[Shinrei]

I'll trade for Luck now that I've lost Romo. Make me an offer.

[Tapper]

 Brujah, on 21 September 2015 - 12:28 PM, said:

Tapps, still interested in Brady or has Mr. Palmer made you complacent, with his getting hurt every season, not to mention his inconsistency. Just saying.

I might just keep Brady and trade off Luck. Figure maybe HD wouldn't mind having his boy, but then again he's already got D. Brees, although Brees isn't the QB we've grown to depend on these last few years; slight shoulder injury, suspect O line, and no Graham for a safety blanket.

But looking over your lineup, not that I'd think you'd consider a trade, but I need a RB and I don't think you have anyone you'd be willing to lose that I'd be willing to take. So, oh well.

I'd be interested, but I wouldn't give you the value of an early round pick, nor multiple players.

[twelve]

Man the injury bug has been hitting me hard this year too. It's a revolving door every week as who do I put in that will actually play this week. And now that Romo is out do I even still play Dez when he does come back from his broken foot? How long did they say Romo was going to be out?

[Stalker]

Probably like 6-8 weeks for that injury. And I hear Dez is looking at 8-12. Rough for the Cowboys to lose their top two players.

I liked Terrance Williams as a late draft pick but curious about how losing Romo will affect him now.

[Vengeance]

Just heard that Brees is going to be out now as well. Seems the shoulder that he injured is more serious then previously thought.

[Shinrei]

I forget, do we have an IR slot on our lineup settings?

[Stalker]

Nope. I had mentioned it before the draft but no one seemed interested. Seems like more injuries this year than in the past, which is too bad.

[HoosierDaddy]

My team's bad and I feel bad. My RB's are straight choking.

Plus, the Colts suck. So, I've got that going for me, which is nice.

[Shinrei]

 Stalker, on 22 September 2015 - 01:06 AM, said:

Nope. I had mentioned it before the draft but no one seemed interested. Seems like more injuries this year than in the past, which is too bad.

Yeah, makes for the decision of using up bench space on Romo or cutting him loose.

[Tapper]

 Shinrei, on 22 September 2015 - 02:34 AM, said:

 Stalker, on 22 September 2015 - 01:06 AM, said:

Nope. I had mentioned it before the draft but no one seemed interested. Seems like more injuries this year than in the past, which is too bad.

Yeah, makes for the decision of using up bench space on Romo or cutting him loose.

I'll trade you Eli for Romo.

[Shinrei]

I have to say, of all the times I've ever played in a fantasy game where I lost my QB early in the game (it's happened to me quite a bit, actually) this is perhaps the first that I've still hung on to win.

[Tattersail_]

Long may my luck continue.

LeGarrette Blount is a massive non entity. Are the Patriots a throw only team?

[Tapper]

 Tattersail_, on 22 September 2015 - 01:45 PM, said:

Long may my luck continue.

LeGarrette Blount is a massive non entity. Are the Patriots a throw only team?

They are a team that focuses on the opponent and adapt.

Against the Steelers they were traditionally throw-heavy, and against the Bills' excellent offense they also decided that throwing was the best tactic. But against the Colts for example they nearly ran every single ball in the last three games they played against them.

You'll see Blount when a blunt instrument is the tactic Belichick deems necessary. You are a bit unlucky because Dion Lewis (if I have the name correctly) is currently doing pretty well.

[Tattersail_]

Can other people see a waiver claim?

Ie if I try to get someone can you see who I'm trying to get?

[Vengeance]

 Tattersail_, on 22 September 2015 - 05:27 PM, said:

Can other people see a waiver claim?

Ie if I try to get someone can you see who I'm trying to get?

Just to verify can you put it down here. We will then tell you if that matches what we see.

[Tattersail_]

 Vengeance, on 22 September 2015 - 05:31 PM, said:

 Tattersail_, on 22 September 2015 - 05:27 PM, said:

Can other people see a waiver claim?

Ie if I try to get someone can you see who I'm trying to get?

Just to verify can you put it down here. We will then tell you if that matches what we see.

Venge good try. You'd verify it by letting me know without my saying. Like so.

I wanted to grab Mariota last week aswel as Johnson but you got there first.

I'm happy I don't have that headache though. Look at Brujah with Luck and Brady.

[Tattersail_]

Look at all those transactions.

I think I got a steal there. I think he'll do well in a few weeks time.

[twelve]

Is there a way to put up a player that plays earlier than Sunday on waivers as soon as the game they play in starts until the end of the waiver period? Brujah has twice grabbed someone that I was trying to add and the first one he was able to grab as a FA after the guy played on Thursday night when if he played on Sunday would have been on waivers after the game or even before the game. I'm not the most active when I look for players to add or drop and the whole point of waivers is to give everyone equal shot at hot waiver commodities. Just a thought.

[Slow Ben]

 twelve, on 23 September 2015 - 09:35 PM, said:

Is there a way to put up a player that plays earlier than Sunday on waivers as soon as the game they play in starts until the end of the waiver period? Brujah has twice grabbed someone that I was trying to add and the first one he was able to grab as a FA after the guy played on Thursday night when if he played on Sunday would have been on waivers after the game or even before the game. I'm not the most active when I look for players to add or drop and the whole point of waivers is to give everyone equal shot at hot waiver commodities. Just a thought.

Really? That shouldn't be right.

I'll look into it, and unless everyone has a problem with me changing it, I'll see what o can do.

[Shinrei]

Yeah, once someone has played on Thursday they should only be eligible for waiver claims until the following week, not lumped in with the other FA's whose games haven't gone yet.

I have no objections to fixing this if it's indeed broken.