[Gust Hubb]

Messremb, on 01 October 2014 - 03:32 PM, said:

Khellendros, on 01 October 2014 - 02:35 PM, said:

Gust Hubb, on 01 October 2014 - 02:31 PM, said:

Context... You were Serious?

Serious is a strong word. But it's the only thing I've seen, NO ONE else has even come up with anything that close to being something resembling a copy of a photocopy of an image bearing a slight resemblance to something approaching a vote based on something dodgy someone said.

So, in that context, I'm definitely the most useful player around right now. And the only one who's placed a vote truly worthy of a tiny grain of consideration. Boom.

How about me as Domingo in Blends Timelords game?

Oh snap.

[Messremb]

A Demon Llama!, on 01 October 2014 - 03:27 PM, said:

Obdigore, on 01 October 2014 - 03:19 PM, said:

Messremb edited his post.

Time for a Modkill, imo.

So its not your honest opinion?

[co lor="#ffffff"]Vote Obdigore[/col or]

Okay, in the absence of anything else.

Remove Vote

Vote Obdigore

Because ADL may be signalling.

Edit: colour tags needed breaking

This post has been edited by Messremb: 01 October 2014 - 03:42 PM

[Gust Hubb]

Messremb, on 01 October 2014 - 03:37 PM, said:

Gust Hubb, on 01 October 2014 - 02:23 PM, said:

So, today, I would say we should lynch the players typically dangerous as scum (e.g. Khell). If he is scum, the faster we hang his silver tongue, the less likely he'll talk himself to victory. Unless someone has a better idea.

Vote Khell, with great respect and sorrow

How do you determine how dangerous someone is as scum? Is random.org or lowest poster or alphabetical a dangerous way to do it in your opinion? Or cool calculated planning?

Purely historical. What people say after a game just finished, the accumulation o grudges from numerous sources, and personal experience.

Moreover, Khell is notorious for being flexible, changing game styles frequently and with great success. Need I continue?

[HiddenOne]

please do, I'm fascinated by the insight you offer

[Gust Hubb]

Khell is a survivor. When he wants to be alive, he will talk himself out of trouble (as we see today). Plus, iirc, he has recently been congratulated on being unstoppable. The man is on his game of late and must go, for the sake of the children.

[Gust Hubb]

I still remember the unfocus khell, spamming day 1 like tatts, but with a lower likelihood of getting lynched. Now days he is more (relatively speaking) serious.

[Khellendros]

Messremb, on 01 October 2014 - 03:32 PM, said:

Khellendros, on 01 October 2014 - 02:35 PM, said:

Gust Hubb, on 01 October 2014 - 02:31 PM, said:

Context... You were Serious?

Serious is a strong word. But it's the only thing I've seen, NO ONE else has even come up with anything that close to being something resembling a copy of a photocopy of an image bearing a slight resemblance to something approaching a vote based on something dodgy someone said.

So, in that context, I'm definitely the most useful player around right now. And the only one who's placed a vote truly worthy of a tiny grain of consideration. Boom.

How about me as Domingo in Blends Timelords game?

I'm afraid this reference has gone right over my head.

[Gust Hubb]

Reference to something dodgey being said that led to a successful lynch of the bad guy.

[Khellendros]

Gust Hubb, on 01 October 2014 - 03:52 PM, said:

I still remember the unfocus khell, spamming day 1 like tatts, but with a lower likelihood of getting lynched. Now days he is more (relatively speaking) serious.

Hey, I can still be that guy! I can still be cool!

But please, tell me more about me


I'm around for another twenty minutes, then I'm off for several hours. I like my vote where it is. But if I had to choose another, it would be...*looks around*...Bubba. Deffo Bubba.

[HiddenOne]

Khell, how do you feel about the accusations made by GH?

[Khellendros]

Gust Hubb, on 01 October 2014 - 04:01 PM, said:

Reference to something dodgey being said that led to a successful lynch of the bad guy.

Ahhhh.

