Alright, I've had a final read of the thread before going to bed, here are the various things which have stuck out for me.
Tattersail_, on 30 June 2014 - 01:26 PM, said:
The Unfound, on 30 June 2014 - 01:18 PM, said:
Well..once again into the breach and all that
Way to kill a thread Unfound.
KILL a thread, eh Tatts?
Inane Babble, on 30 June 2014 - 01:47 PM, said:
Someone having a hang over is no reason to vote them, you are getting awfully agressive awfully fast again
.
Them having a hang over is only a reason to hold them in utter contempt!
Tattersail_, on 30 June 2014 - 01:52 PM, said:
Inane Babble, on 30 June 2014 - 01:47 PM, said:
Someone having a hang over is no reason to vote them, you are getting awfully agressive awfully fast again
.
Them having a hang over is only a reason to hold them in utter contempt!
Defending your partner early on? I joke Inane, but mafia 101 says that you should wait for him to respond before defending him, my vote is in no way serious, but I was prodding to see how he reacted
Alright, so if the setup is as Venge said it would be, the killers aren't 'partners' in the standard sense. So this isn't really Inane defending Unfound because if they were both killers they wouldn't know each other. However, Tatts still refers to him 'jokingly' as a 'partner'. Another signal? Or is this just too blatant?
Tattersail_, on 30 June 2014 - 02:09 PM, said:
With 24 hour days we need to get as many people talking as quickly as possible and I can see the only way of doing that is having a high activity early game, Shin that was a good spot, let's lynch Inane and see his CF, he is obviously piggy backing on my great posts!
Remove Vote
Vote Inane Babble
Has Tatts realised he's being too blatant and is now trying to frantically distance, or is this yet more signalling attempts? Tatts votes for both IA and Unfound, I believe, before eventually leaving his vote elsewhere.
HiddenOne, on 30 June 2014 - 02:09 PM, said:
Shinrei, on 30 June 2014 - 02:07 PM, said:
HiddenOne, on 30 June 2014 - 02:06 PM, said:
no, there should be no rep between active players during this game
unless it's to me, and for some witty comment I make
You guys, how can I lurk just a few minutes into the game? I think you're trying to trump up a big case on me before I have a chance to utilize my random excuse generator
How rude!
Already defending himself and exceeding his normal post count by 1000%. I'm happy with my vote.
Well, I'm out of words for the day, so I'll see you all Wednesday
Moving in a different direction now...HO says goodbye for the day, except that is far from it from him. After this post HO posts quite a few more times over the course of several hours. Can't keep away?
After this there's also the possible penguin giffing as signalling to Azath, as brought up by Gust. That could be another avenue to go down.
Finally:
Sir Thursday, on 30 June 2014 - 11:02 PM, said:
OK, here's something interesting.
Khellendros shows here that he thinks the setup to be as laid out by Venge in the sign-up thread. That's fair enough, I'm making the same assumption.
Khellendros, on 30 June 2014 - 03:14 PM, said:
Actually, having asked myself this very question, it turns out that I am twice as awesome as that guy. Exactly twice.
For one thing, I have a sensibly short haircut. And just like how being a geek is now cool, sensible short is now awesome.
Also, by the by, Inane and HO are scum, Tatts is the symp. Unless we think Tatts' "stick with me kid" was just too on the nose for a signalling attempt?
But then, he feigns ignorance as to the state of the game:
Khellendros, on 30 June 2014 - 03:22 PM, said:
We've got...four days WCS. Is that right?
Given that he has clearly read the SUT (since he has an opinion that matches how Venge laid out the scum distribution there), he should know that Venge mentioned two unpaired killers each with their own kill, plus a symp. So WCS in that scenario is actually that Day 3 is D-Day (1 lynch + 2NKs per day).
So what's the deal? Is he playing dumb in the second post for some reason?
Actually I asked because my maths is infamously terrible and I wanted to check. So in fact I'd still like confirmation on that question.
So I have Tatts, Unfound, Inane, HO, Azath, and let's throw in Messremb in there too. There's also the lingering suspicion that while Tatts might be a symp, he could also be leading us down the wrong trails, such has been the apparent obviousness of the signalling, if indeed that is what it is. For that reason, I have doubts about whether to go down that route.
Hmm, HO's been asking a fair few questions of people, what do you think about this, why do say this about that. Questions but few opinions.