[Lock]

Jalan, on 27 August 2013 - 12:46 PM, said:

Lock, on 27 August 2013 - 06:04 AM, said:

Fanderay, on 27 August 2013 - 05:41 AM, said:

Is it just me or do people seem way cozy with each other andi very willing to work to get themselves elected mayor? Hmmmm seems like a very familiar senario as yesterday. Why did that make me look uber suspicious but noone else is batting an eye when others do it?

Kettle Pot Black anyone?

Frankly I think we need a lynch if for no otehr reason than to keep the total people lynchable by a Judge to a minimum. I'd be willing to throw my vote in if it means we can get a lynch and the Judge candidate is acceptable to me. I would really like to have some time to look at who was stating they were okay about letting the lynches build up every couple of days. I think one of those people should be lynched but alas I just don't ahve the time to dig back through the posts to find out who they were. According to Jalan it wasn't him.

Hopefully someone can take a look at that for me. Hell I would seriously consider throwing my vote their way for mayor if they did.

For now I'm out for the night.

(3)

I think you are perfectly right with this line of thought. There's no reason to trust me or anyone, but we do agree that we need a lynch this time, which does mean we need a mayor. That's why I have went about this entire scenario the best way I think possible. I spent resources voting myself, and opening a comm to ask for support. I put myself out there for scrutiny. I have to reveal much more than players only having to vote, and much much more than those not voting at all. I am forced to compromise with players who could be friend or for, and select a judge who doesn't even have to tell the truth about whom he chooses to lynch. Right now, I'm even having to lean towards Grasp, even though I'd prefer Demelain not be one of the lynchees, but as Mayor, I won't have my way entirely. I've tried to make it as clear as possible that I'll choose a judge that, so far, every single player agrees with. If I screw this up, I doubt I'll be able to be Mayor again, and even placed on some lists I'd rather not be on.

My gain? The XP. I want it, and think it is worth gaining, as I am limited in other ways to gain XP. If I conduct this well, and hold my word, maybe I garner trust for future Mayor or Judge candidate. Mostly, because we got nowhere yesterday, and if someone doesnt step up, I don't see us getting anywhere again.

Can you really find fault in my method so far? The only main fact is who ends up lynched, and I'm being as open as possible to all notions, while at the same time showing loyalty to those already vouching for me.

I like your input, but not the fact that you have posted and bailed. I have been as open-minded to nearly everyone this day, but I don't really like the tone of this post, Fanderay. You either skimmed over the last page, or are missing something. I think I've done about as well a job as possible so far. Who would you like as lynchees?

(0)

You act as if you are the only one to push an election today when I spent the first third of the day doing just that. But hey, who cares right, nothing I have to say actually matters or is worth reading or paying attention to.

[2]

I didn't mean to imply this. I'm just providing an option, while trying to please as many players as possible. I figure it would be the best route to reaching a lynch today, and not letting it role over again. If not enough people can get behind me, I'm willing to change my vote and support someone who will be successful. I tried.

(0)

[Barghast]

Vote Lock

[0]

[Grasp]

Lock, on 27 August 2013 - 12:54 PM, said:

It's not a situation I'd prefer to be in, but I'm really trying to compromise with many different players. Hentos was a very popular choice for lynchee. I could either refuse to place him on the docket, and still be trying to find the best choice for judge, or make the tough decision and try to please the highest number of players. I was hoping to be able to keep your support, and kept in mind your saying you wouldn't want Merrid on the docket, thus no Demelain. I wasn't left with many other options as only a handful of players had made it public knowledge their choices for lynchees.

Is this not acceptable? I stayed as close to the desires made by you, grasp, and anyone else being vocal as possible.

(0)

Not really...

When I voted for you, it was because you were going to pick a judge that would result in either a lynch of Hanas and Bek, or else a lynch of Hanas and Demelain. Hentos and Fanderay isn't anywhere close to that.


So I will counter with this:

My Judge choice submission was Meanas. Meanas says he would lynch Hanas and Demelain, I think?

Ergo here's two current choices of mayor+judge+lynch:


Lock -> Cast -> Hentos Ilm and Fanderay

OR

Grasp -> Meanas -> Hanas and Demelain


There's other options out there, but I think everyone can maybe find at least one of these options agreeable? Then we've got two trains with very different lynch choices, everyone should vote for whichever they would prefer.

