Help
apparently Trake doesn't appreciate idle voting and prefers the hard core serious business only 15 minutes after the game begins
Mafia 101 Game Thread Meat & Potatoes
#42
Trake 
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 0
- Joined: 20-March 13
Posted 13 May 2013 - 02:34 PM
Ruse, on 13 May 2013 - 01:27 PM, said:
It has been at least 10 minutes and they have not posted!
Vote Trake
For my eyes and posts to read.
Vote Trake
For my eyes and posts to read.
Huh?? Unless your signed in as a mod (then you would be abusing your powers). You can not know if anyone is lurking. I know that I was not signed in naked so neither your comment nor you vote make any sense.
#43
Trake
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 0
- Joined: 20-March 13
Posted 13 May 2013 - 02:37 PM
Monok Ochem, on 13 May 2013 - 02:30 PM, said:
apparently Trake doesn't appreciate idle voting and prefers the hard core serious business only 15 minutes after the game begins
I love spam fests. However I find it extremely suspicious when people vote (which I construe as signaling) when said Pathshaper says that votes do not count. If people want to screw there team over in the first 20 minutes of a game then yes I will jump on it and go hard core to vote them off. Not jumping on a obvious mistake is how scum gets a free ride. If it was a towny that made that mistake then they should be lynched for looking like scum so that next time they won't make that mistake. It is a learning experience that I want to help to teach.
#44
Ruse
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 93
- Joined: 05-October 08
Posted 13 May 2013 - 02:41 PM
Joke votes aren't meant to make sense sonny. If you want to be serious then that is up to you.
The whole vote before the timer begins is a good way for a killer pair to concoct the role of pretend symp and lynch an innocent. I wouldn't put it past you being Denul's partner. That way we think Denul is symp and so try and make connections to who his master is. Therefore not voting Denul. Now you coming on and making the case against Thyr makes me believe you could be connected that way.
The whole vote before the timer begins is a good way for a killer pair to concoct the role of pretend symp and lynch an innocent. I wouldn't put it past you being Denul's partner. That way we think Denul is symp and so try and make connections to who his master is. Therefore not voting Denul. Now you coming on and making the case against Thyr makes me believe you could be connected that way.
#45
Trake
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 0
- Joined: 20-March 13
Posted 13 May 2013 - 02:50 PM
Ruse, on 13 May 2013 - 02:41 PM, said:
Joke votes aren't meant to make sense sonny. If you want to be serious then that is up to you.
The whole vote before the timer begins is a good way for a killer pair to concoct the role of pretend symp and lynch an innocent. I wouldn't put it past you being Denul's partner. That way we think Denul is symp and so try and make connections to who his master is. Therefore not voting Denul. Now you coming on and making the case against Thyr makes me believe you could be connected that way.
The whole vote before the timer begins is a good way for a killer pair to concoct the role of pretend symp and lynch an innocent. I wouldn't put it past you being Denul's partner. That way we think Denul is symp and so try and make connections to who his master is. Therefore not voting Denul. Now you coming on and making the case against Thyr makes me believe you could be connected that way.
*sarcasm*
Ahh so you are going off of the tried and true and complete making sense theory that scum wants to be out and making suspicious movements on day one. I am sure that if you go back for the 100+ games you will find that theory is perfectly solid. Because it is known that scum wants nothing more to draw attention to themselves right off the bat. Your brilliance is only shared by your good looks. *sarcasm*
#46
Trake
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 0
- Joined: 20-March 13
Posted 13 May 2013 - 03:28 PM
Ruse, on 13 May 2013 - 02:41 PM, said:
Joke votes aren't meant to make sense sonny. If you want to be serious then that is up to you.
The whole vote before the timer begins is a good way for a killer pair to concoct the role of pretend symp and lynch an innocent. I wouldn't put it past you being Denul's partner. That way we think Denul is symp and so try and make connections to who his master is. Therefore not voting Denul. Now you coming on and making the case against Thyr makes me believe you could be connected that way.
