Posted 26 June 2014 - 05:40 PM
Hmmmm, okay, so of the 4 players that aren't me:
Liosan - I want Liosan to be scum, cause if Ampelas is scum and I've been supporting his arguments all game, I'm going to be kicking myself. The problem is that as I read through his posts, I don't see anything that jumps out at me as an obvious scum tactic, or a real slip up. He's been consistent with his cases, has been flexible with his votes, and, even though he only posted twice yesterday, the first one was still an insightful post. The only bad thing I've got on Liosan is his potential connection to HP, tenous though it may be.
Hood's Path - His voting pattern makes me suspicious of him. His potential connection to Liosan worries me. Though he's got more posts than me, I feel like those posts say a lot less than I have. His coasting style play makes me suspicious of him as well.
Ampelas - I've had Ampelas pretty firmly on the town side most of the game. His posts have made sense to me, he's been inquisitive, and usually was careful with how he was placing his vote. However, he has the fact that he and Sukul put Denul at L-2 on a potential D-Day with potentially 3 scum in the game working against him.
Sukul - If this guy is scum, I'll be very disappointed. Either way, I'd rather vote for someone who can be analyzed than someone who has spent the game posting in sentence fragments. As with Ampelas, he threw his vote at Denul yesterday without thought or worry over the potential consequences, so that IS something against him.
HP is the one that I find the most suspicious, but then who's his partner? If it's not Sukul, then it has to be one of either Liosan or Ampelas. Though I said above I was suspicious of Liosan, upon further inspection, I get more of a town vibe from Liosan than I do from Ampelas.