[Messremb]

Khellendros, on 01 October 2014 - 04:04 PM, said:

Gust Hubb, on 01 October 2014 - 04:01 PM, said:

Reference to something dodgey being said that led to a successful lynch of the bad guy.

Ahhhh.

Actually I'd better check who led the lynch then and switch my vote to them if they're playing here.

[Khellendros]

HiddenOne, on 01 October 2014 - 04:03 PM, said:

Khell, how do you feel about the accusations made by GH?

I'm flattered, but it doesn't make sense to lynch that way, as it has less than zero to do with the current game. Nothing to follow up on. Getting rid of someone because you fear they might be dangerous later on is nonsensical - a killer is dangerous from the very beginning.

I would much prefer to lynch someone based on something which has happened this game than use past history, which has no bearing on what role/non-role someone has been given this game.

[Messremb]

Khellendros, on 01 October 2014 - 04:08 PM, said:

HiddenOne, on 01 October 2014 - 04:03 PM, said:

Khell, how do you feel about the accusations made by GH?

I'm flattered, but it doesn't make sense to lynch that way, as it has less than zero to do with the current game. Nothing to follow up on. Getting rid of someone because you fear they might be dangerous later on is nonsensical - a killer is dangerous from the very beginning.

I would much prefer to lynch someone based on something which has happened this game than use past history, which has no bearing on what role/non-role someone has been given this game.

No playstyle meta you mean?

What do you see for a D1 lynch in this game then?

[Khellendros]

Messremb, on 01 October 2014 - 04:12 PM, said:

Khellendros, on 01 October 2014 - 04:08 PM, said:

HiddenOne, on 01 October 2014 - 04:03 PM, said:

Khell, how do you feel about the accusations made by GH?

I'm flattered, but it doesn't make sense to lynch that way, as it has less than zero to do with the current game. Nothing to follow up on. Getting rid of someone because you fear they might be dangerous later on is nonsensical - a killer is dangerous from the very beginning.

I would much prefer to lynch someone based on something which has happened this game than use past history, which has no bearing on what role/non-role someone has been given this game.

No playstyle meta you mean?

What do you see for a D1 lynch in this game then?

Right. I'm not saying it's not a valid way of analysis, but that's when it's still being combined with other in-game events. Which Gust's, currently, is not.


I do like Inane as a choice, for spelling out that he sure didn't get a role PM and therefore has no role whatsoever.

[Messremb]

Inane Babble, on 30 September 2014 - 10:20 PM, said:

Typical, specifically states we aren't allowed to quote our PMs then doesn't give us one anyway.



Shall we put Khell at -1 while we let today progress and see who we want to lynch just to make him sweat, as punishment for being Khell? (And also for leading my lynch last game, bastard!)

Vote Khell

Not at all for trying to put you at L-1 in his only post?

I could get behind Inane as a low poster

[Khellendros]

With only 1 post though, it's hard to judge Inane otherwise. Other options for me are Bubba and Llama, for being all middle-of-the-roady already.

[Khellendros]

Messremb, on 01 October 2014 - 04:19 PM, said:

Inane Babble, on 30 September 2014 - 10:20 PM, said:

Typical, specifically states we aren't allowed to quote our PMs then doesn't give us one anyway.



Shall we put Khell at -1 while we let today progress and see who we want to lynch just to make him sweat, as punishment for being Khell? (And also for leading my lynch last game, bastard!)

Vote Khell

Not at all for trying to put you at L-1 in his only post?

I could get behind Inane as a low poster

Honestly, nope.

Although it would be pretty funny if that post directly led to me leading his lynch yet again

[HiddenOne]

Do you feel that GH is being malicious toward you in his pursuit of your lynch or that he earnestly feels you are such a threat that you must go? I don't think he actually called you scum, right?

[Vengeance]

A Demon Llama!, on 01 October 2014 - 03:27 PM, said:

Obdigore, on 01 October 2014 - 03:19 PM, said:

Messremb edited his post.

Time for a Modkill, imo.

So its not your honest opinion?

Vote Obdigore

FYI this is not recognized by the chair as a vote.