[Bendal Home]

Bendal Home, on 02 June 2015 - 02:46 PM, said:

Serc, on 02 June 2015 - 02:44 PM, said:

Bendal Home, on 02 June 2015 - 01:53 PM, said:

Serc, on 02 June 2015 - 12:08 PM, said:

Shadow, on 02 June 2015 - 11:46 AM, said:

Im not so sure that Shin would be so obvious as to give roles to the most obvious of posters especially with us simply lynching the loudest of us the last few months. Then again that really is WIFOM as he could have done it betting that we would second guess ourselves for just those reasons. That being said the thinking can be confirmed by lynching one of the two. It wouldnt be totally pointless as it could help give us a little info about whats going on. On the other hand as Denesmet highlighted roles could be handed to low posters as well and when was the last time we went on a low poster hunt D1? I need to ruminate on this a bit.

So which role did you get? ;]

I didn't get any, thanks.

I didn't address this to you, but Shadow - and it looks like you are suspicious of them for the same post

Doesn't matter who you address it to, I have to answer.

Although I will concede yes, I was suspicious from that same post

[Path-Shaper]

I am going to bed. As such, I will miss the "final 8-hour update" which will occur 2 hours before Day 1 times out.

As such, if anyone chooses to send me a Provisional Action between hours 32 and 34, I will respect that Prov and carry out the action if you are in fact awarded the Monocle. If you did not get the monocle, I'll just delete your Prov PM. I will also throw out any Provs made before the 32 hour mark, and those made after Timeout/Lynch.

Disregard all of this if a lynch happens before 32 hours have passed.

No more Roles or Parodies will be awarded today.

[Bendal Home]

Bendal Home, on 02 June 2015 - 02:46 PM, said:

Bendal Home, on 02 June 2015 - 02:46 PM, said:

Serc, on 02 June 2015 - 02:44 PM, said:

Bendal Home, on 02 June 2015 - 01:53 PM, said:

Serc, on 02 June 2015 - 12:08 PM, said:

Shadow, on 02 June 2015 - 11:46 AM, said:

Im not so sure that Shin would be so obvious as to give roles to the most obvious of posters especially with us simply lynching the loudest of us the last few months. Then again that really is WIFOM as he could have done it betting that we would second guess ourselves for just those reasons. That being said the thinking can be confirmed by lynching one of the two. It wouldnt be totally pointless as it could help give us a little info about whats going on. On the other hand as Denesmet highlighted roles could be handed to low posters as well and when was the last time we went on a low poster hunt D1? I need to ruminate on this a bit.

So which role did you get? ;]

I didn't get any, thanks.

I didn't address this to you, but Shadow - and it looks like you are suspicious of them for the same post

Doesn't matter who you address it to, I have to answer.

Although I will concede yes, I was suspicious from that same post

Although I had to wonder if anyone would be quite so obvious.

[Bendal Home]

I've got some DIY to do. Oh no, I'm being weak again Eloth!

[Serc]

Why did you later add them to your "clear list"?

[Serc]

Fanderay, on 02 June 2015 - 02:39 PM, said:

We getting down to end of day yet? Spamming the thread is going to make it harder for us to lynch. I see your posts and skip down to someone else's.

People like Gait asking you pointless questions is not going to help us lynch.

I'm good for Gait being scummy.

No focus on teamwork at all

What is your problem with Gait?

I am down for teamwork, but I have seen no indication that anyone is trying to actually form a team.

[Bendal Home]

Serc, on 02 June 2015 - 02:59 PM, said:

Why did you later add them to your "clear list"?

Because they didn't post between PS update 8 and 16 hours

[Bendal Home]

Serc, on 02 June 2015 - 03:01 PM, said:

Fanderay, on 02 June 2015 - 02:39 PM, said:

We getting down to end of day yet? Spamming the thread is going to make it harder for us to lynch. I see your posts and skip down to someone else's.

People like Gait asking you pointless questions is not going to help us lynch.

I'm good for Gait being scummy.

No focus on teamwork at all

What is your problem with Gait?

I am down for teamwork, but I have seen no indication that anyone is trying to actually form a team.

I don't have a problem with Gait. His moves on the dancefloor have been poor but I'll give him time to learn better

[Tholen]

Bendal Home, on 02 June 2015 - 02:02 PM, said:

Bendal Home, on 02 June 2015 - 02:02 PM, said:

Bendal Home, on 02 June 2015 - 02:02 PM, said:

Bendal Home, on 02 June 2015 - 02:01 PM, said:

Denesmet, on 02 June 2015 - 01:32 PM, said:

Lock, on 02 June 2015 - 01:29 PM, said:

Denesmet, on 02 June 2015 - 01:19 PM, said:

Lock, on 02 June 2015 - 01:06 PM, said:

Bendal home why should we lynch you?