The whole vote before the timer begins is a good way for a killer pair to concoct the role of pretend symp and lynch an innocent. I wouldn't put it past you being Denul's partner. That way we think Denul is symp and so try and make connections to who his master is. Therefore not voting Denul. Now you coming on and making the case against Thyr makes me believe you could be connected that way.
Now you are attempting to say that Denul is scum and that himself and me are conspiring to set up a member of town on day one. Why would scum need to do that? If I was a killer then I would be making no waves and as few posts as possible to make sure that I was under no pressure. That way I could kill at night and let town lynch themselves as they are wonton to do. What you suggest makes no sense because it draws attention to scum which is something that they want to avoid at all costs. That is why it is a mistake by Denul to signal his master not a mistake by Thy. Your rapid and unfamiliarity with how scum functions and they kind of presence that they typically have indicates that either you are a noob or are doing a mildly retarded job of attempting to discredit me by strawmanning.
#47
Ryadd Eleis
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 20-March 13
Posted 13 May 2013 - 04:52 PM
Ruse, on 13 May 2013 - 01:47 PM, said:
Just going to throw this out there, how fast was that response from Trake AND he points fingers elsewhere straight away. Seemingly scummy move in my opinion.
As to his suspicions, I see where he is coming from. I don't think any symp would be so obvious to do that. As when we finally catch a killer it can easily be traced back.
I think Trake could well be a killer.
As to his suspicions, I see where he is coming from. I don't think any symp would be so obvious to do that. As when we finally catch a killer it can easily be traced back.
I think Trake could well be a killer.
Why did you vote for him in the first place though?
#48
Kilava
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 20-March 13
Posted 13 May 2013 - 05:10 PM
Ruse seems to be jumping to overly complex suspicions for how early in the game it is. Fake symping as a deliberate angle does not seem very plausible. Less common at least than symp clue votes.
Also, his vote on Trake is rather odd.
However, I'm going to vote Trake for over reacting.
Actually you made a pathetically miserable attempt to draw attention to something. No pressure and just a little joke. That isn't drawing attention to anything but your lack of conviction. Which we can see by the fact that you posted after PS indicated that votes count and did not apply any pressure to your suspect. If you had conviction then you would point out me for my comment and then put pressure on your suspect. Instead you show that you are like a politician trying to get elected and perfectly willing to flip flop in any direction as long as you think you look good. But no conviction and no understanding of how to actually apply pressure to someone to see if in fact your hypothesis is correct. So you fail.
This post jumped out at me. While there certainly can be something scummy in Pallid's sort of behaviour,in this case Trake's reaction just seems unwarranted. That reaction, just because he didn't vote, early on day one, after prodding?
More to the point, it's an accusation that doesn't arise until Pallid prods Trake. Funny, given how scummy it apparently is.
If Pallid has shown that he is "like a politician trying to get elected and perfectly willing to flip flop in any direction as long as you think you look good", then why isn't Trake showing his own conviction and voting him, as he claims is the way to go? Is he that confident that someone else seems scummier than that?
I also really don't like "If you had conviction then you would point out me for my comment and then put pressure on your suspect". Firstly, for vote pressuring. Secondly for the slight implication that he should be given credit in the case that Pallid did vote. Which brings me on to the other thing I really don't like about this post. It has this tone of insistence that he was the instigator/contributing/adding something original.
This reaction, because Pallid lightly suggested that Trake was not adding anything new?
Trake's reaction is OMGUS, but more than that, he argues that what he is doing is totally different because he voted, and that Trake (because he voted) is the one who really brought attention to the issue, look at useful and original he is. Seems to me that the suggestion of unoriginality hit a bit of a nerve.
What really bugs me about the reaction is the fact that, while he's making accusations against Pallid, it's actually defensive. And to me, it seems rather too passionate a defense for a rather small prod.
Vote Trake.