Sound good?

edit: [2]

This post has been edited by Grasp: 27 August 2013 - 01:04 PM

[Grasp]

Lock, on 27 August 2013 - 12:59 PM, said:

Jalan, on 27 August 2013 - 12:46 PM, said:

Lock, on 27 August 2013 - 06:04 AM, said:

Fanderay, on 27 August 2013 - 05:41 AM, said:

Is it just me or do people seem way cozy with each other andi very willing to work to get themselves elected mayor? Hmmmm seems like a very familiar senario as yesterday. Why did that make me look uber suspicious but noone else is batting an eye when others do it?

Kettle Pot Black anyone?

Frankly I think we need a lynch if for no otehr reason than to keep the total people lynchable by a Judge to a minimum. I'd be willing to throw my vote in if it means we can get a lynch and the Judge candidate is acceptable to me. I would really like to have some time to look at who was stating they were okay about letting the lynches build up every couple of days. I think one of those people should be lynched but alas I just don't ahve the time to dig back through the posts to find out who they were. According to Jalan it wasn't him.

Hopefully someone can take a look at that for me. Hell I would seriously consider throwing my vote their way for mayor if they did.

For now I'm out for the night.

(3)

I think you are perfectly right with this line of thought. There's no reason to trust me or anyone, but we do agree that we need a lynch this time, which does mean we need a mayor. That's why I have went about this entire scenario the best way I think possible. I spent resources voting myself, and opening a comm to ask for support. I put myself out there for scrutiny. I have to reveal much more than players only having to vote, and much much more than those not voting at all. I am forced to compromise with players who could be friend or for, and select a judge who doesn't even have to tell the truth about whom he chooses to lynch. Right now, I'm even having to lean towards Grasp, even though I'd prefer Demelain not be one of the lynchees, but as Mayor, I won't have my way entirely. I've tried to make it as clear as possible that I'll choose a judge that, so far, every single player agrees with. If I screw this up, I doubt I'll be able to be Mayor again, and even placed on some lists I'd rather not be on.

My gain? The XP. I want it, and think it is worth gaining, as I am limited in other ways to gain XP. If I conduct this well, and hold my word, maybe I garner trust for future Mayor or Judge candidate. Mostly, because we got nowhere yesterday, and if someone doesnt step up, I don't see us getting anywhere again.

Can you really find fault in my method so far? The only main fact is who ends up lynched, and I'm being as open as possible to all notions, while at the same time showing loyalty to those already vouching for me.

I like your input, but not the fact that you have posted and bailed. I have been as open-minded to nearly everyone this day, but I don't really like the tone of this post, Fanderay. You either skimmed over the last page, or are missing something. I think I've done about as well a job as possible so far. Who would you like as lynchees?

(0)

You act as if you are the only one to push an election today when I spent the first third of the day doing just that. But hey, who cares right, nothing I have to say actually matters or is worth reading or paying attention to.

[2]

I didn't mean to imply this. I'm just providing an option, while trying to please as many players as possible. I figure it would be the best route to reaching a lynch today, and not letting it role over again. If not enough people can get behind me, I'm willing to change my vote and support someone who will be successful. I tried.

(0)

Going back on your word from what you were promising earlier isn't really going to please as many players as possible, though. I think it's a pretty bad policy/habit to start overall, actually.

[2]

[Jalan]

Grasp, on 27 August 2013 - 01:02 PM, said:

Lock, on 27 August 2013 - 12:54 PM, said:

It's not a situation I'd prefer to be in, but I'm really trying to compromise with many different players. Hentos was a very popular choice for lynchee. I could either refuse to place him on the docket, and still be trying to find the best choice for judge, or make the tough decision and try to please the highest number of players. I was hoping to be able to keep your support, and kept in mind your saying you wouldn't want Merrid on the docket, thus no Demelain. I wasn't left with many other options as only a handful of players had made it public knowledge their choices for lynchees.

Is this not acceptable? I stayed as close to the desires made by you, grasp, and anyone else being vocal as possible.

(0)

Not really...

When I voted for you, it was because you were going to pick a judge that would result in either a lynch of Hanas and Bek, or else a lynch of Hanas and Demelain. Hentos and Fanderay isn't anywhere close to that.


So I will counter with this:

My Judge choice submission was Meanas. Meanas says he would lynch Hanas and Demelain, I think?

Ergo here's two current choices of mayor+judge+lynch:


Lock -> Cast -> Hentos Ilm and Fanderay

OR

Grasp -> Meanas -> Hanas and Demelain


There's other options out there, but I think everyone can maybe find at least one of these options agreeable? Then we've got two trains with very different lynch choices, everyone should vote for whichever they would prefer.

