[Lock]

Trake, on 29 October 2013 - 09:33 PM, said:

Wow, this timing is amazing

Odd that Lock wouldn't vote a different train too.

explain

[Trake]

At the moment I'm happy with my vote.

I'm absolutely good voting Fanderay too, if people are interested in going there. The consideration of whether Lock is scummy or just annoying town is a fair point, but I do still think he has been avoiding contribution (and his current activity suggests he could've been more involved).

I'd vote Ghennan to get a lynch, I've not liked his voting much, but generally he has been trying to contribute. Of the three, he'd be my last choice.

[Fanderay]

lol, hilarious xposts.

I'm torn b/w Lock and Ghennan.

Lock, because, well... Lock. And this type of play does fit into some of the more obscure symp playbooks.

Ghennan is more complicated, and I'm afraid I can't divorce myself from a certain degree of OMGUS with that one (largely because he's been pretty focused on me, ever since that one case).

I continue to refute the association accusations, which is what all these cases against me are based on. And to explain my case made on him back then, it was based on the most scummy behaviour to date (1.5 game days), where he repeatedly voted without explanation, and didn't participate much. SInce then he has defended his choices, and launched a rather focused attack on me, which I can respect, while acknowledging its wrong-headedness. His repeated misinterpretation of my behaviour, and attempts to stretch the flimsy case against me to make it more believable do ping my suspicions, but once again, I must confess a certain bias that prevents me from being fully impartial.

[Fanderay]

oh, wow. missed Lock voting while I was typing that. well, this certainly compicates things.

[Trake]

Lock, on 29 October 2013 - 09:35 PM, said:

Trake, on 29 October 2013 - 09:33 PM, said:

Wow, this timing is amazing

Odd that Lock wouldn't vote a different train too.

explain

It was a cross-post with your vote.

I was pointing out it was a bit surprising you weren't voting on another train, to give it more votes and keep other options in the running, which is a standard thing to see.

[Trake]

Fanderay, on 29 October 2013 - 09:38 PM, said:

Lock, because, well... Lock. And this type of play does fit into some of the more obscure symp playbooks.

You don't think killer though?

[Path-Shaper]

It is Day 3. 36 minutes remaining.

7 players alive: Cast, Fanderay, Ghennan, Hanas, Jalan, Lock, Trake

4 votes to lynch, 4 votes to go to night.


2 votes Lock (Trake, Jalan)
2 votes Ghennan (Hanas, Lock)
1 vote Fanderay (Ghennan)


Players not voted: Cast, Fanderay

[Lock]

Trake, on 29 October 2013 - 09:40 PM, said:

Lock, on 29 October 2013 - 09:35 PM, said:

Trake, on 29 October 2013 - 09:33 PM, said:

Wow, this timing is amazing

Odd that Lock wouldn't vote a different train too.

explain

It was a cross-post with your vote.

I was pointing out it was a bit surprising you weren't voting on another train, to give it more votes and keep other options in the running, which is a standard thing to see.

only other trains are myself, Fandy has 1, Ghennan had 1 (although I didn't realize that at the time)

[Fanderay]

Trake, on 29 October 2013 - 09:41 PM, said:

Fanderay, on 29 October 2013 - 09:38 PM, said:

Lock, because, well... Lock. And this type of play does fit into some of the more obscure symp playbooks.

You don't think killer though?

ballsy as fuck if killer. don't see the rationale in aggravating everyone else so much for no reason.

[Ghennan]

Fanderay, on 29 October 2013 - 09:38 PM, said:

lol, hilarious xposts.

I'm torn b/w Lock and Ghennan.

Lock, because, well... Lock. And this type of play does fit into some of the more obscure symp playbooks.

Ghennan is more complicated, and I'm afraid I can't divorce myself from a certain degree of OMGUS with that one (largely because he's been pretty focused on me, ever since that one case).

I continue to refute the association accusations, which is what all these cases against me are based on. And to explain my case made on him back then, it was based on the most scummy behaviour to date (1.5 game days), where he repeatedly voted without explanation, and didn't participate much. SInce then he has defended his choices, and launched a rather focused attack on me, which I can respect, while acknowledging its wrong-headedness. His repeated misinterpretation of my behaviour, and attempts to stretch the flimsy case against me to make it more believable do ping my suspicions, but once again, I must confess a certain bias that prevents me from being fully impartial.