Also, his vote on Trake is rather odd.
However, I'm going to vote Trake for over reacting.
Trake, on 13 May 2013 - 02:21 PM, said:
Pallid, on 13 May 2013 - 01:46 PM, said:
^ Duh. I pretty much said, "let's watch Denul and Thyr", Denul cried, and I laughed. So Trake is repeating this for our benefits?
Anyways, off for work, and won't be posting until later tonight.
Anyways, off for work, and won't be posting until later tonight.
Actually you made a pathetically miserable attempt to draw attention to something. No pressure and just a little joke. That isn't drawing attention to anything but your lack of conviction. Which we can see by the fact that you posted after PS indicated that votes count and did not apply any pressure to your suspect. If you had conviction then you would point out me for my comment and then put pressure on your suspect. Instead you show that you are like a politician trying to get elected and perfectly willing to flip flop in any direction as long as you think you look good. But no conviction and no understanding of how to actually apply pressure to someone to see if in fact your hypothesis is correct. So you fail.
This post jumped out at me. While there certainly can be something scummy in Pallid's sort of behaviour,in this case Trake's reaction just seems unwarranted. That reaction, just because he didn't vote, early on day one, after prodding?
More to the point, it's an accusation that doesn't arise until Pallid prods Trake. Funny, given how scummy it apparently is.
If Pallid has shown that he is "like a politician trying to get elected and perfectly willing to flip flop in any direction as long as you think you look good", then why isn't Trake showing his own conviction and voting him, as he claims is the way to go? Is he that confident that someone else seems scummier than that?
I also really don't like "If you had conviction then you would point out me for my comment and then put pressure on your suspect". Firstly, for vote pressuring. Secondly for the slight implication that he should be given credit in the case that Pallid did vote. Which brings me on to the other thing I really don't like about this post. It has this tone of insistence that he was the instigator/contributing/adding something original.
This reaction, because Pallid lightly suggested that Trake was not adding anything new?
Trake's reaction is OMGUS, but more than that, he argues that what he is doing is totally different because he voted, and that Trake (because he voted) is the one who really brought attention to the issue, look at useful and original he is. Seems to me that the suggestion of unoriginality hit a bit of a nerve.
What really bugs me about the reaction is the fact that, while he's making accusations against Pallid, it's actually defensive. And to me, it seems rather too passionate a defense for a rather small prod.
Vote Trake.
#49
Trake
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 0
- Joined: 20-March 13
Posted 13 May 2013 - 05:27 PM
Kilava, on 13 May 2013 - 05:10 PM, said:
Ruse seems to be jumping to overly complex suspicions for how early in the game it is. Fake symping as a deliberate angle does not seem very plausible. Less common at least than symp clue votes.
Also, his vote on Trake is rather odd.
However, I'm going to vote Trake for over reacting.
Actually you made a pathetically miserable attempt to draw attention to something. No pressure and just a little joke. That isn't drawing attention to anything but your lack of conviction. Which we can see by the fact that you posted after PS indicated that votes count and did not apply any pressure to your suspect. If you had conviction then you would point out me for my comment and then put pressure on your suspect. Instead you show that you are like a politician trying to get elected and perfectly willing to flip flop in any direction as long as you think you look good. But no conviction and no understanding of how to actually apply pressure to someone to see if in fact your hypothesis is correct. So you fail.
This post jumped out at me. While there certainly can be something scummy in Pallid's sort of behaviour,in this case Trake's reaction just seems unwarranted. That reaction, just because he didn't vote, early on day one, after prodding?
More to the point, it's an accusation that doesn't arise until Pallid prods Trake. Funny, given how scummy it apparently is.
If Pallid has shown that he is "like a politician trying to get elected and perfectly willing to flip flop in any direction as long as you think you look good", then why isn't Trake showing his own conviction and voting him, as he claims is the way to go? Is he that confident that someone else seems scummier than that?