Sound good?

edit: [2]

This is just asking for a split train, with no one having any bullets left to change their vote.


[2]

[Grasp]

Jalan, on 27 August 2013 - 01:04 PM, said:

This is just asking for a split train, with no one having any bullets left to change their vote.


[2]

Lots of people have enough bullets to switch if they want to. Like you and me!

I would like to get confirmation from Meanas that those are his lynch choices, but I think it's a fair notion to propose the split instead of we must all blindly follow Lock when he keeps changing his target choices.

[2]

[Bek Okhan]

Split train or no, I am not in favor of electing Lock if he's just going to change his mind based on two people showing up.

It's also got me in the awkward position of having to support a lynch of either of Demelain or Fanderay, and both were lovely conversationalists yesterday

[1]

[Meanas]

Grasp, on 27 August 2013 - 01:07 PM, said:

Jalan, on 27 August 2013 - 01:04 PM, said:

This is just asking for a split train, with no one having any bullets left to change their vote.


[2]

Lots of people have enough bullets to switch if they want to. Like you and me!

I would like to get confirmation from Meanas that those are his lynch choices, but I think it's a fair notion to propose the split instead of we must all blindly follow Lock when he keeps changing his target choices.

[2]

yes, my choices are locked. Hanas + Demelain.

just got to work, may be afk for a bit.

[2]

[Barghast]

Grasp, on 27 August 2013 - 01:07 PM, said:

Jalan, on 27 August 2013 - 01:04 PM, said:

This is just asking for a split train, with no one having any bullets left to change their vote.


[2]

Lots of people have enough bullets to switch if they want to. Like you and me!

I would like to get confirmation from Meanas that those are his lynch choices, but I think it's a fair notion to propose the split instead of we must all blindly follow Lock when he keeps changing his target choices.

[2]

I point you in the direction of this post:

Lock, on 27 August 2013 - 12:31 PM, said:

Therefore, given the PS deadline, I submitted Cast as choice for Judge, as his saying he'd choose to lynch Fanderay and Hentos would please the most players. If I maintain the current votes, and gain Barghast, Cast, Nimander, Demelain, Bek, Meanas, and Denul, we would have enough support.

Thoughts? This is the most likely choice for getting the most votes, in my opinion. If this doesn't suffice, I'm out of ideas.

(0)

That isn't changing his mind, that is submitted. As Cast has now confirmed his choices are in I put a vote down, as I said I would once choices were confirmed.

[0]

[Grasp]

I suppose the alternative to splitting the train would be Lock could go back to what he was proposing before, making it unnecessary for anyone to remove votes. A few people will obviously not want to vote for him then, but that's going to happen no matter what and splitting the train would probably be a more lynch-likeliness-reducing effect.

[2]

[Barghast]

Grasp, on 27 August 2013 - 01:15 PM, said:

I suppose the alternative to splitting the train would be Lock could go back to what he was proposing before, making it unnecessary for anyone to remove votes. A few people will obviously not want to vote for him then, but that's going to happen no matter what and splitting the train would probably be a more lynch-likeliness-reducing effect.

[2]

You know RNVP should have been called 3 hours ago, as do I by PS's timescale so something has come up that is keeping it from being posted. Now I'm playing as if it has been called because timeline wise* as far as I am concerned it has been called. Choices are locked as far as I'm concerned and all bets are over.



*Yes, I know, timeline, ME and all, but this isn't SE, it is Tapper!

[0]

[Grasp]

Barghast, on 27 August 2013 - 01:14 PM, said:

Grasp, on 27 August 2013 - 01:07 PM, said:

Jalan, on 27 August 2013 - 01:04 PM, said:

This is just asking for a split train, with no one having any bullets left to change their vote.


[2]

Lots of people have enough bullets to switch if they want to. Like you and me!

I would like to get confirmation from Meanas that those are his lynch choices, but I think it's a fair notion to propose the split instead of we must all blindly follow Lock when he keeps changing his target choices.

[2]

I point you in the direction of this post:

Lock, on 27 August 2013 - 12:31 PM, said:

Therefore, given the PS deadline, I submitted Cast as choice for Judge, as his saying he'd choose to lynch Fanderay and Hentos would please the most players. If I maintain the current votes, and gain Barghast, Cast, Nimander, Demelain, Bek, Meanas, and Denul, we would have enough support.

