[Barghast]

So you have figured the whole game out.

Spoiler

 Shinrei, on 17 June 2014 - 01:53 PM, said:

There is no setting. There is no spoon. Just Killers and Town.

RI pm is simply - you are RI

A TRUE M&P GAME IS ON.

 Kaschan, on 20 June 2014 - 02:56 PM, said:

So I was going to do a huge post but there are too many quotes and GIF's from Barghast. So Im going to keep it simple and people can go look for themselves. I am operating under the assumption of 3 scum. 2 killers and 1 symp. This puts the ration at 3:1 which is typical. I have Barghast pegged and a symp and GL and SA as killers. Paired or not doesnt really matter for the assumption. Barghast has done nothing but repeatedly spam the thread with GIF's even after being asked to stop by multiple people. Once Lio and I vote for GL and SA, respectively, he commences to defending both of them and trying to undermine both of our arguments rather than putting something out there himself. Then posts a bunch of Pallid quotes after he was killed, stating " I liked his argument", but nothing else. Then states exactly what SA about me "knowing" Pallid was town and nothing else. And now we are close to end of day with basically a tie on our hands and two people who said they are willing to vote GL, including GL himself. So, am I right about all 3? I dont know. But if GL CF's scum I figure I cant be too far off. And no this doesnt absolve a couple others that have slight inconsistencies but as HP said I will bring those up later if I am still alive to do so.

Spoiler

Kaschan I apologize if you are new, but you cannot tie something in like that. If we were down to 3 players it may fit, but right now you are trying to solve the whole equation without first finding one part of it.

As you are here and talking and trying to provide an alternative universe in which for us to vote, I may just vote GL over you just yet.

edit fixed spoiler tags

This post has been edited by Barghast: 20 June 2014 - 03:05 PM

[Nimander Golit]

 Kaschan, on 20 June 2014 - 02:56 PM, said:

So I was going to do a huge post but there are too many quotes and GIF's from Barghast. So Im going to keep it simple and people can go look for themselves. I am operating under the assumption of 3 scum. 2 killers and 1 symp. This puts the ration at 3:1 which is typical. I have Barghast pegged and a symp and GL and SA as killers. Paired or not doesnt really matter for the assumption. Barghast has done nothing but repeatedly spam the thread with GIF's even after being asked to stop by multiple people. Once Lio and I vote for GL and SA, respectively, he commences to defending both of them and trying to undermine both of our arguments rather than putting something out there himself. Then posts a bunch of Pallid quotes after he was killed, stating " I liked his argument", but nothing else. Then states exactly what SA about me "knowing" Pallid was town and nothing else. And now we are close to end of day with basically a tie on our hands and two people who said they are willing to vote GL, including GL himself. So, am I right about all 3? I dont know. But if GL CF's scum I figure I cant be too far off. And no this doesnt absolve a couple others that have slight inconsistencies but as HP said I will bring those up later if I am still alive to do so.

I would be willing to switch to GL if someone could actually give me a clear idea what this 'case' everyone seems to have on him is all about! I mean, I'll switch for the lynch if I have to, but I'm going to leave it to the last minute, or as close to it as I can, in hopes that someone will clarify this for me.

[Barghast]

Nimander I think it stems from the pissing match Liosan and GL had on day one, and that they tried and failed to lynch GL day one. Then today he has done nothing to alleviate people's fears he is scum, and actually not defended the votes that are placed on him.

[Shinrei]

When Day 2 and Night 2 are over, I will freeze the timer for the weekend.

[Kaschan]

 Barghast, on 20 June 2014 - 03:05 PM, said:

So you have figured the whole game out.

Spoiler

 Shinrei, on 17 June 2014 - 01:53 PM, said:

There is no setting. There is no spoon. Just Killers and Town.

RI pm is simply - you are RI

A TRUE M&P GAME IS ON.

 Kaschan, on 20 June 2014 - 02:56 PM, said:

So I was going to do a huge post but there are too many quotes and GIF's from Barghast. So Im going to keep it simple and people can go look for themselves. I am operating under the assumption of 3 scum. 2 killers and 1 symp. This puts the ration at 3:1 which is typical. I have Barghast pegged and a symp and GL and SA as killers. Paired or not doesnt really matter for the assumption. Barghast has done nothing but repeatedly spam the thread with GIF's even after being asked to stop by multiple people. Once Lio and I vote for GL and SA, respectively, he commences to defending both of them and trying to undermine both of our arguments rather than putting something out there himself. Then posts a bunch of Pallid quotes after he was killed, stating " I liked his argument", but nothing else. Then states exactly what SA about me "knowing" Pallid was town and nothing else. And now we are close to end of day with basically a tie on our hands and two people who said they are willing to vote GL, including GL himself. So, am I right about all 3? I dont know. But if GL CF's scum I figure I cant be too far off. And no this doesnt absolve a couple others that have slight inconsistencies but as HP said I will bring those up later if I am still alive to do so.

Spoiler

Kaschan I apologize if you are new, but you cannot tie something in like that. If we were down to 3 players it may fit, but right now you are trying to solve the whole equation without first finding one part of it.