I also really don't like "If you had conviction then you would point out me for my comment and then put pressure on your suspect". Firstly, for vote pressuring. Secondly for the slight implication that he should be given credit in the case that Pallid did vote. Which brings me on to the other thing I really don't like about this post. It has this tone of insistence that he was the instigator/contributing/adding something original.
This reaction, because Pallid lightly suggested that Trake was not adding anything new?
Trake's reaction is OMGUS, but more than that, he argues that what he is doing is totally different because he voted, and that Trake (because he voted) is the one who really brought attention to the issue, look at useful and original he is. Seems to me that the suggestion of unoriginality hit a bit of a nerve.
What really bugs me about the reaction is the fact that, while he's making accusations against Pallid, it's actually defensive. And to me, it seems rather too passionate a defense for a rather small prod.
Vote Trake.
Also, his vote on Trake is rather odd.
However, I'm going to vote Trake for over reacting.
Trake, on 13 May 2013 - 02:21 PM, said:
Pallid, on 13 May 2013 - 01:46 PM, said:
^ Duh. I pretty much said, "let's watch Denul and Thyr", Denul cried, and I laughed. So Trake is repeating this for our benefits?
Anyways, off for work, and won't be posting until later tonight.
Anyways, off for work, and won't be posting until later tonight.
Actually you made a pathetically miserable attempt to draw attention to something. No pressure and just a little joke. That isn't drawing attention to anything but your lack of conviction. Which we can see by the fact that you posted after PS indicated that votes count and did not apply any pressure to your suspect. If you had conviction then you would point out me for my comment and then put pressure on your suspect. Instead you show that you are like a politician trying to get elected and perfectly willing to flip flop in any direction as long as you think you look good. But no conviction and no understanding of how to actually apply pressure to someone to see if in fact your hypothesis is correct. So you fail.
This post jumped out at me. While there certainly can be something scummy in Pallid's sort of behaviour,in this case Trake's reaction just seems unwarranted. That reaction, just because he didn't vote, early on day one, after prodding?
More to the point, it's an accusation that doesn't arise until Pallid prods Trake. Funny, given how scummy it apparently is.
If Pallid has shown that he is "like a politician trying to get elected and perfectly willing to flip flop in any direction as long as you think you look good", then why isn't Trake showing his own conviction and voting him, as he claims is the way to go? Is he that confident that someone else seems scummier than that?
I also really don't like "If you had conviction then you would point out me for my comment and then put pressure on your suspect". Firstly, for vote pressuring. Secondly for the slight implication that he should be given credit in the case that Pallid did vote. Which brings me on to the other thing I really don't like about this post. It has this tone of insistence that he was the instigator/contributing/adding something original.
This reaction, because Pallid lightly suggested that Trake was not adding anything new?
Trake's reaction is OMGUS, but more than that, he argues that what he is doing is totally different because he voted, and that Trake (because he voted) is the one who really brought attention to the issue, look at useful and original he is. Seems to me that the suggestion of unoriginality hit a bit of a nerve.
What really bugs me about the reaction is the fact that, while he's making accusations against Pallid, it's actually defensive. And to me, it seems rather too passionate a defense for a rather small prod.
Vote Trake.
My reaction to Pallid is only as far as his interaction with me. Why would I vote for him. I voted for Thy because I believe that Denul was attempting to signal thy with his early (not counting vote). I am making no accusations against Pallid other then calling him a retard. Which also holds true for everyone who plays mafia and isn't me. But that is just experience. OMGUS only counts as far as voting for someone after they had voted for you. The response to Pallid wasn't about orginality but about his conviction in his suspicions. Rather then pallaid saying " hey I said that earlier and am going to vote for either Denul or Thy based on that observation" he instead goes hey I said that earlier your just coping me and not adding anything. Ok so. Is he really suspicious of them? Or is he pissed that I didn't credit him with seeing the sympage. Pallid shouldn't care if I or anyone follow up on his observation. I couldn't care less about someone following up on an observation.