Thoughts? This is the most likely choice for getting the most votes, in my opinion. If this doesn't suffice, I'm out of ideas.

(0)

That isn't changing his mind, that is submitted. As Cast has now confirmed his choices are in I put a vote down, as I said I would once choices were confirmed.

[0]

It seems like it to me. At the time when I voted, Lock was saying:

Lock, on 27 August 2013 - 04:36 AM, said:

Well, if I'm mayor I can choose Grasp as judge and lynch Demelain and Hanas. I'm ok with this if we don't hear from Demelain, as he was one of my supporters yesterday. If he doesn't show, then it won't matter.

Hanas is just as good a choice as anyone else, in my opinion.

and while he was talking about having an alternative choice, now he seems to be flat-out deciding that the alternative is completely solid and dismissing the original lynch choices that were why I voted for him.

[2]

[Grasp]

Barghast, on 27 August 2013 - 01:18 PM, said:

Grasp, on 27 August 2013 - 01:15 PM, said:

I suppose the alternative to splitting the train would be Lock could go back to what he was proposing before, making it unnecessary for anyone to remove votes. A few people will obviously not want to vote for him then, but that's going to happen no matter what and splitting the train would probably be a more lynch-likeliness-reducing effect.

[2]

You know RNVP should have been called 3 hours ago, as do I by PS's timescale so something has come up that is keeping it from being posted. Now I'm playing as if it has been called because timeline wise* as far as I am concerned it has been called. Choices are locked as far as I'm concerned and all bets are over.



*Yes, I know, timeline, ME and all, but this isn't SE, it is Tapper!

[0]

Lock only really started talking about switching to Cast -> Fanderay+Hentos very recently, so if that is so shouldn't his choice submissions be the old ones and this is all moot then?

Then again, the OP says judge+lynch choices have to be in by RNVP, but does it say they cannot be changed after that?

edit: [2]

This post has been edited by Grasp: 27 August 2013 - 01:20 PM

[Lock]

Grasp, on 27 August 2013 - 01:04 PM, said:

Lock, on 27 August 2013 - 12:59 PM, said:

Jalan, on 27 August 2013 - 12:46 PM, said:

Lock, on 27 August 2013 - 06:04 AM, said:

Fanderay, on 27 August 2013 - 05:41 AM, said:

Is it just me or do people seem way cozy with each other andi very willing to work to get themselves elected mayor? Hmmmm seems like a very familiar senario as yesterday. Why did that make me look uber suspicious but noone else is batting an eye when others do it?

Kettle Pot Black anyone?

Frankly I think we need a lynch if for no otehr reason than to keep the total people lynchable by a Judge to a minimum. I'd be willing to throw my vote in if it means we can get a lynch and the Judge candidate is acceptable to me. I would really like to have some time to look at who was stating they were okay about letting the lynches build up every couple of days. I think one of those people should be lynched but alas I just don't ahve the time to dig back through the posts to find out who they were. According to Jalan it wasn't him.

Hopefully someone can take a look at that for me. Hell I would seriously consider throwing my vote their way for mayor if they did.

For now I'm out for the night.

(3)

I think you are perfectly right with this line of thought. There's no reason to trust me or anyone, but we do agree that we need a lynch this time, which does mean we need a mayor. That's why I have went about this entire scenario the best way I think possible. I spent resources voting myself, and opening a comm to ask for support. I put myself out there for scrutiny. I have to reveal much more than players only having to vote, and much much more than those not voting at all. I am forced to compromise with players who could be friend or for, and select a judge who doesn't even have to tell the truth about whom he chooses to lynch. Right now, I'm even having to lean towards Grasp, even though I'd prefer Demelain not be one of the lynchees, but as Mayor, I won't have my way entirely. I've tried to make it as clear as possible that I'll choose a judge that, so far, every single player agrees with. If I screw this up, I doubt I'll be able to be Mayor again, and even placed on some lists I'd rather not be on.

My gain? The XP. I want it, and think it is worth gaining, as I am limited in other ways to gain XP. If I conduct this well, and hold my word, maybe I garner trust for future Mayor or Judge candidate. Mostly, because we got nowhere yesterday, and if someone doesnt step up, I don't see us getting anywhere again.

Can you really find fault in my method so far? The only main fact is who ends up lynched, and I'm being as open as possible to all notions, while at the same time showing loyalty to those already vouching for me.