As you are here and talking and trying to provide an alternative universe in which for us to vote, I may just vote GL over you just yet.

edit fixed spoiler tags

OMFG. HP doesnt want to vote me but will to get a lynch. which until the vote actually happens means its 5 me and 5 GL. No an actual tie it isnt, but its the easiest word to understand for the situation. Somebody is going to get lynched. But as it stands we are split on who we think it should be. Sounds kind of like a tie to me

[Galayn Lord]

 Nimander Golit, on 20 June 2014 - 03:05 PM, said:

 Kaschan, on 20 June 2014 - 02:56 PM, said:

So I was going to do a huge post but there are too many quotes and GIF's from Barghast. So Im going to keep it simple and people can go look for themselves. I am operating under the assumption of 3 scum. 2 killers and 1 symp. This puts the ration at 3:1 which is typical. I have Barghast pegged and a symp and GL and SA as killers. Paired or not doesnt really matter for the assumption. Barghast has done nothing but repeatedly spam the thread with GIF's even after being asked to stop by multiple people. Once Lio and I vote for GL and SA, respectively, he commences to defending both of them and trying to undermine both of our arguments rather than putting something out there himself. Then posts a bunch of Pallid quotes after he was killed, stating " I liked his argument", but nothing else. Then states exactly what SA about me "knowing" Pallid was town and nothing else. And now we are close to end of day with basically a tie on our hands and two people who said they are willing to vote GL, including GL himself. So, am I right about all 3? I dont know. But if GL CF's scum I figure I cant be too far off. And no this doesnt absolve a couple others that have slight inconsistencies but as HP said I will bring those up later if I am still alive to do so.

I would be willing to switch to GL if someone could actually give me a clear idea what this 'case' everyone seems to have on him is all about! I mean, I'll switch for the lynch if I have to, but I'm going to leave it to the last minute, or as close to it as I can, in hopes that someone will clarify this for me.

The case seems to boil down to me "distancing" from Liosan by voting him. Since then Liosan has been voting me. How that makes sense I don't see.

[Barghast]

4 votes on each, 2 more required for a lynch Kaschan.

[Galayn Lord]

 Barghast, on 20 June 2014 - 03:09 PM, said:

Nimander I think it stems from the pissing match Liosan and GL had on day one, and that they tried and failed to lynch GL day one. Then today he has done nothing to alleviate people's fears he is scum, and actually not defended the votes that are placed on him.

There is SFA to defend against. Ergo IDGAF. You're all retarded dickwads as my RI CF will indicate.

Where are we left after then? "links" to me? People pushing the nil case on me is about all. So good luck.

[Liosan]

Whew, thought I had missed timeout for a minute there... Sorry I wasn't around much most of today, RL had to be priority, but I'm back and should be around most of today. I just read up fast and we have a really interesting tie on our hands. Voting for Kaschan are two people he has fingered as scum, with a third being the one who refused to vote GL yesterday(suspicious, given that there were only 45 minutes left and he was the only viable train)(Nimander). And today, again, he is voting against the GL train while Kaschan's train, imo, doesn't have as much basis.

@ Nimander: Look back over the thread. Pallid posted a nice recap of the case when he voted day one, and then I quoted it today. That's where people are coming from when they vote GL

[Kaschan]

 Liosan, on 20 June 2014 - 03:13 PM, said:

Whew, thought I had missed timeout for a minute there... Sorry I wasn't around much most of today, RL had to be priority, but I'm back and should be around most of today. I just read up fast and we have a really interesting tie on our hands. Voting for Kaschan are two people he has fingered as scum, with a third being the one who refused to vote GL yesterday(suspicious, given that there were only 45 minutes left and he was the only viable train)(Nimander). And today, again, he is voting against the GL train while Kaschan's train, imo, doesn't have as much basis.

@ Nimander: Look back over the thread. Pallid posted a nice recap of the case when he voted day one, and then I quoted it today. That's where people are coming from when they vote GL

Wow im sorry did you say TIE??

[Liosan]

A tie: 4-4, neither train has more votes. Yes I said tie.

[Hood's Path]

 Galayn Lord, on 17 June 2014 - 05:04 PM, said:

<snip>
Having caught some ... movies ... the tentacles are probably out of shot. Why else do you think she's smiliing?

 Galayn Lord, on 18 June 2014 - 08:59 AM, said:

<snip>
Rule 34?

 Galayn Lord, on 18 June 2014 - 11:14 AM, said:

<snip>
Having considered all the evidence (not really, I just skimmed)

Vote Hood's Path

Low posting scum.

 Galayn Lord, on 18 June 2014 - 03:12 PM, said:

<snip>
Noting the underlined, does that post by Barghast stink of signalling or is it just me that thinks so?

HP, good of you to join us.

Remove Vote

On my phone so no complicated shit from me today.

 Galayn Lord, on 18 June 2014 - 03:37 PM, said:

<snip>
Agreed, I dislike that post immeasurably. The style of judging an alt on single posts rubs me up the wrong way.