The only accusation that I have made of Pallid is that he has no conviction to vote for whom he suspects. If you have a problem with that then you are a fucking moron. Which based on your obvious idiotic reading of the thread you are. Rather then looking at or making a comment about what is being posted you I.e. the vote for Thy by Denul and the random vote by and logic by Ruse. You instead follow ruse with a vote on my for being hostile in a mafia game toward a player who I haven't voted for. Do me a favor or better yet do a favor for yourself because I am an asshole who you won't do any favors for. Learn how to look at a thread and read a thread before you post. You don't make any sense and you lower your own and everyone else's IQ by pretending to.
#50
Trake
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 0
- Joined: 20-March 13
Posted 13 May 2013 - 05:29 PM
Kilava, on 13 May 2013 - 05:10 PM, said:
Ruse seems to be jumping to overly complex suspicions for how early in the game it is. Fake symping as a deliberate angle does not seem very plausible. Less common at least than symp clue votes.
Also, his vote on Trake is rather odd.
However, I'm going to vote Trake for over reacting.
Actually you made a pathetically miserable attempt to draw attention to something. No pressure and just a little joke. That isn't drawing attention to anything but your lack of conviction. Which we can see by the fact that you posted after PS indicated that votes count and did not apply any pressure to your suspect. If you had conviction then you would point out me for my comment and then put pressure on your suspect. Instead you show that you are like a politician trying to get elected and perfectly willing to flip flop in any direction as long as you think you look good. But no conviction and no understanding of how to actually apply pressure to someone to see if in fact your hypothesis is correct. So you fail.
This post jumped out at me. While there certainly can be something scummy in Pallid's sort of behaviour,in this case Trake's reaction just seems unwarranted. That reaction, just because he didn't vote, early on day one, after prodding?
More to the point, it's an accusation that doesn't arise until Pallid prods Trake. Funny, given how scummy it apparently is.
If Pallid has shown that he is "like a politician trying to get elected and perfectly willing to flip flop in any direction as long as you think you look good", then why isn't Trake showing his own conviction and voting him, as he claims is the way to go? Is he that confident that someone else seems scummier than that?
I also really don't like "If you had conviction then you would point out me for my comment and then put pressure on your suspect". Firstly, for vote pressuring. Secondly for the slight implication that he should be given credit in the case that Pallid did vote. Which brings me on to the other thing I really don't like about this post. It has this tone of insistence that he was the instigator/contributing/adding something original.
This reaction, because Pallid lightly suggested that Trake was not adding anything new?
Trake's reaction is OMGUS, but more than that, he argues that what he is doing is totally different because he voted, and that Trake (because he voted) is the one who really brought attention to the issue, look at useful and original he is. Seems to me that the suggestion of unoriginality hit a bit of a nerve.
What really bugs me about the reaction is the fact that, while he's making accusations against Pallid, it's actually defensive. And to me, it seems rather too passionate a defense for a rather small prod.
Vote Trake.
Also, his vote on Trake is rather odd.
However, I'm going to vote Trake for over reacting.
Trake, on 13 May 2013 - 02:21 PM, said:
Pallid, on 13 May 2013 - 01:46 PM, said:
^ Duh. I pretty much said, "let's watch Denul and Thyr", Denul cried, and I laughed. So Trake is repeating this for our benefits?
Anyways, off for work, and won't be posting until later tonight.
Anyways, off for work, and won't be posting until later tonight.
Actually you made a pathetically miserable attempt to draw attention to something. No pressure and just a little joke. That isn't drawing attention to anything but your lack of conviction. Which we can see by the fact that you posted after PS indicated that votes count and did not apply any pressure to your suspect. If you had conviction then you would point out me for my comment and then put pressure on your suspect. Instead you show that you are like a politician trying to get elected and perfectly willing to flip flop in any direction as long as you think you look good. But no conviction and no understanding of how to actually apply pressure to someone to see if in fact your hypothesis is correct. So you fail.