I like your input, but not the fact that you have posted and bailed. I have been as open-minded to nearly everyone this day, but I don't really like the tone of this post, Fanderay. You either skimmed over the last page, or are missing something. I think I've done about as well a job as possible so far. Who would you like as lynchees?

(0)

You act as if you are the only one to push an election today when I spent the first third of the day doing just that. But hey, who cares right, nothing I have to say actually matters or is worth reading or paying attention to.

[2]

I didn't mean to imply this. I'm just providing an option, while trying to please as many players as possible. I figure it would be the best route to reaching a lynch today, and not letting it role over again. If not enough people can get behind me, I'm willing to change my vote and support someone who will be successful. I tried.

(0)

Going back on your word from what you were promising earlier isn't really going to please as many players as possible, though. I think it's a pretty bad policy/habit to start overall, actually.

[2]

Again, I didn't mean for it to come across this way. That's why I went with two choices you'd mentioned as possible alternatives. I was trying to keep everyone happy. I understand if you want to change votes. I hope you don't view it as going back on my word. I'm not trying to deceive anyone. I've been as forthcoming as possible with all my intentions. Apologies.

(0)

[Meanas]

Grasp, on 27 August 2013 - 01:20 PM, said:

Barghast, on 27 August 2013 - 01:18 PM, said:

Grasp, on 27 August 2013 - 01:15 PM, said:

I suppose the alternative to splitting the train would be Lock could go back to what he was proposing before, making it unnecessary for anyone to remove votes. A few people will obviously not want to vote for him then, but that's going to happen no matter what and splitting the train would probably be a more lynch-likeliness-reducing effect.

[2]

You know RNVP should have been called 3 hours ago, as do I by PS's timescale so something has come up that is keeping it from being posted. Now I'm playing as if it has been called because timeline wise* as far as I am concerned it has been called. Choices are locked as far as I'm concerned and all bets are over.



*Yes, I know, timeline, ME and all, but this isn't SE, it is Tapper!

[0]

Lock only really started talking about switching to Cast -> Fanderay+Hentos very recently, so if that is so shouldn't his choice submissions be the old ones and this is all moot then?

Then again, the OP says judge+lynch choices have to be in by RNVP, but does it say they cannot be changed after that?

edit: [2]

It can be changed--the latest is once you log in after RNVP was announced. which it technically hasn't been. Yet.

[2]

[Grasp]

Lock, on 27 August 2013 - 01:20 PM, said:

Grasp, on 27 August 2013 - 01:04 PM, said:

Lock, on 27 August 2013 - 12:59 PM, said:

Jalan, on 27 August 2013 - 12:46 PM, said:

Lock, on 27 August 2013 - 06:04 AM, said:

Fanderay, on 27 August 2013 - 05:41 AM, said:

Is it just me or do people seem way cozy with each other andi very willing to work to get themselves elected mayor? Hmmmm seems like a very familiar senario as yesterday. Why did that make me look uber suspicious but noone else is batting an eye when others do it?

Kettle Pot Black anyone?

Frankly I think we need a lynch if for no otehr reason than to keep the total people lynchable by a Judge to a minimum. I'd be willing to throw my vote in if it means we can get a lynch and the Judge candidate is acceptable to me. I would really like to have some time to look at who was stating they were okay about letting the lynches build up every couple of days. I think one of those people should be lynched but alas I just don't ahve the time to dig back through the posts to find out who they were. According to Jalan it wasn't him.

Hopefully someone can take a look at that for me. Hell I would seriously consider throwing my vote their way for mayor if they did.

For now I'm out for the night.

(3)

I think you are perfectly right with this line of thought. There's no reason to trust me or anyone, but we do agree that we need a lynch this time, which does mean we need a mayor. That's why I have went about this entire scenario the best way I think possible. I spent resources voting myself, and opening a comm to ask for support. I put myself out there for scrutiny. I have to reveal much more than players only having to vote, and much much more than those not voting at all. I am forced to compromise with players who could be friend or for, and select a judge who doesn't even have to tell the truth about whom he chooses to lynch. Right now, I'm even having to lean towards Grasp, even though I'd prefer Demelain not be one of the lynchees, but as Mayor, I won't have my way entirely. I've tried to make it as clear as possible that I'll choose a judge that, so far, every single player agrees with. If I screw this up, I doubt I'll be able to be Mayor again, and even placed on some lists I'd rather not be on.

My gain? The XP. I want it, and think it is worth gaining, as I am limited in other ways to gain XP. If I conduct this well, and hold my word, maybe I garner trust for future Mayor or Judge candidate. Mostly, because we got nowhere yesterday, and if someone doesnt step up, I don't see us getting anywhere again.

