Atrahal, on 26 July 2012 - 10:13 PM, said:
Eloth, on 25 July 2012 - 11:57 PM, said:
I'm gonna vote Tellan because of him Accusing people of signalling twice.(on Ducks and Emur )
And that is not natural .
Vote Tellan
This was with 9 hours left in the day. There were not any other decent cases, and Eloth may have been able to build a train on Tellan if he had posted this earlier and managed to generate some discussion around it before leving for bed. But posting it and then leaving for hours means that he does not have to defend his case or further it in any way. This way he can say he is contributing without actually helping town at all.
Eloth, on 26 July 2012 - 12:17 PM, said:
I'm still thinking of Tellan as scum.
Eloth, on 26 July 2012 - 12:19 PM, said:
So you are saying among Rashan, Sorrit, SL, Liosan, Tellan, Kalse, Osseric, Kaschan one of them is scum .
Which one do you suspect?
These next two posts are the only posts with content that have been posted by Eloth today. He sticks by his Tellan vote with no further discussion, even though there was more said about Tellan last night. He questions other people about their suspects but does not go into more detail about actual cases, so again it looks like he is being helpful and contributing when he is really doing nothing of the sort.
All that is tripping me up at the moment is the low posting. I accept that a good strategy for scum is coasting, not saying enough that they put themselves in danger, bbut just enough to look as if they are contributing. However, I find it difficult to believe that scum would draw attention to themselves by low posting to this extreme.
All I see here is railing against a low content poster. I think there are other, less content posters that would be better to lynch if you were to go that route. I don't find him scummy at all, so my vote is not here for scummy behavior (yet).
I disagree with your case. I can look into it deeper, but I don't agree with what is posted here.