This post jumped out at me. While there certainly can be something scummy in Pallid's sort of behaviour,in this case Trake's reaction just seems unwarranted. That reaction, just because he didn't vote, early on day one, after prodding?
More to the point, it's an accusation that doesn't arise until Pallid prods Trake. Funny, given how scummy it apparently is.
If Pallid has shown that he is "like a politician trying to get elected and perfectly willing to flip flop in any direction as long as you think you look good", then why isn't Trake showing his own conviction and voting him, as he claims is the way to go? Is he that confident that someone else seems scummier than that?
I also really don't like "If you had conviction then you would point out me for my comment and then put pressure on your suspect". Firstly, for vote pressuring. Secondly for the slight implication that he should be given credit in the case that Pallid did vote. Which brings me on to the other thing I really don't like about this post. It has this tone of insistence that he was the instigator/contributing/adding something original.
This reaction, because Pallid lightly suggested that Trake was not adding anything new?
Trake's reaction is OMGUS, but more than that, he argues that what he is doing is totally different because he voted, and that Trake (because he voted) is the one who really brought attention to the issue, look at useful and original he is. Seems to me that the suggestion of unoriginality hit a bit of a nerve.
What really bugs me about the reaction is the fact that, while he's making accusations against Pallid, it's actually defensive. And to me, it seems rather too passionate a defense for a rather small prod.
Vote Trake.
By the way do you have an opinion on the issue? Or is your opinion that you think that I am overreacting to nothing. In which case do you think that I am scum. If your town you should be trying to find scum. So vote for me if you think that I am scum otherwise process what has happened in the game so far and vote for the person who you think is likely scum. I.e. Making scummy moves trying not to stand out. Or continue being a moron. It doesn't matter to me.
#52
Kilava
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 20-March 13
Posted 13 May 2013 - 06:15 PM
Trake, on 13 May 2013 - 05:29 PM, said:
By the way do you have an opinion on the issue? Or is your opinion that you think that I am overreacting to nothing. In which case do you think that I am scum. If your town you should be trying to find scum. So vote for me if you think that I am scum otherwise process what has happened in the game so far and vote for the person who you think is likely scum. I.e. Making scummy moves trying not to stand out. Or continue being a moron. It doesn't matter to me.
An opinion on which issue? Whether or not Pallid should have voted?
I think you're over-reacting to a very slight bit of pressure, and it makes you seem over anxious to be seen as contributing/too worried about being accused of rehashing other people. Ofc I'm voting you because I think you are likely scummy. Your post just seems to be basic mafia 101.
#53
Path-Shaper
- Mafia Modgod
-
- Group: Game Mod
- Posts: 1,255
- Joined: 01-October 08
Posted 13 May 2013 - 06:16 PM
It is Day 1. 31 hours 2 minutes remaining.
14 players still alive: Anthras, Denul, Eldat Pressen, Kalse, Kilava, Mockra, Monok Ochem, Pallid, Serc, Spite, Ruse, Ryadd Eleis, Thyrllan, Trake
8 votes to lynch, 7 to go to night.
2 votes Trake: Ruse, Kilava
1 vote Thyrllan: Trake
1 vote Kilava: Kalse
Players not voted: Anthras, Denul, Eldat Pressen, Mockra, Monok Ochem, Pallid, Serc, Spite, Ryadd Eleis, Thyrllan
14 players still alive: Anthras, Denul, Eldat Pressen, Kalse, Kilava, Mockra, Monok Ochem, Pallid, Serc, Spite, Ruse, Ryadd Eleis, Thyrllan, Trake
8 votes to lynch, 7 to go to night.
2 votes Trake: Ruse, Kilava
1 vote Thyrllan: Trake
1 vote Kilava: Kalse
Players not voted: Anthras, Denul, Eldat Pressen, Mockra, Monok Ochem, Pallid, Serc, Spite, Ryadd Eleis, Thyrllan
This post has been edited by Path-Shaper: 13 May 2013 - 08:04 PM
Only someone with this much power could make this many frittatas without breaking any eggs.
