Korbas, on 03 July 2013 - 03:20 PM, said:
Trake, on 03 July 2013 - 03:17 PM, said:
As such, I'll be voting Barghast again.
Edit: to correct the bold
Defense of two people? Do you know something we don't? I don't think I have defended one other person this game. I don't know my team. Lone wolf me. I can see why you believe I am FA but Mockra? I don't see how you can know what you think he meant?
I don't think either case is particularly valuable; I was willing to lynch Fener for what could have been a slip on Day One, but was probably not, but it's not Day One any more. Thus, I'm not going to vote Mockra on similarly tenuous evidence, or at least, not without him showing up to defend himself first.
Believing you isn't hard (and may be foolish), but I'm still tempted to vote you for repeatedly putting a target on Fener's head, as well as generally weird play, however, that wouldn't be cricked.
Also, alright:
Vote Barghast