick read of Emurlahn's posts and, besides grabbing attention, Emur added zero content to the thread. The only think they did was to continue causing controversy way past the point it should have been obvious that a second "no post" vote would cause controversy.

It's a strange play for scum, considering the massive lynch risk, but I fail to see a benefit for town as well. Maybe it was indeed just idiocy.

im open to alternatives KF is sketchy, ryl is jumpy but that could just as easily a simply misstep, we all do it time to time. At this point in the game however i don't see the value in keeping emurh around.He could be a symp betting on us not thinking hes a symp (wifom i know), regardless everytime we discuss future lynch candidates hes going to be brought up

[Anomandaris]

PS can we get a count and time?

Thanks.

[Demelain]

I think there's approximately 5 hours and 41 minutes left.

I have to turn in for the night, it's way past the time I was planning anyway.

I'm actually willing to vote Emurlahn, just to stop us going round and round in circles, so I'll do that now.

Vote Emurlahn

[Emurlahn]

jezzus. So not only are we not hunting low posters, now we're lymching people for advocating doing so.

Fuck all y'all.

[Anomandaris]

Your contributions amount to negative posts, so that's even worse than a low poster.

Vote Emurlahn

[Emurlahn]

I'm your healer you stupid fucks.

[Liosan]

Emurlahn, on 06 October 2015 - 11:03 PM, said:

I'm your healer you stupid fucks.

oh fuck me. I just finish rereading and I get to this and are you fucking serious.

god dammit. you know we have to lynch you now right? you never EVER REVEAL HEALER you lying scum shitbag. and if you are really the healer then you really fucked yourself and town.

GOD DAMMIT