#54
Kilava
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 20-March 13
Posted 13 May 2013 - 06:33 PM
Kalse, on 13 May 2013 - 05:46 PM, said:
Kilava, on 13 May 2013 - 03:11 AM, said:
Also, check my rockin' panther avatar.
Vote Kilava
Only scum would admire a silent stalker killer who is able to hide in the night.
You're just jealous.
Oh, look, a dragon avatar. I've never seen one of those before. How overplayed.
#55
Trake
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 0
- Joined: 20-March 13
Posted 13 May 2013 - 06:48 PM
Kilava, on 13 May 2013 - 06:15 PM, said:
Trake, on 13 May 2013 - 05:29 PM, said:
By the way do you have an opinion on the issue? Or is your opinion that you think that I am overreacting to nothing. In which case do you think that I am scum. If your town you should be trying to find scum. So vote for me if you think that I am scum otherwise process what has happened in the game so far and vote for the person who you think is likely scum. I.e. Making scummy moves trying not to stand out. Or continue being a moron. It doesn't matter to me.
An opinion on which issue? Whether or not Pallid should have voted?
I think you're over-reacting to a very slight bit of pressure, and it makes you seem over anxious to be seen as contributing/too worried about being accused of rehashing other people. Ofc I'm voting you because I think you are likely scummy. Your post just seems to be basic mafia 101.
What the fuck is it with you and fucking Pallid? The question isn't about fucking pallid you retarded evolution reject. The fucking question is about fucking Denul and fucking THY and or anything about Ruse?
If you think that I am scummy fine. But what the fuck does Pallid have to do with anything. What do you mean by mafia 101? You have no opinion about Denul or Thy because you either don't think that there is anything to have an opinion about or because your a fucking twit who couldn't put his shoes on the right feet with out your mommy helping. You think that a vote on me is pressure. If I was scum then it might be. The fact that you think that I am in front and asking question and wanting answers makes me suspicious and scum just tells me that you can't tell scummy players dicks from your momma's tit in the dark.
Now lets talk about your willful ignoring of my now repeated questions about your retarded opinion on Denul and Thy also your willful and pathetic attempts to try to derail the discussion from Denul and Thy.
#56
Trake
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 0
- Joined: 20-March 13
Posted 13 May 2013 - 06:48 PM
Kalse, on 13 May 2013 - 05:46 PM, said:
Kilava, on 13 May 2013 - 03:11 AM, said:
Also, check my rockin' panther avatar.
Vote Kilava
Only scum would admire a silent stalker killer who is able to hide in the night.
Kalse do you have any opinion on Denul and Thy? Or for that matter Ruse?
#57
Ryadd Eleis
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 20-March 13
Posted 13 May 2013 - 06:49 PM
Kalse, on 13 May 2013 - 05:46 PM, said:
Kilava, on 13 May 2013 - 03:11 AM, said:
Also, check my rockin' panther avatar.
Vote Kilava
Only scum would admire a silent stalker killer who is able to hide in the night.
I admire silent stalker night killers. They make wonderful rugs.
#59
Trake
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 0
- Joined: 20-March 13
Posted 13 May 2013 - 06:58 PM
Ryadd Eleis, on 13 May 2013 - 06:49 PM, said:
Kalse, on 13 May 2013 - 05:46 PM, said:
Kilava, on 13 May 2013 - 03:11 AM, said:
Also, check my rockin' panther avatar.
Vote Kilava
Only scum would admire a silent stalker killer who is able to hide in the night.
I admire silent stalker night killers. They make wonderful rugs.
Ryadd what is your opinion on Denul and Thy?
