Help
I probably should've mentioned this earlier but didn't recall - anyways I can confirm that Incapacitate = vote block since that is how it was phrased to me. And I was reminded of it becuase I am once again vote blocked today (sigh)...
Mafia 95 - Legend of Korra Game Thread
#382
Tulas Shorn 
- Sergeant
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 98
- Joined: 01-May 08
Posted 20 December 2012 - 04:56 PM
Liosan, did you get a fresh message of incapacitation or is this a continuance of yesterday's incapacitation? I'm wondering if vote blocking is the dreaded removal of bending ability (akin to a good-guy being unable to fight with the rest of the group).
#383
Silanah
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 23-November 08
Posted 20 December 2012 - 05:04 PM
Tulas Shorn, on 20 December 2012 - 04:56 PM, said:
Liosan, did you get a fresh message of incapacitation or is this a continuance of yesterday's incapacitation? I'm wondering if vote blocking is the dreaded removal of bending ability (akin to a good-guy being unable to fight with the rest of the group).
I don't think so... My message only said that I couldn't vote or use abilities day 3. No continuation after that afaik.
#385
Tulas Shorn
- Sergeant
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 98
- Joined: 01-May 08
Posted 20 December 2012 - 05:24 PM
Interesting, so not necessarily equivalent to permanent removal of bending abilities.
I'll be interested in seeing how many are vote blocked today.
I'll be interested in seeing how many are vote blocked today.
#386
Tulas Shorn
- Sergeant
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 98
- Joined: 01-May 08
Posted 20 December 2012 - 05:25 PM
Galain, on 20 December 2012 - 05:22 PM, said:
I can now also confirm the wording myself.
Spite, from now on I will use the word incapacitate to describe vote blocking
It is the wording the mod gods messaged me from on high.
Spite, from now on I will use the word incapacitate to describe vote blocking
It is the wording the mod gods messaged me from on high.
Not that you didn't know this from the outset, right?
#388
Osseric
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 17-June 09
Posted 20 December 2012 - 05:31 PM
Anomandaris, on 20 December 2012 - 09:22 AM, said:
Reading up. Spite's defence is stupid if Its actually a defence.He could have destroyed the case before it even began by trying to dismantle the case and not attacking Galain. That means either Spite is stupid (admittedly more likely of the 2) or Galain/Spite have a lover connection or something with Galain having some protection(admittedly crazy). It is possible that the Galain is helping Spite to get in everyone's good side.He has protection so he is safe and Spite has publicity and can lead the thread.
It's very unlikely, but it just doesn't seem natural to defend someone like that and expect him not to get lynched.
UNLESS, Lio is a high ranking Equalist/Town.In which case it is possible that other members of the faction (whatever it is) know him (like in last Sengoku game) and are defending him.that even explains the reluctance of quiet a few people to vote him.Oh,and if he is high ranking he may be protected from a lynch, so he does not care about being lynched.But even if he doesn't get lynched we can most probably tell about him in the next day, a double LP is too much even for a leader.
I don't know if I'm making sense or not.this post was a good idea before I started it.
I will vote Lio if it is needed for the lynch but I now I wait for further discussion.
It's very unlikely, but it just doesn't seem natural to defend someone like that and expect him not to get lynched.
UNLESS, Lio is a high ranking Equalist/Town.In which case it is possible that other members of the faction (whatever it is) know him (like in last Sengoku game) and are defending him.that even explains the reluctance of quiet a few people to vote him.Oh,and if he is high ranking he may be protected from a lynch, so he does not care about being lynched.But even if he doesn't get lynched we can most probably tell about him in the next day, a double LP is too much even for a leader.
I don't know if I'm making sense or not.this post was a good idea before I started it.
I will vote Lio if it is needed for the lynch but I now I wait for further discussion.
Nice to see you came back...
I had you as a good guy, but it's odd that you would leave and not come back.
With how many people seem to disappear and not place votes, combined with all the vote blocking thats going on, it'll be a wonder if we can ever get a lynch.
#391
Osseric
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 17-June 09
Posted 20 December 2012 - 05:42 PM
ok, so 2 nights in a row with no equalist action. 2 nights in a row that Liosan has been incapacitated. 2 people that are adamant about not voting Liosan. He has to be Amon. (and we suspect an equalist faction of size 4-5). So Ruse, Spite, Tulas and Lio. Possibly one more?
vote Liosan
Not sure if there are even enough people who can vote to get a lynch now. But there is no way I am not voting Liosan today. Just way too much information gained by his lynch. We have to decide this or it will drag on and taint every subsequent decision in this game.
vote Liosan
Not sure if there are even enough people who can vote to get a lynch now. But there is no way I am not voting Liosan today. Just way too much information gained by his lynch. We have to decide this or it will drag on and taint every subsequent decision in this game.
#392
Osseric
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 17-June 09
Posted 20 December 2012 - 05:54 PM
Tulas Shorn, on 20 December 2012 - 05:25 PM, said:
Galain, on 20 December 2012 - 05:22 PM, said:
I can now also confirm the wording myself.
Spite, from now on I will use the word incapacitate to describe vote blocking
It is the wording the mod gods messaged me from on high.
Spite, from now on I will use the word incapacitate to describe vote blocking
It is the wording the mod gods messaged me from on high.
Not that you didn't know this from the outset, right?
What a good little Symp you are.
#393
Galain
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 6
- Joined: 05-October 08
Posted 20 December 2012 - 05:54 PM
Tulas Shorn, on 20 December 2012 - 05:25 PM, said:
Galain, on 20 December 2012 - 05:22 PM, said:
I can now also confirm the wording myself.
Spite, from now on I will use the word incapacitate to describe vote blocking
It is the wording the mod gods messaged me from on high.
Spite, from now on I will use the word incapacitate to describe vote blocking
It is the wording the mod gods messaged me from on high.
Not that you didn't know this from the outset, right?
You and Spite can argue that all you wish. But it is clear that I was uncertain what terminology to use.
And there is an easy way to verify the 3 non votes. And, might I suggest, a useful way to do so:
Ampelas has 11 posts.
Vote Ampelas
#398
Osseric
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 17-June 09
Posted 20 December 2012 - 06:11 PM
14 people left, 3 who can't vote (assuming there are no more), so we need 8/11 people for a lynch and 2-3 of them are scum... We will need every inno on whatever lynch we decide (if the lynch takes down scum) or else we will end up with another no lynch. If people like Kaschan and Ampleas go another day with no participation we are screwed.
#400
Anomandaris
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 264
- Joined: 06-November 08
Posted 20 December 2012 - 06:12 PM
Osseric, on 20 December 2012 - 05:32 PM, said:
Dammit, if Emur and Anno would have voted when they "checked in" we would have had a lynch. Now we have to go through this shit again and waste another day on it.
Here, look at this dear:
Anomandaris, on 19 December 2012 - 05:41 PM, said:
Agreed,unfortunately I have a test tomorrow.for which I have to study some 2500 pages.of which I have studied 5 as of now.3 of which were full of pictures.So no extensive posting from me till the morrow...
Or not,I don't really care about Bio chemics anyway.The proff is a bastard.
Or not,I don't really care about Bio chemics anyway.The proff is a bastard.
