Aranatha, on 30 May 2013 - 08:03 AM, said:
I definately don't want to lynch Sheltatha today.
The reason being, I don't expect scum to play as loose as Eloth has done, nor as confused as Tennes has been. Nimander is odd, could be sympish, but I don't see a recruiter playing like that - too vital a role to risk losing to someone who's getting really pissed off and making an omgus case plus 1-3 jumping on the bandwagon. The Shelly lynch was almost like that. The scum Timelord I expect to behave like a symp, NG could be that.
Anyway, all three are basically begging to be offed on a day on which we have no real clues. They start to raise a little bit of frustration across the board by going against simple standards for town play, and faulty town play is a heaven for scum. Not only is it likely to culminate into a town lynch, it also presents scum with the chance to be holier-than-thou and build their image as a useful townie - without it requiring to take a stance that can backfire on them later.
So, I expect the recruiter to play very restrained, almost strict by the rules.
The thread had a rythm and a flow to it like other games. One that favored scum, as we had taken 2 RI's out and didn't have any real concrete leads. Then... votes start to pile on Nimander and the TL weirdness starts. The thread breaks into chaos, there is a reveal and we are off on a tangent and discussing 3 things at once.
Why would scum want to disrupt the thread if things were going there way? Something changed and it's obviously the Nimander voting.
remove vote
vote Nimander
Also, I assume TL time bending is finite. Seems like a waste of time to keep switching someone's vote when they are on thread and able to replace it immediately? But, who knows, they could have a stockpile of time.