Malazan Empire: gIV Malazan Empire Eclipse - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 297 Pages +
  • « First
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

gIV Malazan Empire Eclipse R9 player order: Twelve,IH,MorCF,Tapper,Khell,D'rek,Tatts,Gnaw

#2321 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,166
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 19 November 2013 - 11:15 PM

View PostGalactic Council, on 19 November 2013 - 11:09 PM, said:

VP count. Reflects presumed losses/gains for hex possession changes in 310, 234, and 104.

Attachment Screen Shot 2013-11-19 at 6.01.57 PM.png



Hey!!!

I've got three points. You forgot my 1 point for tech now. And there will be a few more losses of hexes for you and IH from the looks of it.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

#2322 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 19 November 2013 - 11:31 PM

Round 4 Action Phase


Turn 1

Spoiler

Turn 2

Spoiler

Turn 3

Spoiler


Turn 4

Spoiler


Turn 5

Spoiler


Turn 6

Tatts - no reaction



Gnaw - No reaction

Twelve
- no reaction

IH -
no reaction

Morgoth -
Move cruisers to Arcturus

CF -
no reaction unless invaded

Tapper -
Provisionally: Influence. Flip a colony ship face up. Flip it face down for materials.

Khell - MOVE Dreadnaught to Lambda Aurigae, MOVE Cruiser to Zeta Chameleontis.

D'rek - no reaction confirmed


Turn 7


Tatts - no reaction (assumption) other than mild panic in effort to keep unstable (assumption although there is supporting evidence) Gnaw from panicking.


Gnaw - Provisional reaction
  • Upgrade interceptor blueprint by replacing missiles in blank spot with nuclear drive.
  • -17 upkeep. $0, Sc 0, Ma 7
Twelve - no reaction

IH -

Morgoth -


CF - no reaction unless invaded

Tapper -


Khell -

D'rek

This post has been edited by Galactic Council: 19 November 2013 - 11:40 PM

0

#2323 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 19 November 2013 - 11:32 PM

View Posttwelve, on 19 November 2013 - 11:15 PM, said:

View PostGalactic Council, on 19 November 2013 - 11:09 PM, said:

VP count. Reflects presumed losses/gains for hex possession changes in 310, 234, and 104.

Attachment Screen Shot 2013-11-19 at 6.01.57 PM.png



Hey!!!

I've got three points. You forgot my 1 point for tech now. And there will be a few more losses of hexes for you and IH from the looks of it.


Thank you. Had forgotten those. Fixed now.
0

#2324 User is offline   Khellendros 

  • Saboteur of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 7,298
  • Joined: 14-August 07

Posted 19 November 2013 - 11:36 PM

Isn't your provisional two moves, Gnaw? Thought you could only do one move in a reaction.
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
0

#2325 User is offline   Gnaw 

  • Recovering eating disordered addict of HHM
  • View gallery
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 5,966
  • Joined: 16-June 12

Posted 19 November 2013 - 11:41 PM

View PostKhellendros, on 19 November 2013 - 11:36 PM, said:

Isn't your provisional two moves, Gnaw? Thought you could only do one move in a reaction.


You're right. Copy/paste error. Fixed now.
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
0

#2326 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 19 November 2013 - 11:44 PM

I'm not going to do a reaction.

EDIT: also you are forgetting D'reks shrine vp in the vp totals
0

#2327 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,166
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 19 November 2013 - 11:53 PM

Looks like we are back to Tapper as Morgoth provisionally passed.

Tapper I think you and Khell should pass. Trap Gnaw's ships with your Dread.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

#2328 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 19 November 2013 - 11:54 PM

Action 4 battles so far

381

Khell vs cubes. (nukes present)

310

Tatts vs cubes. (nukes present)

234

IH vs Twelve (nukes present)

230

Khell vs IH (nukes present)


206

Gnaw vs Tapper (nukes present)


104a

Morgy vs Gnaw (nukes present)


104b

Morgy vs Ancients (nukes present)

0

#2329 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 19 November 2013 - 11:56 PM

View Posttwelve, on 19 November 2013 - 11:53 PM, said:

Looks like we are back to Tapper as Morgoth provisionally passed.

Tapper I think you and Khell should pass. Trap Gnaw's ships with your Dread.


Tatts' provisional requires confirmation.
0

#2330 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,166
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 20 November 2013 - 12:01 AM

Don't forget that my battles include my orbitals not that it matters much as they have zero inititive or computers.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

#2331 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,166
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 20 November 2013 - 12:02 AM

Why does Tatts need confirmation? Nothing changed before him that would warrant any further reaction from him as far as I can tell.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

#2332 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,166
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 20 November 2013 - 12:05 AM

I should react after your reaction Gnaw and put a plasma Cannon onto my orbitals.

What would that do to my odds of winning against Tatts? Two hits and I could win that battle. And Tatts need three......
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

#2333 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,166
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 20 November 2013 - 12:07 AM

Hold One just a second. Tatts only has an electron computer on his Dread. Can someone run the odds with Tatts Blueprint against my orbital with the Ion turret and a plasma cannon?
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

#2334 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,166
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 20 November 2013 - 12:08 AM

Or my ion turret with an electron computer? Though I think my odds might be better with the extra cannon.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

#2335 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,166
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 20 November 2013 - 12:20 AM

Damn Simulator won't work on my work internet. Can someone run it for me? What are the odds of coming out with a victory? If it's around 40% I might just do it.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

#2336 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 20 November 2013 - 12:24 AM

I ran the odds of various blueprints before I attacked, I think the best odds I saw for you were 25%, can't remember which ones I ran, but pretty sure I'd have run plasma cannon.
0

#2337 User is offline   Khellendros 

  • Saboteur of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 7,298
  • Joined: 14-August 07

Posted 20 November 2013 - 12:24 AM

I'm here, I'll just have a go now.
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
0

#2338 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,166
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 20 November 2013 - 12:28 AM

View PostImperial Historian, on 20 November 2013 - 12:24 AM, said:

I ran the odds of various blueprints before I attacked, I think the best odds I saw for you were 25%, can't remember which ones I ran, but pretty sure I'd have run plasma cannon.



Against you I know I'm screwed but what are my odds against Tatts? His dread has 4 HP +1 computers with two ion cannons. Odds say on average he should take 4 rounds to kill me. Odds say I should land two hits if I live to shoot in the fourth round. If those two hits are with the plasma cannon I win but chances are I won't. I'm probably looking at 33% against Tatts.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

#2339 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,166
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 20 November 2013 - 12:29 AM

Fuck it I'll save my actions for when I greatly improve my chance of success.

No reaction again.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

#2340 User is offline   Khellendros 

  • Saboteur of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 7,298
  • Joined: 14-August 07

Posted 20 November 2013 - 12:29 AM

View Posttwelve, on 20 November 2013 - 12:07 AM, said:

Hold One just a second. Tatts only has an electron computer on his Dread. Can someone run the odds with Tatts Blueprint against my orbital with the Ion turret and a plasma cannon?



For this you get 27% odds.
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
0

Share this topic:


  • 297 Pages +
  • « First
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

7 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 7 guests, 0 anonymous users