[Gait]

Eloth, on 02 June 2015 - 09:34 AM, said:

Gait, on 02 June 2015 - 08:56 AM, said:

Path-Shaper, on 02 June 2015 - 02:31 AM, said:

16 hours have passed on Day 1 and we have....

Roles awarded: One Cult Recruiter, Two Killer

Items awarded: None

Parodies awarded: Obsessive Compulsive has been awarded to one (1) player.

NEW ITEM AVAILABLE (any previous items not awarded are still available as well)

Giant Foam #1 Finger – When wearing this, nothing can make you betray your allegiance. Just inform PS when you wish to put it on or take it off. If you change sides at any point, you lose the Finger



ETA bold

Eloth your math seems a bit , umm, SHITE.

Seriously, anyone able to come up with any compelling reason we SHOULDN'T lynch Bendal? We know posting more = more likely to get a role, and he is the highest poster by a long shot. There have been no beneficial roles handed out yet, so we cannot lose even if we are wrong.

Yup, you're right. I completely missed that post.

What you're saying is we should vote Bendal for doing exactly what you were doing, but being better at it? I mean, sure, but then you should be next.

Yeah sure make me next that's fine, I'm sure most people must think me and bendal got those two roles. But lets get the guy who is more likely to have received one first right?

Go vote bendal home!

[Eloth]

I love mafia. As soon as someone tells me to do something I don't want to. And then I wonder if that's the point.

[Denesmet]

Bendal Home, on 02 June 2015 - 06:12 AM, said:

Gait, I hope you note how easily Obsessive Compulsive could have been portrayed as you - voting everyone, multiple votes on the same alt etc etc

Except I think PS also said at some point somewhere that some abilities might be given out for not posting as well.

[Eloth]

Denesmet, on 02 June 2015 - 10:09 AM, said:

Bendal Home, on 02 June 2015 - 06:12 AM, said:

Gait, I hope you note how easily Obsessive Compulsive could have been portrayed as you - voting everyone, multiple votes on the same alt etc etc

Except I think PS also said at some point somewhere that some abilities might be given out for not posting as well.

Yeah mafia reactions are reasonably predictable, I imagine that posting in an attempt to get any/all of the roles has been taken into account somehow.

I just know Shin's sitting in SH snickering at the idea of all of us flailing around madly in an attempt to get roles.

[Shadow]

Im not so sure that Shin would be so obvious as to give roles to the most obvious of posters especially with us simply lynching the loudest of us the last few months. Then again that really is WIFOM as he could have done it betting that we would second guess ourselves for just those reasons. That being said the thinking can be confirmed by lynching one of the two. It wouldnt be totally pointless as it could help give us a little info about whats going on. On the other hand as Denesmet highlighted roles could be handed to low posters as well and when was the last time we went on a low poster hunt D1? I need to ruminate on this a bit.

[Fanderay]

I doubt in a game designed to make us all post more he'd give it to the obvious But until SH we won't know or unless we catch one scum and analyse their previous posting habit or style.

3 scum being made and one a recruiter to boot. Definitely best option is to lynch the obvious if not to put our minds a little at ease. That's lynching one of the top 4 posters today.

[Serc]

Shadow, on 02 June 2015 - 11:46 AM, said:

Im not so sure that Shin would be so obvious as to give roles to the most obvious of posters especially with us simply lynching the loudest of us the last few months. Then again that really is WIFOM as he could have done it betting that we would second guess ourselves for just those reasons. That being said the thinking can be confirmed by lynching one of the two. It wouldnt be totally pointless as it could help give us a little info about whats going on. On the other hand as Denesmet highlighted roles could be handed to low posters as well and when was the last time we went on a low poster hunt D1? I need to ruminate on this a bit.

So which role did you get? ;]

[Shadow]

Serc, on 02 June 2015 - 12:08 PM, said:

Shadow, on 02 June 2015 - 11:46 AM, said:

Im not so sure that Shin would be so obvious as to give roles to the most obvious of posters especially with us simply lynching the loudest of us the last few months. Then again that really is WIFOM as he could have done it betting that we would second guess ourselves for just those reasons. That being said the thinking can be confirmed by lynching one of the two. It wouldnt be totally pointless as it could help give us a little info about whats going on. On the other hand as Denesmet highlighted roles could be handed to low posters as well and when was the last time we went on a low poster hunt D1? I need to ruminate on this a bit.

So which role did you get? ;]

You may now call me The Man Who Knew Too Little!!