Vote Liosan

 Galayn Lord, on 18 June 2014 - 04:09 PM, said:

<snip>

Oh wow, I'm suspicious again now. Consistent aren't you.

My vote is entirely independent of Denul - I based it soley off your single post that was quoted above.

 Galayn Lord, on 18 June 2014 - 04:28 PM, said:

<snip>
Someone tell Barghast how to imbed gifs please

 Galayn Lord, on 18 June 2014 - 04:29 PM, said:

<snip>
I'm going to withhold judgement on symp/no symp. To be certain there isn't one is going to leave you open to being blindsided

 Galayn Lord, on 18 June 2014 - 04:50 PM, said:

<snip>

10 hours give or take

 Galayn Lord, on 18 June 2014 - 04:53 PM, said:

<snip>
I'm more surprised I've not been called out for voting you based soley on posting style, not content. Got something to hide or did you miss that?

 Galayn Lord, on 18 June 2014 - 05:02 PM, said:

<snip>

Or alternating kills. Sheesh we'll not know the exact setup till we're in SH. I have no real desire to discuss every possible permutation on thread but can if you really want to.

Just keep an open mind.

 Galayn Lord, on 19 June 2014 - 12:54 PM, said:

<snip>

So let me get the end of day straight. I was distancing from Liosan so Liosan votes for me and does so again today? Because that makes it any less a case of him distancing from me?

 Galayn Lord, on 19 June 2014 - 12:55 PM, said:

Oh, no there was some other aspect to it other than I'm an outside chance of a lynch rather than the two who have more votes already.

 Galayn Lord, on 19 June 2014 - 12:57 PM, said:

<snip>
This is the best of it I think I'm right in assuming?

Trying to sever Denuls hypothesized connection by voting for one of the two he suspects of having a connection, the one of the two that isn't me? Sheesh. Day 1 I know but that's a bit slim.

 Galayn Lord, on 19 June 2014 - 12:58 PM, said:

Did I miss anything?

 Galayn Lord, on 19 June 2014 - 04:16 PM, said:

<snip>

No scum would be so stupid as to say that.

 Galayn Lord, on 19 June 2014 - 04:41 PM, said:

<snip>
I could be quite tempted to drop a vote on Amp for that. Scum don't need to care who gets lynched so long as it isn't them

 Galayn Lord, on 19 June 2014 - 09:01 PM, said:

There's been nothing since. Does anyone else have any thoughts?

 Galayn Lord, on 20 June 2014 - 09:56 AM, said:

<snip>

Just to answer this point quickly whilst at a computer;

This is my phone: Nokia C3. It doesn't do tabs or multiquotes and when replying I need to delete character by character all text and formatting I want to delete. So I don't. However it does auto-align the browser window to text so following quotes is really quite easy. Does your no doubt newer and more fancy phone not do that? I can cope with it from my phone so quit bitching.

 Galayn Lord, on 20 June 2014 - 11:29 AM, said:

<snip>

Stuff that.

Vote Kaschan

With the proviso that I'll switch to myself if needed for a lynch. I'll check in again maybe 1hr/45min before timeout.

That's the totality of GL's content (stripped of the embedded quotes). Whimsical, admits he voted for somebody for 'style', seems to discount mechanism discussion but remains open to it, throws out the idea of alternating killers, points out that scum don't care who is lynched, and finally votes for the train that isn't him.

Nothing damning in there but it's much less than what Kaschan has contributed. (Yeah, yeah, I'm throwing rocks at him from my glass windowed house.)

[Kaschan]

 Liosan, on 20 June 2014 - 03:18 PM, said:

A tie: 4-4, neither train has more votes. Yes I said tie.

Just a joke Barghast basically just called me a fucktard since i used the same word for the situation

[Barghast]

Kaschan oozes newby whereas GL seems more like a veteran, and the woe is me doesn't seem to sit right with my feelings about him.

How are we going to proceed going forward? I am now leaning more towards GL especially because of his recap to Nimander

[Hood's Path]

30 more minutes?

[Nimander Golit]

Like I said, I'll vote GL if it's necessary for the lynch, but I'd just as soon not vote for him. The case against him is a load of shit, as far as I am concerned. You're all just latching on to the easy lynch for no good reason.

[Liosan]

 Barghast, on 20 June 2014 - 03:20 PM, said:

Kaschan oozes newby whereas GL seems more like a veteran, and the woe is me doesn't seem to sit right with my feelings about him.

How are we going to proceed going forward? I am now leaning more towards GL especially because of his recap to Nimander

We only have like half an hour left, and my vote's already down, so its up to you and HP I think.

[Liosan]

woops crosspost, up to you, nimander, and HP now.

[Ampelas]

I was WONDERING what the hell you were going on about there.

I am pretty sure Barghast meant "tie" in the linking together meaning, regarding the situation you describe. Not the "tie" as in equal amount of votes meaning.

[Hood's Path]

I'd much rather have a concensus than not. But since Shin is going to freeze after the lynch


Vote GL