[Rikkter]

Path-Shaper, on 31 March 2014 - 04:12 PM, said:

Galayn Lord, on 31 March 2014 - 04:09 PM, said:

Kessobahn, on 31 March 2014 - 04:03 PM, said:

I suppose you could be right. It seems ominous to me in a way, like maybe scum will get powers faster than town, based on levels, so if we blab a lot it puts us at a disadvantage.

As its Spycraft there will be some good roles either side of the fence I reckon. Do we know what TDMi the game is?

Quote

This game is relatively low in abilities, I'd label it at TMDI 2 for the first levels of the game. This rises to TMDI 7.

It is this I was thinking about...

Quote

Town roles have no abilities at level 0-4, and get a (one-time) ability at level 5.

Nothing is mentioned for level 6 and 7. So maybe town DO need to speak a lot more, as the above suggests scum already have abilities whereas town do not.

There are no levels above 5.

Ahh yes - I was wondering why I'd missed something like that

[Denul]

If there weren't so many god damned posts to sift through, I'd go dig it up.

[Lock]

Bek Okhan, on 02 April 2014 - 10:24 PM, said:

Eloth, on 02 April 2014 - 10:22 PM, said:

level 4 hit.

Just 115 away from Level 5

That's child's play.

[Ampelas]

Denul, on 02 April 2014 - 10:28 PM, said:

Rikkter, on 02 April 2014 - 10:27 PM, said:

Path-Shaper, on 31 March 2014 - 01:23 PM, said:

Town roles have no abilities at level 0-4, and get a (one-time) ability at level 5.
What scum has, is unknown. Of course.

Yeah, but I'm talking about in a later post. When he schooled us.

clarification

p-s explicitly stated there are no levels past 5

i can find the post if you really want

[Ampelas]

lol @ crosspost. man. well it's nice to see activity, we should have no problem hitting 600 today

[Denul]

Lock, on 02 April 2014 - 10:29 PM, said:

Rikkter, on 02 April 2014 - 09:42 PM, said:

Bek Okhan, on 02 April 2014 - 09:41 PM, said:

Ampelas, on 02 April 2014 - 09:37 PM, said:

oh what's up, i am the topic of discussion at the moment.

allow me to rejoinder!

GREAT! This is what we need. Yeah ok I'm reading up on early you. Rikks looking at your GL connections. we're comparing notes.

You latched on to both of our highest candidates for scum REALLY early. wanna walk us through that? what are your thoughts on Monok and maybe also Denul?

My thoughts on Denul are that if he is scum I'll be severely pissed. He got an effective bye for D1 barring GLs group hugs

So, 4 new pages or so but not much new (although good to see Amp back and contributing).

And I see that most everyone seems to be leaning Tiam or MO for lynchervating. The only post that tickled my fancy was the question by Bek. Why did you bring up Denul specifically? It just struck me as random, considering they've only posted 5 times or so.

Cause of GL's vote on me. He thinks it might have been signalling to me, like "Hey, get your act in gear, cause you're my scum leader and haven't posted anything yet and that stresses me out, bro!"

Also, boy

[Bek Okhan]

Rikkter, on 02 April 2014 - 10:26 PM, said:

Bek Okhan, on 02 April 2014 - 10:25 PM, said:

Rikkter, on 02 April 2014 - 10:24 PM, said:

Rikkter, on 02 April 2014 - 10:23 PM, said:

Ampelas, on 02 April 2014 - 10:22 PM, said:

Eloth, on 02 April 2014 - 10:22 PM, said:

level 4 hit.

why are you sad? we are hitting 5 today

Fancy 6?

Oh shit, thought. What if scum keep levelling up past 5?

how do you mean?

I mean just because we get a one-shot at l5, scum may get a nk every 2 levels or some such

Well thats not a bad thing if we think on it it'd happen sooner or later. we just need to capitalize on our use of abilities.

I'm not gonna discuss NK possibilities though. that always bites me in the ass.

[Kessobahn]

If people are starting to feel Amp is inno and MO was framed, then Tiam is the most likely bad guy, right?

[Ampelas]

Denul, on 02 April 2014 - 10:31 PM, said:

Lock, on 02 April 2014 - 10:29 PM, said:

Rikkter, on 02 April 2014 - 09:42 PM, said:

Bek Okhan, on 02 April 2014 - 09:41 PM, said:

Ampelas, on 02 April 2014 - 09:37 PM, said:

oh what's up, i am the topic of discussion at the moment.

allow me to rejoinder!

GREAT! This is what we need. Yeah ok I'm reading up on early you. Rikks looking at your GL connections. we're comparing notes.