Bendal home why should we not lynch you?

Bendal home if we don't lynch you who should we lynch?

Bendal home what is the penalty for not answering all of these questions?

The penalty is that they can't get anything the next day, no? As per the role description which they showed us.

Wow thanks there denesment or should I say Bendal homes second alt? Pretty sure I didn't ask the question of you.

So what? Bendal HAS TO reply to you anyway, so you'll get an answer from them to your pointless question.

No, I only have to if I want to be able to do something tomorrow. As per my posted PM.

Although that would require reading thread.

Something you don't like it seems.

Scummy

I find this internal dialogue suspicious. The majority of the thread is BH's and yet seems to not want to bother to read through the small number of postings that are everyone else's. BH even uses "scummy" to describe himself. I wasn't on the BH band-wagon until now...
And I don't follow the posting logic..why would the scum stop posting..this is spam central, could post nothing but useless garbage for days and it would be hard to notice..

[Fanderay]

Serc, on 02 June 2015 - 03:01 PM, said:

Fanderay, on 02 June 2015 - 02:39 PM, said:

We getting down to end of day yet? Spamming the thread is going to make it harder for us to lynch. I see your posts and skip down to someone else's.

People like Gait asking you pointless questions is not going to help us lynch.

I'm good for Gait being scummy.

No focus on teamwork at all

What is your problem with Gait?

I am down for teamwork, but I have seen no indication that anyone is trying to actually form a team.

He was the first spanner that's all. No point in me trying to accuse everyone. I think testing one of the earlier highest posters has its merit.

[Fanderay]

If BH is only card on the table I want yo see it

[Fanderay]

Spammer^

[Shadow]

Bendal Home, on 02 June 2015 - 02:01 PM, said:

No, I only have to if I want to be able to do something tomorrow. As per my posted PM.

Possible slip. BH's posted PM states that he may not win an item tomorrow if he doesnt reply. However he states that he wont be able to DO anything tomorrow.

[Tholen]

Does it have merit to get rid of a spammer on a game designed to encourage spamming? Ugh,

[Kessobahn]

Hello folks - just popping in quickly to let everyone know that I've been slammed at work this morning, so haven't had a chance to do a full read up - I should have time this afternoon to look at everything more closely, and should be able to do so before time out. Will do my best to drop a vote before time out!

[Tholen]

Hint: Awarding Roles/Items/Parodies for posting can be based on just about anything, from when people post, how they post, what they post...

Days will be 34 hours. Nights 0. In some cases something might be awarded just before time-out. Tough luck to the winner, if that's the case. They'll just have to wait until the next day/night to use it.

Bendal Home, on 02 June 2015 - 05:55 AM, said:

Now this is very interesting. Because roles are awarded based on posting. Logically the Killer and the Recruiter can only be amongst those that posted between the 8-hourly updates. I didn't. I'll make a list shortly.

This logic is flawed..so I don't think we can narrow the possible window like BH suggested here. Was this suggestion intended to confuse?

[Gait]

Tholen, on 02 June 2015 - 04:02 PM, said:

Hint: Awarding Roles/Items/Parodies for posting can be based on just about anything, from when people post, how they post, what they post...

Days will be 34 hours. Nights 0. In some cases something might be awarded just before time-out. Tough luck to the winner, if that's the case. They'll just have to wait until the next day/night to use it.

Bendal Home, on 02 June 2015 - 05:55 AM, said:

Now this is very interesting. Because roles are awarded based on posting. Logically the Killer and the Recruiter can only be amongst those that posted between the 8-hourly updates. I didn't. I'll make a list shortly.

This logic is flawed..so I don't think we can narrow the possible window like BH suggested here. Was this suggestion intended to confuse?

Well it drastically misrepresented the nature of the setup from someone who has criticised others for not reading the setup. Yes he wants us confused.

[Shadow]

Where is the logic flawed or the setup misrepresented?

[Bendal Home]

Shadow, on 02 June 2015 - 03:46 PM, said:

Bendal Home, on 02 June 2015 - 02:01 PM, said:

No, I only have to if I want to be able to do something tomorrow. As per my posted PM.

Possible slip. BH's posted PM states that he may not win an item tomorrow if he doesnt reply. However he states that he wont be able to DO anything tomorrow.

Possible retard. I don't have a role, the only thing I can try and do is get an item

[Bendal Home]

Tholen, on 02 June 2015 - 03:46 PM, said:

Does it have merit to get rid of a spammer on a game designed to encourage spamming? Ugh,

*The* spammer, please.