[Shadow]

Fanderay, on 02 June 2015 - 11:59 AM, said:

I doubt in a game designed to make us all post more he'd give it to the obvious But until SH we won't know or unless we catch one scum and analyse their previous posting habit or style.

3 scum being made and one a recruiter to boot. Definitely best option is to lynch the obvious if not to put our minds a little at ease. That's lynching one of the top 4 posters today.

Yeah I have this in the back of my mind as well. Not ready to commit to it quite yet. There are a couple of comparisons I would like to make first. Probably wont do any good, but hey it certainly cant hurt.

[Path-Shaper]

A little late, but I wasn't able to post - here is your 8 hour update.

24 hours have passed on Day 1 and we have....

Roles awarded: One - Cult Recruiter, Two - Killer, Three - Item Finder

Items awarded: None

Parodies awarded: Obsessive Compulsive has been awarded to one (1) player.

Monocle and Finger are still available.

To clear up confusion, ONE Recruiter has been awarded. And ONE Killer has been awarded, not two. Sorry, I worded that poorly. ONE Item Finder has been awarded (not three).

[Denesmet]

Path-Shaper, on 02 June 2015 - 12:39 PM, said:

A little late, but I wasn't able to post - here is your 8 hour update.

24 hours have passed on Day 1 and we have....

Roles awarded: One - Cult Recruiter, Two - Killer, Three - Item Finder

Items awarded: None

Parodies awarded: Obsessive Compulsive has been awarded to one (1) player.

Monocle and Finger are still available.

To clear up confusion, ONE Recruiter has been awarded. And ONE Killer has been awarded, not two. Sorry, I worded that poorly. ONE Item Finder has been awarded (not three).

Perhaps putting it in a list would be less open to confusion on the part of the feeble-minded, like so:

The following roles have been awarded:

1) Cult Recruiter
2) Killer
3) Item Finder

[Shadow]

And so a new role is born

[Path-Shaper]

Denesmet, on 02 June 2015 - 12:44 PM, said:

Path-Shaper, on 02 June 2015 - 12:39 PM, said:

A little late, but I wasn't able to post - here is your 8 hour update.

24 hours have passed on Day 1 and we have....

Roles awarded: One - Cult Recruiter, Two - Killer, Three - Item Finder

Items awarded: None

Parodies awarded: Obsessive Compulsive has been awarded to one (1) player.

Monocle and Finger are still available.

To clear up confusion, ONE Recruiter has been awarded. And ONE Killer has been awarded, not two. Sorry, I worded that poorly. ONE Item Finder has been awarded (not three).

Perhaps putting it in a list would be less open to confusion on the part of the feeble-minded, like so:

The following roles have been awarded:

1) Cult Recruiter
2) Killer
3) Item Finder

Your insolence suggestion has been noted.

[Denesmet]

Remove Vote

Vote Kessobahn


Reasoning is that they posted relatively lots compared to most, yet have fallen silent since the awarding of roles, which mayhaps could be the symptom of a killer.

[Path-Shaper]

And in my defense, in English we have plurals. "Killer" vs "Killers".

[Denesmet]

Path-Shaper, on 02 June 2015 - 12:48 PM, said:

And in my defense, in English we have plurals. "Killer" vs "Killers".

In defence of the woefully mistaken, you have made other typos here and there, whether deliberate or not, so your lack of plurality could be explained away by their mushy brains

[Serc]

Insulting everybody at once, very nice

[Path-Shaper]

It is Day 1.
7 hours and 30 minutes left in the day.

16 players are hanging out.

BendalHome, Denesmet, Eloth, Fanderay, Gait, Grasp, Hood's Path, Kessobahn, Lock, Okaros Omtose, Serc, Silanah, Shadow, Tholen, Ultama


2 votes Bendal: Gait, Okaros
1 vote Gait: Fanderay
1 vote Kessobahn: Denesmet


Players not voting:

BendalHome, Eloth, Grasp, Hood's Path, Kessobahn, Lock, Omtose, Serc, Silanah, Shadow, Tholen, Ultama

[Lock]

Bendal home why should we lynch you?

Bendal home why should we not lynch you?

Bendal home if we don't lynch you who should we lynch?

Bendal home what is the penalty for not answering all of these questions?

[Denesmet]

Lock, on 02 June 2015 - 01:06 PM, said:

Bendal home why should we lynch you?

Bendal home why should we not lynch you?

Bendal home if we don't lynch you who should we lynch?

Bendal home what is the penalty for not answering all of these questions?

The penalty is that they can't get anything the next day, no? As per the role description which they showed us.