You latched on to both of our highest candidates for scum REALLY early. wanna walk us through that? what are your thoughts on Monok and maybe also Denul?

My thoughts on Denul are that if he is scum I'll be severely pissed. He got an effective bye for D1 barring GLs group hugs

So, 4 new pages or so but not much new (although good to see Amp back and contributing).

And I see that most everyone seems to be leaning Tiam or MO for lynchervating. The only post that tickled my fancy was the question by Bek. Why did you bring up Denul specifically? It just struck me as random, considering they've only posted 5 times or so.

Cause of GL's vote on me. He thinks it might have been signalling to me, like "Hey, get your act in gear, cause you're my scum leader and haven't posted anything yet and that stresses me out, bro!"

Also, boy

yeah this is correct and actually unfortunately something you can't explain away cause you weren't around and there's nothing to defend with. its gonna stick to you cause gl was scum but that doesnt' mean that you are scum for sure, just that there is definite suspicion because of how scum (and potential scum) deliberately mentioned you more than once and even voted for you while saying "it won't matter anyway, modkill timer's almost up BUT HEY VOTE DENUL RITE GUIZE?"

[Denul]

The thing that really bugs me about Tiam as a potential lynch is would 2 scum really make the exact same mistake of overposting on thread? Unless maybe they didn't know each other?

I think the Tiam lynch is just an easy lynch, and I think it's going to cause more suspicions than anything, and that worries me.

[Denul]

Ampelas, on 02 April 2014 - 10:33 PM, said:

Denul, on 02 April 2014 - 10:31 PM, said:

Lock, on 02 April 2014 - 10:29 PM, said:

Rikkter, on 02 April 2014 - 09:42 PM, said:

Bek Okhan, on 02 April 2014 - 09:41 PM, said:

Ampelas, on 02 April 2014 - 09:37 PM, said:

oh what's up, i am the topic of discussion at the moment.

allow me to rejoinder!

GREAT! This is what we need. Yeah ok I'm reading up on early you. Rikks looking at your GL connections. we're comparing notes.

You latched on to both of our highest candidates for scum REALLY early. wanna walk us through that? what are your thoughts on Monok and maybe also Denul?

My thoughts on Denul are that if he is scum I'll be severely pissed. He got an effective bye for D1 barring GLs group hugs

So, 4 new pages or so but not much new (although good to see Amp back and contributing).

And I see that most everyone seems to be leaning Tiam or MO for lynchervating. The only post that tickled my fancy was the question by Bek. Why did you bring up Denul specifically? It just struck me as random, considering they've only posted 5 times or so.

Cause of GL's vote on me. He thinks it might have been signalling to me, like "Hey, get your act in gear, cause you're my scum leader and haven't posted anything yet and that stresses me out, bro!"

Also, boy

yeah this is correct and actually unfortunately something you can't explain away cause you weren't around and there's nothing to defend with. its gonna stick to you cause gl was scum but that doesnt' mean that you are scum for sure, just that there is definite suspicion because of how scum (and potential scum) deliberately mentioned you more than once and even voted for you while saying "it won't matter anyway, modkill timer's almost up BUT HEY VOTE DENUL RITE GUIZE?"

Thus the reason I haven't really responded to it beyond acknowledging that it's a case against me. There's nothing I can do or say about it. Such is la vie!

[Ampelas]

Denul, on 02 April 2014 - 10:35 PM, said:

The thing that really bugs me about Tiam as a potential lynch is would 2 scum really make the exact same mistake of overposting on thread? Unless maybe they didn't know each other?

I think the Tiam lynch is just an easy lynch, and I think it's going to cause more suspicions than anything, and that worries me.

this smells like derailment to me, so if you really believe this, i would like to see some supporting evidence. there is already a ton of evidence against tiam, nothing conclusive obviously, but for you to say that it's an "easy lynch" and a waste is not sufficient without support

[Ampelas]

Denul, on 02 April 2014 - 10:36 PM, said:

Ampelas, on 02 April 2014 - 10:33 PM, said:

Denul, on 02 April 2014 - 10:31 PM, said:

Lock, on 02 April 2014 - 10:29 PM, said:

Rikkter, on 02 April 2014 - 09:42 PM, said:

Bek Okhan, on 02 April 2014 - 09:41 PM, said:

Ampelas, on 02 April 2014 - 09:37 PM, said:

oh what's up, i am the topic of discussion at the moment.

allow me to rejoinder!

GREAT! This is what we need. Yeah ok I'm reading up on early you. Rikks looking at your GL connections. we're comparing notes.

You latched on to both of our highest candidates for scum REALLY early. wanna walk us through that? what are your thoughts on Monok and maybe also Denul?

