Diplomacy 9
#342
Posted 18 February 2013 - 11:23 AM
F Brest, please.
Everyone is entitled to his own wrong opinion. - Lizrad
#343
Posted 18 February 2013 - 02:51 PM
Fall 1905 Adjustments
Spring 1906 Movement
I would like to try for a Wednesday resolution if that is alright with everyone. If not then we'll do Friday again.
Spoiler
Spring 1906 Movement
Spoiler
I would like to try for a Wednesday resolution if that is alright with everyone. If not then we'll do Friday again.
This post has been edited by Adjudicator: 18 February 2013 - 02:52 PM
#344
Posted 18 February 2013 - 03:49 PM
Hmm. I'll be gone on holiday from wednesday to tuesday next week with phone access only. The game is currently in such a state that lots of looking at variants and some discussion are necessary elements. Since Gnaw, EM and I don't share timezones, that's added difficulty - may I ask for an extension to wednesday 27?
This post has been edited by Tapper: 18 February 2013 - 03:49 PM
Everyone is entitled to his own wrong opinion. - Lizrad
#345
Posted 18 February 2013 - 04:16 PM
Doh! Well, life happens, eh? I don't have a problem with an extension. I chew through the walls in anticipation of several games these days, so one more won't hurt.
'All Eres were bonecasters, Trull Sengar. For they were the first to carry the spark of awareness, the first so gifted by the spirits.'
#347
Posted 18 February 2013 - 04:50 PM
Sure. Deadline extended until 27th.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
#348
Posted 18 February 2013 - 07:10 PM
Rules question:
Is it acceptable for 1 power to "second" a force to another power? That is to place allow an army to be placed under the command of another power. Until revoked by the 1st power, the 2nd power can submit orders for the army as if it was their own.
It happens all the time in history. Operation Overlord, the Normandy Invasion in WWII, placed field command of all ground forces under General Montgomery.
Is it acceptable for 1 power to "second" a force to another power? That is to place allow an army to be placed under the command of another power. Until revoked by the 1st power, the 2nd power can submit orders for the army as if it was their own.
It happens all the time in history. Operation Overlord, the Normandy Invasion in WWII, placed field command of all ground forces under General Montgomery.
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
#349
Posted 18 February 2013 - 07:19 PM
Gnaw, on 18 February 2013 - 07:10 PM, said:
Rules question:
Is it acceptable for 1 power to "second" a force to another power? That is to place allow an army to be placed under the command of another power. Until revoked by the 1st power, the 2nd power can submit orders for the army as if it was their own.
It happens all the time in history. Operation Overlord, the Normandy Invasion in WWII, placed field command of all ground forces under General Montgomery.
Is it acceptable for 1 power to "second" a force to another power? That is to place allow an army to be placed under the command of another power. Until revoked by the 1st power, the 2nd power can submit orders for the army as if it was their own.
It happens all the time in history. Operation Overlord, the Normandy Invasion in WWII, placed field command of all ground forces under General Montgomery.
Just have who ever it is you want to give contorl over send you what they want ordered and you forward it on to the Adjudicator.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
#350
Posted 18 February 2013 - 07:30 PM
I actually wasn't considering it for me. Even in my old board games where we allowed seconding, a power down to 1 force had to enter its own orders. Just in case of stabby stabby orders.
Since I'm not about to post in game thread what I have in mind for the Forces Of All That Is Good And Right In The World, I'll explain it this way:
Austria seconds its fleet in Eas to Italy, allowing Italy to submit orders for it until Austria revokes the command.
Since I'm not about to post in game thread what I have in mind for the Forces Of All That Is Good And Right In The World, I'll explain it this way:
Austria seconds its fleet in Eas to Italy, allowing Italy to submit orders for it until Austria revokes the command.
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
#351
Posted 18 February 2013 - 07:47 PM
The cheesy way to accomplish that would be for that Italian Fleet to take over another Austrian space, and build a fleet.
But, I think that in general, since Austria and Italy are going to communicate about stuff, the difference of Italy commanding that fleet vs. Italy asking Austria to command that fleet on its behalf is sort of moot.
But, I think that in general, since Austria and Italy are going to communicate about stuff, the difference of Italy commanding that fleet vs. Italy asking Austria to command that fleet on its behalf is sort of moot.
#354
Posted 25 February 2013 - 01:05 AM
Only three days. It's like watching the paint dry on the new Italian town halls in Greece.
#355
Posted 25 February 2013 - 10:38 PM
Yup. Getting my usual jitters.
'All Eres were bonecasters, Trull Sengar. For they were the first to carry the spark of awareness, the first so gifted by the spirits.'
#357
Posted 28 February 2013 - 03:53 PM
Gnaw and EM Tapper has his moves in what's the hold up?
#358
#359
Posted 28 February 2013 - 05:19 PM
Mine are in.
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
#360
Posted 28 February 2013 - 06:43 PM
Let me look over my options one last time. will submit ASAP.
This post has been edited by EmperorMagus: 28 February 2013 - 06:44 PM
Dulce et decorum est
Pro patria mori
#sarcasm
Pro patria mori
#sarcasm

Help


