Can you really find fault in my method so far? The only main fact is who ends up lynched, and I'm being as open as possible to all notions, while at the same time showing loyalty to those already vouching for me.

I like your input, but not the fact that you have posted and bailed. I have been as open-minded to nearly everyone this day, but I don't really like the tone of this post, Fanderay. You either skimmed over the last page, or are missing something. I think I've done about as well a job as possible so far. Who would you like as lynchees?

(0)

You act as if you are the only one to push an election today when I spent the first third of the day doing just that. But hey, who cares right, nothing I have to say actually matters or is worth reading or paying attention to.

[2]

I didn't mean to imply this. I'm just providing an option, while trying to please as many players as possible. I figure it would be the best route to reaching a lynch today, and not letting it role over again. If not enough people can get behind me, I'm willing to change my vote and support someone who will be successful. I tried.

(0)

Going back on your word from what you were promising earlier isn't really going to please as many players as possible, though. I think it's a pretty bad policy/habit to start overall, actually.

[2]

Again, I didn't mean for it to come across this way. That's why I went with two choices you'd mentioned as possible alternatives. I was trying to keep everyone happy. I understand if you want to change votes. I hope you don't view it as going back on my word. I'm not trying to deceive anyone. I've been as forthcoming as possible with all my intentions. Apologies.

(0)

I'd just rather you spout some cajones and not flip flop around for votes. Whatever choice you pick of lynches, not everyone is going to agree with you obviously. But if you change your mind you seem untrustworthy and no one wants to vote you. You and anyone who runs for mayor or judge in the future would be better off sticking to your guns, and if the haters gonna hate they can start their own alternate train rather than just whining to you to change picks.

[2]

[Demelain]

I don't Grasp to become Mayor/Judge under any circumstances, so:

Vote Lock


Although I still don't like lynching Fanderay without also killing Merrid.


[0]

[Lock]

Grasp, on 27 August 2013 - 05:18 AM, said:

Bedtime for me too!

I think the votes are at 2 for Lock and none others right now? And we're still looking at possible alternatives to Hanas and Demelain for Meanas to be Judge of. I'd suggest looking at Nimander and Hentos - both seem pretty low-posting and fairly low-content, and the fact that they both have been on but haven't even really said if they would vote, let alone put down a vote since they probably won't be back online again, leaves me pretty suspicious of 'em and could make them good alternate target choices.

Will follow-up on that tomorrow if no one else does.

Night!

[2]

This is what confused me, Grasp. I thought you were saying you were ok with these alternatives. I wouldn't have considered without this post. I didn't pull Hentos and Fanderay out of thin air. I just figured that these were ok alternatives for you, and with Cast, Nimander, and Demelain all agreeing with Hentos, it felt like the best choice.

My choices were
You(Grasp) -> Hanas and Demelain
Cast -> Hentos and Fanderay
Nimander -> Hentos or Hanas and Fanderay
Demelain -> Merrid and Hentos or Hanas

Meanas didn't want Merrid, so didn't go with Demelain. Nimander mentioned 3 choices, and Cast specified two. I felt Cast would have been ok with you and Meanas, as well as be able to get new votes.

I didn't mean to come across as going back on my word. Much apologies.

(0)

[Hentos Ilm]

Grasp, on 27 August 2013 - 05:18 AM, said:

Bedtime for me too!

I think the votes are at 2 for Lock and none others right now? And we're still looking at possible alternatives to Hanas and Demelain for Meanas to be Judge of. I'd suggest looking at Nimander and Hentos - both seem pretty low-posting and fairly low-content, and the fact that they both have been on but haven't even really said if they would vote, let alone put down a vote since they probably won't be back online again, leaves me pretty suspicious of 'em and could make them good alternate target choices.

Will follow-up on that tomorrow if no one else does.

Night!

[2]

Wow, everyone hating on me for some reason. Because I'm quiet? In a faction game? That's really ridiculous. Anyway, after talking with Lock I trust him to try not to get me lynched today. So he gets my vote. On the slim chance that I'm elected judge my Lynch submissions are Hanas and Merrid. Hanas because more people hate him than even me and Merrid because of just about everything that happened day 1.
vote Lock

Edit: [1]

This post has been edited by Hentos Ilm: 27 August 2013 - 01:51 PM

[Cast]

Wow, maybe because you are quiet and do not read up.

(2)