#60
Kilava
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 20-March 13
Posted 13 May 2013 - 07:15 PM
Trake, on 13 May 2013 - 06:48 PM, said:
Kilava, on 13 May 2013 - 06:15 PM, said:
Trake, on 13 May 2013 - 05:29 PM, said:
By the way do you have an opinion on the issue? Or is your opinion that you think that I am overreacting to nothing. In which case do you think that I am scum. If your town you should be trying to find scum. So vote for me if you think that I am scum otherwise process what has happened in the game so far and vote for the person who you think is likely scum. I.e. Making scummy moves trying not to stand out. Or continue being a moron. It doesn't matter to me.
An opinion on which issue? Whether or not Pallid should have voted?
I think you're over-reacting to a very slight bit of pressure, and it makes you seem over anxious to be seen as contributing/too worried about being accused of rehashing other people. Ofc I'm voting you because I think you are likely scummy. Your post just seems to be basic mafia 101.
What the fuck is it with you and fucking Pallid? The question isn't about fucking pallid you retarded evolution reject. The fucking question is about fucking Denul and fucking THY and or anything about Ruse?
If you think that I am scummy fine. But what the fuck does Pallid have to do with anything. What do you mean by mafia 101? You have no opinion about Denul or Thy because you either don't think that there is anything to have an opinion about or because your a fucking twit who couldn't put his shoes on the right feet with out your mommy helping. You think that a vote on me is pressure. If I was scum then it might be. The fact that you think that I am in front and asking question and wanting answers makes me suspicious and scum just tells me that you can't tell scummy players dicks from your momma's tit in the dark.
Now lets talk about your willful ignoring of my now repeated questions about your retarded opinion on Denul and Thy also your willful and pathetic attempts to try to derail the discussion from Denul and Thy.
Why Pallid? Maybe because the majority of my post was addressing your post about Pallid not voting and you gave no indication as to which "issue" you were talking about?
What I mean by Mafia 101 is stuff like this:
Trake, on 13 May 2013 - 05:29 PM, said:
If your town you should be trying to find scum. So vote for me if you think that I am scum otherwise process what has happened in the game so far and vote for the person who you think is likely scum.
The town should be trying to find the scum? I should vote for the person I think is scum? Wow, thanks for telling me, that never would have occurred to me in a game where that is the whole fucking point you twat.
Oh look, I can swear as well.
Though it is interesting that in a post where you make sure to be loud and obnoxious you also make sure to draw the connection between scum and quiet play.
Trake, on 13 May 2013 - 06:48 PM, said:
[...] likely scum. I.e. Making scummy moves trying not to stand out. Or continue being a moron. It doesn't matter to me.
Being obtuse about what you're asking and then accusing them of willfully ignoring the questions is a bit rich too.
I don't think it's suspicious to ask questions, but nice strawman. I do think it's suspicious to get massively defensive when someone points out the questions you're asking aren't entirely new.
As for my avoiding Thyr and Denul, you might want to notice that I actually have already mentioned it, in the post you quoted.
Trake, on 13 May 2013 - 05:29 PM, said:
Kilava, on 13 May 2013 - 05:10 PM, said:
Ruse seems to be jumping to overly complex suspicions for how early in the game it is. Fake symping as a deliberate angle does not seem very plausible. Less common at least than symp clue votes.
By the way do you have an opinion on the issue?
I think it's unlikely that Denul is fake symping Thyr (as suggested by Ruse), and that it's more likely to be a symp clue, which does happen from time to time. I'm not overly suspicious of the post in itself, as in it doesn't seem like he's really stretching for an excuse to make the joke vote. On the posts themselves, Ruse's is weirder, and atm there is not much more to go on.
Also, it's early day one. You seem to be trying to direct people pretty strongly for how early it is. Are you that confident at this stage? I mean, "attempts to try to derail the discussion from Denul and Thy." - really? There's plenty of time for discussion, I'm quite happy to discuss Thyr and Denul, but am also happy to discuss other people. That's not de-railing, that's just not getting tunnel vision at the beginning of day one...