My thoughts on Denul are that if he is scum I'll be severely pissed. He got an effective bye for D1 barring GLs group hugs

So, 4 new pages or so but not much new (although good to see Amp back and contributing).

And I see that most everyone seems to be leaning Tiam or MO for lynchervating. The only post that tickled my fancy was the question by Bek. Why did you bring up Denul specifically? It just struck me as random, considering they've only posted 5 times or so.

Cause of GL's vote on me. He thinks it might have been signalling to me, like "Hey, get your act in gear, cause you're my scum leader and haven't posted anything yet and that stresses me out, bro!"

Also, boy

yeah this is correct and actually unfortunately something you can't explain away cause you weren't around and there's nothing to defend with. its gonna stick to you cause gl was scum but that doesnt' mean that you are scum for sure, just that there is definite suspicion because of how scum (and potential scum) deliberately mentioned you more than once and even voted for you while saying "it won't matter anyway, modkill timer's almost up BUT HEY VOTE DENUL RITE GUIZE?"

Thus the reason I haven't really responded to it beyond acknowledging that it's a case against me. There's nothing I can do or say about it. Such is la vie!

indeed

[Bek Okhan]

Lock, on 02 April 2014 - 10:29 PM, said:

Rikkter, on 02 April 2014 - 09:42 PM, said:

Bek Okhan, on 02 April 2014 - 09:41 PM, said:

Ampelas, on 02 April 2014 - 09:37 PM, said:

oh what's up, i am the topic of discussion at the moment.

allow me to rejoinder!

GREAT! This is what we need. Yeah ok I'm reading up on early you. Rikks looking at your GL connections. we're comparing notes.

You latched on to both of our highest candidates for scum REALLY early. wanna walk us through that? what are your thoughts on Monok and maybe also Denul?

My thoughts on Denul are that if he is scum I'll be severely pissed. He got an effective bye for D1 barring GLs group hugs

So, 4 new pages or so but not much new (although good to see Amp back and contributing).

And I see that most everyone seems to be leaning Tiam or MO for lynchervating. The only post that tickled my fancy was the question by Bek. Why did you bring up Denul specifically? It just struck me as random, considering they've only posted 5 times or so.

Welcome in LOCK! yeah ok I switched analysis on denul, looked at Tiam and GL fretting over his modkill and echoing each other. also noticed the signal vote was very likely aimed at Denul himself.

His absence might have explained the lack of a night action.

Ampelas, on 02 April 2014 - 10:29 PM, said:

Denul, on 02 April 2014 - 10:25 PM, said:

Bek Okhan, on 02 April 2014 - 10:16 PM, said:

Ok Cool. Denul, hypothetical question. In your absence and sudden appearance you still havent given us your idea Day 1 strategy.

Honestly, I'm not certain. I understand the need for getting to Level 5, and I understand the desire to want to see what the killers started off with, but when it was obvious we weren't gonna make it through Day 1 without going up at least 1 level, I would have said we should try to go all out and get to Level 5 right away. Anyway, now that this seems likely for today, guess we'll see how things go after Night 2!

lame post. sorry.

Basically this aswell. Denul came in questioning the low post Day 1 and shoot for l5 Day 2. facts are Denuls appearance ties Tiam and GL in a very interesting way. if Denuls the killer they were in panic mode the instant they realized he might get a mod kill.

So I wanted peoples reads on this. I don't want to jump at conclusions but the more I look at it the screwier it looks.

[Rikkter]

Denul, on 02 April 2014 - 10:35 PM, said:

The thing that really bugs me about Tiam as a potential lynch is would 2 scum really make the exact same mistake of overposting on thread? Unless maybe they didn't know each other?

I think the Tiam lynch is just an easy lynch, and I think it's going to cause more suspicions than anything, and that worries me.

An easy lynch is about all we have hope of given we need 7 to lynch

[Ampelas]

Kessobahn, on 02 April 2014 - 09:47 PM, said:

please preface irrelevant posts with the words :IGNORE ME KESSO

so that when I am trying to catch up I won't start punching my monitor in rage, as the spam surge rises

also just fyi i will not be doing this at all ever, sorry, lol

[Ampelas]

ok i am on my way home to the beers, back soon

[Kessobahn]

nobody is going to, I understand this

[Rikkter]

Kessobahn, on 02 April 2014 - 10:41 PM, said:

nobody is going to, I understand this

Hey, I did it (once)!

[Rikkter]

Ampelas, on 02 April 2014 - 10:40 PM, said:

ok i am on my way home to the beers, back soon

Drunk mafia? I'll just open a bottle