Eldat Pressen, on 15 May 2013 - 05:41 PM, said:
Kilava, on 15 May 2013 - 05:34 PM, said:
Mockra, on 15 May 2013 - 05:22 PM, said:
This playstyle is a choice, and on Day 1 appears heavy handed and contrived to me (and others). Thus, the case against Kilava is based on the presumed assumption that Kilava is trying to blend in by giving the appearance of a good townie, above suspicion and too valuable to lynch. It is a fairly easy role to fake in my experience (given my playstyle doesn't change much, regardless of my role status, RI or Scum) and done right, people can get through the game misguiding town.
Fortunately, played too earnestly, or nervously (as in Kilava's case, as mentioned by Ruse), the playstyle smells wrong, and inconsistencies, however tenuous, crop up. Kilava fits the bill of someone using the playstyle to hide in plain sight, not as a natural, innocent, helpful townie with nothing to hide.
That is why I vote Kilava and will push to see her lynched today.
Or that's just how I play, you know? Thoughtful and analytic seems how one should try and play town, imo.
If you actually pointed out any of the claimed "inconsistencies" that made any sort of sense there would at least be some sort of case to bite into. As it stands, all I've had are attacks purely on playstyle, walls of quotes that don't really pertain to much, and speculation trying to make something scummy out of anything I've posted that the word "tenuous" is much too kind to.
You realize, of course, that you are now in the position that you have to be lynched, or the scum will just keep you around to cause discord and make us waste a lynch on WIFOM down the line. Sucks to be you.
Hah, I disagree. In that case, that would be true of anyone who got a few votes, or some random accusations. Nice of you to try and further the lynch like that though.