Abyss, on 22 August 2014 - 01:54 PM, said:
The books are not entirely clear and that might be deliberate or just author omission over time, but i think that the bottom line is that potions are unreliable and having the right potion on hand for whatever presumes Harry having time to brew it, which is rarely the case.
I think that I've read somewhere that Butcher ignored them because he didn't want them to be gimmicks solving the case every time. I don't know if that is true, but it does make sense overall. Though I would like to have a better in-story explanation for that.
Quote
On a reader level, i think that Harry always having the right potion on hand for whatever would be boring, take a lot of the fun out of the books and become a tediously convenient plot device.
The point is that it doesn't have to be a right potion. It's even more realistic if he has a wrong one, or is unable to use it. But it would be nice if a grown up man prepared for emergencies.
Quote
Harry is fallible. He is very much fallible. He gets things wrong all the time, he isn't always on time, and people die. Sometimes just because they're near him. It's part of why he's such a great character... he loses, pulls his shit together, and pushes through.
But he rarely learns from those experiences enough to try a different approach. Again, better in the last few novels, but still.
Silencer, on 22 August 2014 - 01:55 PM, said:
When realistically he's not in that level of life-threatening situation very often.
What about when he becomes a number one target for vamps all over the world? And there are things from his past that he should be concerned about. Moreover, with his innate ability to make enemies out of everyone, he should have something to back up his words (basically, a 'yo mama so fat' to every monster he sees)
Quote
And to be fair, the later books do address this a bit. In that he finds himself increasingly out of his depth and militarizing accordingly.
That is why I like those books more