Part of the focus on you is that really nothing else has come along. There's been a vote on me, and some sniping at Lock, and that's about it.

I do think you're stretching it though. "Repeatedly voting without explanation"? On a whole two votes, one of which was a day one vote, and the other of which came after the main suspect was modkilled?

[Trake]

Also, where the fuck is Cast.

[Fanderay]

Lock, on 29 October 2013 - 09:43 PM, said:

Trake, on 29 October 2013 - 09:40 PM, said:

Lock, on 29 October 2013 - 09:35 PM, said:

Trake, on 29 October 2013 - 09:33 PM, said:

Wow, this timing is amazing

Odd that Lock wouldn't vote a different train too.

explain

It was a cross-post with your vote.

I was pointing out it was a bit surprising you weren't voting on another train, to give it more votes and keep other options in the running, which is a standard thing to see.

only other trains are myself, Fandy has 1, Ghennan had 1 (although I didn't realize that at the time)

with 4 to lynch it don't take much...

[Trake]

Fanderay, on 29 October 2013 - 09:44 PM, said:

Trake, on 29 October 2013 - 09:41 PM, said:

Fanderay, on 29 October 2013 - 09:38 PM, said:

Lock, because, well... Lock. And this type of play does fit into some of the more obscure symp playbooks.

You don't think killer though?

ballsy as fuck if killer. don't see the rationale in aggravating everyone else so much for no reason.

See, I can see that as an argument, but it just makes me want to vote you...

[Fanderay]

Ghennan, on 29 October 2013 - 09:44 PM, said:

Fanderay, on 29 October 2013 - 09:38 PM, said:

lol, hilarious xposts.

I'm torn b/w Lock and Ghennan.

Lock, because, well... Lock. And this type of play does fit into some of the more obscure symp playbooks.

Ghennan is more complicated, and I'm afraid I can't divorce myself from a certain degree of OMGUS with that one (largely because he's been pretty focused on me, ever since that one case).

I continue to refute the association accusations, which is what all these cases against me are based on. And to explain my case made on him back then, it was based on the most scummy behaviour to date (1.5 game days), where he repeatedly voted without explanation, and didn't participate much. SInce then he has defended his choices, and launched a rather focused attack on me, which I can respect, while acknowledging its wrong-headedness. His repeated misinterpretation of my behaviour, and attempts to stretch the flimsy case against me to make it more believable do ping my suspicions, but once again, I must confess a certain bias that prevents me from being fully impartial.

Part of the focus on you is that really nothing else has come along. There's been a vote on me, and some sniping at Lock, and that's about it.

I do think you're stretching it though. "Repeatedly voting without explanation"? On a whole two votes, one of which was a day one vote, and the other of which came after the main suspect was modkilled?

yes. Which is why I keep fucking repeating "IT WAS THE BEST THING AT THE TIME"

ffs, i never said it was a strong case back then. just the best we've had at the time, other than the BS case against myself.

[Trake]

I'm not particularly wanting to vote Ghennan, given that's where my other suspects seem to be heading.

[Trake]

Do we have enough people on to lynch Fanderay?

[Fanderay]

Trake, on 29 October 2013 - 09:46 PM, said:

Fanderay, on 29 October 2013 - 09:44 PM, said:

Trake, on 29 October 2013 - 09:41 PM, said:

Fanderay, on 29 October 2013 - 09:38 PM, said:

Lock, because, well... Lock. And this type of play does fit into some of the more obscure symp playbooks.

You don't think killer though?

ballsy as fuck if killer. don't see the rationale in aggravating everyone else so much for no reason.

See, I can see that as an argument, but it just makes me want to vote you...

it's a staring contest of who makes the move to put anyone @ L-1 right now. There's probably scum just lurking to get that sweet hammer in..

[Fanderay]

we've got half an hour left. Leaving work, will prolly vote Ghennan @ L-5 min.

[Lock]

Trake, on 29 October 2013 - 09:47 PM, said:

I'm not particularly wanting to vote Ghennan, given that's where my other suspects seem to be heading.

so you don't trust Ghennan, you just avoid what your suspects are doing?

I'm not changing my vote for that

[Fanderay]

ciao, peeps